UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant  x
☒   
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   o
Check the appropriate box:
o
Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a‑14a6(e)(2))
x
Definitive Proxy Statement
o
Definitive Additional Materials
o
Soliciting Material under §240.14a‑§240.14a12

SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
No fee required.
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a‑14a6(i)(1) and 0‑011.
 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0‑11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
(5)Total fee paid:
o
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0‑11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
(3)Filing Party:
 (4)Date Filed:
  Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.




PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION





a2016proxyimage1a01.jpg
May 1,[               ], 2017
Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the annuala special meeting of stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) to be held at 10:00 a.m. (local time) on Wednesday, June 14,[                ], 2017, at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North, Las Vegas, Nevada.

On September 18, 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended from time to time, the “reincorporation merger agreement”) with SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary (“NewCo”), providing for the merger of the Company with and into NewCo with NewCo surviving the merger, for the sole purpose of changing the Company’s state of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada, including to approve the Articles of Incorporation (“New Charter”) and Bylaws (“New Bylaws”) of the surviving corporation (the “reincorporation merger”). At the special meeting, we will be electing 13 members of our Board of Directors. We will also be conducting an advisorya vote to approve executive officer compensationadopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

The proxy statement accompanying this letter (the “Proxy Statement”) provides you with more specific information concerning the special meeting, the reincorporation merger agreement, the reincorporation merger and an advisory votethe other transactions contemplated by the reincorporation merger agreement.  We encourage you to setcarefully read the frequency of future votes to approve executive officer compensation. Finally, we will be considering ratificationaccompanying Proxy Statement and the copy of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLPreincorporation merger agreement attached as our independent auditor. These matters are described in detail in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.Annex A thereto.

Even if you plan to attend the annualspecial meeting in person, we encourage you to vote your shares right away using one of the advance voting methods described in the accompanying materials.

We look forward to seeing you at the annualspecial meeting.


 Sincerely,
 
ksa02.jpg
    
 
Kevin M. Sheehan
Chief Executive Officer

The accompanying Proxy Statement is dated [               ], 2017, and is first being mailed to our stockholders on or about [               ], 2017.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE REINCORPORATION MERGER, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE REINCORPORATION MERGER AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY, INCLUDING THE REINCORPORATION MERGER, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT.  ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.





PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
6650 S. El Camino6601 Bermuda Road
Las Vegas, NV 8911889119

NOTICE OF ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS

Notice is hereby given that the annuala special meeting of stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation (the “Company”) will be held at 10:00 a.m. (local time) on Wednesday, June 14,[           ], 2017, at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North, Las Vegas, Nevada,NV, for the following purposes:

1.To elect 13 members of the Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.
3.To indicate, on an advisory basis, whether the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers should take place every year, every two years or every three years.
4.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
5.To consider and act upon any other matter thatvote on a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 18, 2017 (as it may properly come beforebe amended from time to time, the meeting or any adjournment thereof.“reincorporation merger agreement”), between the Company and SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary (“NewCo”), providing for the merger of the Company with and into NewCo with NewCo surviving the merger, for the sole purpose of changing the Company’s state of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada, including to approve the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws of the surviving corporation (collectively, the “reincorporation merger”).  A copy of the reincorporation merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the accompanying Proxy Statement.

2.To consider and vote on a proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

After due and careful discussion and consideration, our Board of Directors has unanimously determined that the reincorporation merger agreement  and the reincorporation merger are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of our stockholders, and directed that the adoption of the reincorporation merger agreement be submitted for a vote at a meeting of stockholders.  Accordingly, our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the reincorporation merger agreement and the reincorporation merger, and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 18,[          ], 2017 are entitled to receive notice of and will be entitled to vote at the special meeting and any adjournment thereof. A list of the holders will be open to the examination of stockholders for ten days prior to the date of the meeting, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., at the office of the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 6650 S. El Camino6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 8911889119 and will be available for inspection at the meeting itself.

The proposal to adopt of the reincorporation merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of business on the record date.  The proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote at the special meeting as of the record date, whether or not a quorum is present.

Regardless of the number of shares of our common stock you own, your vote is important. The failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.  Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please take the time to submit a proxy by following the instructions on your proxy card as soon as possible.  If your shares of our common stock are held in an account at a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee, you should instruct your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee how to vote in accordance with the voting instruction form furnished by your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee. If you attend the special meeting and vote in person, your vote by ballot will revoke any proxy previously submitted.



If you plan to attend the special meeting, please note that you may be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.  If you wish to attend the special meeting and your shares of our common stock are held in an account at a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you will need to bring a copy of your voting instruction card or statement reflecting your share ownership as of the record date.

To obtain directions to attend the meeting and vote in person, please telephone the Company at (702) 532‑7663.532-7663.

Whether you plan to be personally present at the meeting or not, we encourage you to submit your vote by proxy as soon as possible using one of the advance voting methods (see page 1 for additional details).

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
AnnualSpecial Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 14,[               ], 2017:

The Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report will be available
on or about May 1,[               ], 2017 through the Investors link on our website at
www.scientificgames.com or through www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.

 By Order of the Board of Directors
 
mqa04.jpg
    
 
Michael A. Quartieri
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Corporate Secretary


Dated: May 1,[               ], 2017








TABLE OF CONTENTS
General Information
4
Nominees for Election4
Corporate Governance8
Director Compensation12
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance15
Security Ownership15
Executive Compensation17
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Committee Report33
Summary Compensation Table34
Grants of Plan‑Based Awards for Fiscal Year 201635
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year‑End36
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 201638
2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation39
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control39
Equity Compensation Plan Information47
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions48
Proposal 2: Approval, on an Advisory Basis,48
50
Report50
Proposal 4: Ratification51
Fees Paid to Independent Auditor51
52

i



52
Appendix A - Reconciliation of SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA Minus CapEx to Net Loss54


ANNEX A – Reincorporation Merger Agreement
ANNEX B – Articles of Incorporation
ANNEX C – Bylaws


iii




SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
6650 S. El Camino6601 Bermuda Road
Las Vegas, NV  8911889119


PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement and Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders is furnished in connection with the solicitation byAgreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2017 (the “reincorporation merger agreement”), among SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation (“NewCo’) and the Board of DirectorsCompany. The reincorporation merger agreement contemplates that the Company will merge with and into NewCo, with NewCo being the surviving entity (the “Board”“reincorporation merger”) of Scientific Games Corporation (“Scientific Games,” the “Company,” “we” or “us”) of proxies to be voted at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. (local time) on Wednesday, June 14, 2017, at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North, Las Vegas, Nevada, and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders..

Notice and Access to Proxy Materials

We expect our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, and our 2016 Annual Report, to be made available to stockholders on or about May 1,[               ], 2017 through the Investors link on our website at www.scientificgames.com or through www.proxyvote.com. In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), most stockholders will not receive printed copies of these proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, most stockholders will receive by mail a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” that contains instructions as to how they can view our materials online, how they can request copies be sent to them by mail or electronically by email and how they can vote online (the “Notice”).

Stockholders Entitled to Vote

All stockholders of record at the close of business on April 18,[        ], 2017 are entitled to vote at the special meeting. At the close of business on April 18,[               ], 2017, 88,756,630[               ] shares of common stock were outstanding. Each share is entitled to one vote on all matters that properly come before the meeting.

Stock Ownership and Interests of Certain Persons

As of [               ], 2017, the record date for the special meeting, our directors and current executive officers owned, in the aggregate, [               ] shares of our common stock, or collectively approximately [               ]% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.  Our directors and current executive officers have informed us that they intend, as of the date hereof, to vote all of their shares of our common stock in favor of the adoption of the reincorporation merger agreement.

Certain members of our management and the Board have interests that may be different from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders generally. Such interests are related to differences in the substantive rights and protections available under Delaware and Nevada law, and corresponding provisions in the New Charter and New Bylaws that conform to Nevada law.  For more information, please read “The Reincorporation Merger—Interests of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Reincorporation Merger” beginning on page 5.

Voting Procedures

You may vote your shares by proxy without attending the meeting. You may vote your shares by proxy over the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you receive printed proxy materials, you can also vote by mail or telephone pursuant to instructions provided on the proxy card. If you are voting over the Internet or by telephone, you will need to provide the control number that is printed on the Notice or proxy card that you receive.

If you are the record holder of your shares, you may also vote your shares in person at the meeting. If you are not the record holder of your shares (i.e., they are held in “street” name by a broker, bank or other nominee), you must first obtain a proxy issued in your name from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.




Voting Matters

Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the annualspecial meeting:

Proposal Board’s Recommendation
Proposal 1: ElectionAdoption of Directorsthe Reincorporation Merger Agreement (page 4)3)FOR each Nominee
The
After due and careful discussion and consideration, our Board has unanimously determined that the reincorporation merger agreement and the Nominatingreincorporation merger are advisable, fair to and Corporate Governance Committee believe thatin the thirteen (13) director nominees possess a combinationbest interests of qualifications, experienceour stockholders, and judgment necessary for a well‑functioning Boardhas unanimously approved the reincorporation merger agreement and the effective oversight ofreincorporation merger, and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the Company.proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.
 
Proposal 2:  Approval, on an advisory basis,A proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Compensationspecial meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.  After due and careful discussion and consideration, our Board has unanimously determined that the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Company's Named Executive Officers (page 48)
FOR
The Company has designed its executive compensation programsspecial meeting to attractestablish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement, is advisable and retain executive talent, foster excellent business performance and align compensation within the long-termbest interests of our stockholders. The Boardstockholders, and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the Compensation Committee value stockholders' opinions and will take into accountproposal to adjourn the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
Proposal 3: To indicate, on an advisory basis, whether the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers should take place every year, every two yearsspecial meeting, if necessary or every three years (page 50)1 Year
The Company wishes to offer our stockholders the opportunity to provide the Company’s Compensation Committee more timely feedback about the appropriateness of the executive compensation of our named executive officers.
Proposal 4: Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as Independent Auditor (page 51)appropriate.
FOR
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte to serve as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. As a matter of good corporate governance, stockholders are being asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Deloitte.

All valid proxies received prior to the meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified by the stockholder. If a proxy card is returned without instructions, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote in accordance with the above recommendations of the Board.

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

Changing Your Vote

A stockholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its being voted by delivering written notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, by delivering a properly executed later‑laterdated proxy (including over the Internet or by telephone), or by voting in person at the meeting.

Quorum

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business.

Vote Required

Assuming a quorum is present, directors will be elected (Proposal 1) by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy atproposal to adopt the meeting.

Each of the other proposalsreincorporation merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of business on the record date. The proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock present and entitled to vote represented at the meeting.special meeting as of the record date, whether or not a quorum is present.

Effect of Withheld Votes or Abstentions

If you vote “WITHHOLD” in the election of directors or vote “ABSTAIN” (rather than vote “FOR” or “AGAINST”) with respect to any other proposal,, your shares will count as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors (Proposal 1),present and an “ABSTAIN” vote will have the effect of a negative vote on the other proposals (Proposals 2, 3proposal. If no instructions are indicated on your signed proxy card, all of your shares of our common stock will be voted “FOR” the adoption of the reincorporation merger agreement and 4).approval to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to establish a quorum or adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

2



Effect of Broker Non‑Votes

A broker “non‑“nonvote” occurs when a broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on that item and has not received specific instructions from the owner. If any broker “non‑“nonvotes” occur at the meeting, the broker “non‑“nonvotes” will count for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but will not have an effect on any proposals presented for your vote. A broker or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner may not vote these shares with respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1), advisory vote on approval of named executive officer compensation (Proposal 2) or indication, on an advisory basis,adoption of the frequency of future advisory approvals of named executive officer compensationreincorporation merger agreement (Proposal 3)1) or the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate (Proposal 2), without specific instructions from the beneficial owner as to how to vote with respect to such proposals. Brokers

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

In this Proxy Statement, we make “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results or strategies and can often be identified by the use of terminology such as “may”, “will”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue”, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “should”, “could”, “potential”, “opportunity”, “goal” or similar terminology. These statements are based upon management’s current expectations, assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of timing, future results or performance. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated in these statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other nominees will have discretionary voting powerfactors, including, among other things: our inability to vote without instructions fromcomplete the beneficial owner onreincorporation merger due to the ratificationfailure to obtain the required approvals, including adoption of the appointment of our independent auditor (Proposal 4) and, accordingly, your shares may be voted by your broker or nominee on Proposal 4 without your instructions.


PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board is electedreincorporation merger agreement by our stockholders, or otherwise; potential litigation relating to oversee the managementreincorporation merger; disruption of our current plans and operations in connection with the reincorporation merger, including departure of key personnel or inability to recruit additional qualified personnel or maintain relationships with customers, suppliers or other third parties; and costs, charges and expenses relating to the reincorporation merger. Additional information regarding risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in forward-looking statements is included from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our subsequent periodic reports. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and, except for our ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations.  Any or all of our forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong.  They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

All of the materials related to the reincorporation merger will be available at no charge from the SEC through its website at www.sec.gov.  Investors and security holders may also obtain free copies of the documents we filed with the SEC by contacting Scientific Games Corporation, 6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119, Attention: Corporate Secretary, telephone number (702) 532-7663.  For a more detailed description of the additional information available, please see “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 22.


MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING

PROPOSAL 1

ADOPTION OF THE REINCORPORATION MERGER AGREEMENT

THE REINCORPORATION MERGER

The following is a description of the material aspects of the reincorporation merger.  While we believe that the following description covers the material terms of the reincorporation merger, the description may not contain all of the information that is important to you.  We encourage you to read carefully this entire document, including the Agreement and Plan of Merger attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A for a more complete understanding of the reincorporation merger.  The following description is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the reincorporation merger agreement.

3


We have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with NewCo, a Nevada corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary, providing for the merger of the Company with and into NewCo with NewCo surviving the merger (the “Surviving Corporation”), for the sole purpose of changing the Company’s state of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada, including to approve the New Charter and New Bylaws.  The reincorporation merger agreement and the reincorporation merger were approved by our Board on September 17, 2017.  The reincorporation merger is subject to the approval of stockholders owning a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the special meeting.

The Parties

Scientific Games Corporation

Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is a leading diversified supplier of technology-based products and services to the gaming and lottery industriesIts portfolio includes instant and draw-based lottery games, gaming machines and game content, server-based lottery and gaming systems, sports betting technology, loyalty and rewards programs, and interactive products and servicesScientific Games Corporation generates revenue from the manufacturing and sale of instant lottery games, as well as the provision of value-added services such as game design, sales and marketing support, specialty games and promotions, inventory management and warehousing and fulfillment services.

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange (the “NASDAQ”) under the symbol “SGMS”.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located 6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119, its telephone number is (702) 532-7663 and its Internet website address is www.scientificgames.com.  The information provided on or accessible through the Company’s website is not part of this Proxy Statement and is not incorporated in this Proxy Statement by this or any other reference to its website provided in this Proxy Statement.

NewCo, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is a Nevada corporation that was formed on September 18, 2017, for the sole purpose of entering into the reincorporation merger agreement and completing the transactions contemplated by the reincorporation merger agreement, including the reincorporation mergerUpon the terms and subject to the conditions of the reincorporation merger agreement, the Company will merge with and into NewCo, with NewCo surviving the merger.

The principal executive offices of NewCo are located at 6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119, and its telephone number is (702) 532-7663.

Reasons for the Reincorporation Merger

Primarily, the reincorporation merger will allow us to better align our legal domicile with our global corporate headquarters and our primary U.S. manufacturing operations. Following the reincorporation merger, we will benefit from having our operational center, legal domicile and corporate office in Nevada, the gaming capital of the world, where we have strong roots and an extensive and growing employee base. The reincorporation merger will also allow us to stay closely connected to our base of gaming, lottery and interactive customers, many of whom are located in Nevada.

The reincorporation merger will also eliminate our obligation to pay the annual Delaware franchise tax which we expect will result in substantial savings to us over the long term.  For tax year 2016, we paid $180,000 in Delaware franchise taxes.  If we reincorporate in the State of Nevada, our current annual fees will consist of an annual business license fee of $500 and affairsan annual filing fee of $300.

In addition, the reincorporation in Nevada may help us attract and retain qualified management by reducing the risk of lawsuits being filed against the Company and its directors and officers.  We believe that for the reasons described below, in general, Nevada law provides greater protection to our directors, officers and the Company than Delaware law.  The increasing frequency of claims and litigation directed towards directors and officers has greatly expanded the risks facing directors and officers in general of public companies in exercising their duties. The amount of time and money required to respond to these claims and to defend this type of litigation can be substantial.  Delaware law provides that every person becoming a director of a Delaware corporation consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Delaware courts in connection with any action concerning the corporation.  Accordingly, a director can be personally sued in Delaware, even though the director has no other contacts with the state.  Similarly, Nevada law provides that every person who accepts election or appointment, including reelection or reappointment, as a director or officer of a Nevada corporation consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Nevada courts in connection with all civil actions or proceedings brought in Nevada by, on behalf of or against the entity in which the director or officer is a necessary or proper party, or in any action or proceeding against the director or officer for a violation of a duty in such capacity, whether or not the person continues to serve as a director or officer at the time the action or proceeding is commenced. We believe that the advantage of Nevada is that, unlike Delaware corporate law, much of which consists of judicial decisions that migrate and develop over time, Nevada has pursued a statute-focused approach that does not depend upon constant judicial supplementation and revision, and is intended to be stable, predictable and more efficient.

4



Also, reincorporation in Nevada will provide potentially greater protection for directors of the Company and, unlike Delaware, for officers as well.  Delaware law permits a corporation to adopt provisions limiting or eliminating the liability of a director to a company and its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that the liability does not arise from certain proscribed conduct, including breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law.  By contrast, Nevada law permits a broader exclusion of liability of both officers and directors to the Company and its stockholders, providing for an exclusion of all monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty unless they arise from acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.  The reincorporation will result in the elimination of any liability of an officer or director for a breach of the duty of loyalty unless arising from intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.  There is currently no known pending claim or litigation against any of our directors or officers for breach of fiduciary duty related to their service as directors or officers of the Company. The directors have an interest in the reincorporation to the extent that they will be entitled to such limitation of liability.

The reincorporation merger is not being effected to prevent a change in control, nor is it in response to any present attempt known to our Board serves as the ultimate decision‑making bodyto acquire control of the Company except for those matters reserved for or shared with stockholders. The Board appointsobtain representation on our executives, who are charged with conducting the business and affairsBoard.  Nevertheless, certain effects of the Company,proposed reincorporation may be considered to have anti-takeover implications by virtue of being subject to oversight byNevada law.  For a discussion of differences between the Board.laws of Delaware and Nevada, including differences that may have anti-takeover implications, please see “Comparative Rights of Stockholders Before and After the Reincorporation Merger” beginning on page 6.

Board of Directors and Management of the Surviving Corporation
Nominees for Election
The Board has nominated for election toboard of directors of the BoardSurviving Corporation will, from and after the thirteen (13) persons named below to serve for a one‑year term andeffective time, consist of the directors of the Company until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.  Except for Mr. Viet D. Dinh, eachThe officers of the director nominees is presently serving as a director. Additionally, except for Messrs. Kevin M. SheehanSurviving Corporation will, from and Viet D. Dinh, eachafter the effective time, be the officers of the Company until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified.

Interests of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Reincorporation Merger

Details of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s directors and executive officers of our nominees was previously electedcommon stock are set out in the section titled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” beginning on page 20. In considering the recommendation of the Board with respect to the Board by our stockholders. Mr. Sheehan was appointedreincorporation merger agreement, you should be aware that certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers have interests in the reincorporation merger that may be different from, or in addition to, our Board of Directors when he joined the Company as our Chief Executive Officer in August 2016. Mr. Dinh was recommended for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by someinterests of our non-employee directors. Four of the nominees (Messrs. Perelman, Meister and Schwartz and Ms. Townsend) were designated for election to the Board by MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, our largest stockholder, pursuant to its rights under a stockholders’ agreement with us (discussed more fully below). Pursuant to its rights under a stockholders’ agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated has the right to designate four nominees for election to the Board.
stockholders generally. The Board recommendswas aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in reaching the decision to approve the reincorporation merger agreement and recommend that youthe Company’s stockholders vote in favor of adopting the reincorporation merger agreement.

These interests are related to differences between the laws of Delaware and Nevada.  Delaware law does not afford the same substantive rights and protections available under Nevada law. Accordingly, the New Charter and New Bylaws, which are governed by Nevada law, differ in certain respects from the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Current Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Current Bylaws”), which are governed by Delaware law.  For example, the directors have an interest in the reincorporation to the extent that they will be entitled to limitation of personal liability, as discussed above under “—Reasons for the Reincorporation Merger”. For a comparison of stockholders’ rights and the powers of our management and Board before and after the reincorporation merger, please see “—Comparative Rights of Stockholders Before and After the Reincorporation Merger” beginning on page 6.

All of the Company’s rights and obligations under employment agreements with our executive officers will be assumed by the Surviving Corporation as a result of it being a successor to the Company.  The reincorporation merger will not be treated as a change in control under any such employment agreement or any of the Company’s equity compensation arrangements.

5



The Company is not aware of any other direct or indirect interests of our current directors or executive officers in the reincorporation merger as a result of reincorporation.

Consequences of the Reincorporation Merger

The reincorporation merger will effect a change in the legal domicile of the Company from Delaware to Nevada and changes by virtue of the Company being subject to Nevada law, the most significant of which are described below under “—Comparative Rights of Stockholders Before and After the Reincorporation Merger” beginning on page 6.  However, the reincorporation merger will not result in any change in headquarters, business, management, location of our offices, assets, liabilities or net worth, other than as a result of the costs incident to the reincorporation merger.  Our management, including all directors and officers, immediately prior to the reincorporation merger will remain the same in connection with the reincorporation merger and will assume identical positions with the Surviving Corporation.

Operating as a Nevada corporation will not interfere with, or differ substantially from, our present corporate activities.  As a Nevada corporation, we will be governed by Nevada corporate law, while the Company is currently governed by Delaware corporate law.  Nevada law may constitute a comprehensive, flexible legal structure under which to operate.  However, because of differences in the laws of these states, your rights as stockholders will change in several material respects as a result of the reincorporation.  These matters are discussed in greater detail below under “The Reincorporation Merger—Comparative Rights of Stockholders Before and After the Reincorporation Merger” beginning on page 6.

Holders of Surviving Corporation common stock will be entitled to equal voting rights, consisting of one vote per share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote.  The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Surviving Corporation entitled to vote will be required to constitute a quorum at any meeting of the Surviving Corporation.  A vote by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Surviving Corporation common stock will be required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to the New Charter.  In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, either voluntarily or involuntarily, each outstanding share of the Surviving Corporation common stock will be entitled to share equally in the assets of the Surviving Corporation.  Holders of the Surviving Corporation common stock will not have pre-emptive rights or conversion rights and there will be no redemption provisions applicable to Surviving Corporation common stock.

Potential Disadvantages of Reincorporation

A potential disadvantage of reincorporating from Delaware to Nevada is that Delaware for many years has followed a policy of encouraging incorporation in that state and, in furtherance of that policy, has adopted comprehensive, modern and flexible corporate laws that Delaware periodically updates and revises to meet changing business needs.  Because of Delaware’s prominence as a state of incorporation for many large corporations, the Delaware courts have developed considerable expertise in dealing with corporate issues and a substantial body of case law has developed construing Delaware law and establishing public policies with respect to Delaware corporations.  While Nevada also has encouraged incorporation in that state and adopted comprehensive, modern and flexible statutes that it periodically updates and revises to meet changing business needs, because Nevada case law concerning the effects of its statutes and regulations is more limited, the Company and its stockholders may experience less predictability with respect to legality of corporate affairs and transactions and stockholders’ rights to challenge them.  In addition, Nevada corporate law cases are heard in Nevada state district courts.  Unlike in Delaware, Nevada does not have a separate court with specific jurisdiction over corporate cases, but cases may be transferred to a judge with a “business court” designation.  While judges in Delaware’s Court of Chancery are appointed to 12-year terms by the Governor of the State of Delaware, the district court judges in Nevada are elected to six-year terms in mandatorily nonpartisan elections.  Note also that jury trials are available in corporate law cases in Nevada while in Delaware they are not.

Comparative Rights of Stockholders Before and After the Reincorporation Merger

Upon consummation of the reincorporation merger, the outstanding shares of our common stock will be converted into shares of Surviving Corporation common stock.  Consequently, our stockholders, whose rights as stockholders are currently governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) and the Current Charter and Current Bylaws, will become stockholders of the Surviving Corporation whose rights will be governed by the Nevada Revised Statutes (the “NRS”) and the New Charter and New Bylaws.
6



Key Changes in the Company’s Charter and Bylaws to be Implemented by the Reincorporation Merger

The New Charter and New Bylaws, attached hereto as Annex B and Annex C, respectively, differ in a number of respects from the Current Charter and Current Bylaws, respectively, copies of which have been filed with the SEC and are also available for inspection by our stockholders upon reasonable notice during regular business hours, at our principal executive offices at 6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119, Attention: Corporate Secretary.  The Current Charter and Current Bylaws are also available on the Investors link of our corporate website at www.scientificgames.com.

There are certain differences that may affect your rights as a stockholder, as well as the corporate governance of the Surviving Corporation.  The following are summaries of some of the more significant differences between the Current Charter and Current Bylaws of the Company, on the one hand, and the New Charter and New Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, on the other.  Except as described in this section, the rights of stockholders under the New Charter and New Bylaws are substantially the same as under the Company’s Current Charter and Bylaws.

The following discussion is a brief summary.  It does not provide a complete description of the differences that may affect you.  This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Current Charter and Current Bylaws of the Company, and the New Charter and New Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation.

Provisions
Nevada
Delaware
Charter regarding limitation on liability
The New Charter provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS, the liability of directors and officers of the Surviving Corporation shall be eliminated or limited. Note that, under the NRS, this provision does not exclude exculpation for breaches of duty of loyalty and covers both directors and officers.
The Current Charter provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, a director of the Company shall not be liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. Note that, under the DGCL, exculpation is not available for breaches of duty of loyalty and only covers directors.
Charter regarding distributions to stockholders
The New Charter provides that, in accordance with the NRS, the Surviving Corporation may make distributions to stockholders even when, after giving effect to the distribution, the Surviving Corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the Surviving Corporation were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution.
Under the DGCL, a surplus is required to declare a dividend.
Charter regarding the definition of “Disqualified Holder”The New Charter provides that any person who has withdrawn or requested the withdrawal of a pending application for any gaming license from any gaming authority in anticipation of such person being denied such gaming license or receiving such gaming license subject to materially burdensome or unacceptable terms or conditions shall also be a Disqualified Holder.The Current Charter’s definition of a Disqualified Holder does not cover this category.

7



Bylaws regarding proxiesThe New Bylaws provide that each proxy authorized by a stockholder shall be valid until its expiration or revocation in a manner permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. In Nevada proxies are valid for 6 months from the date of creation unless the proxy provides for a longer period of up to 7 years.The Current Bylaws provide that no proxy authorized by a stockholder shall be valid after three years from the date of its execution unless the proxy provides for a longer period.
Bylaws regarding removal of directorsAs permitted by Nevada law, the New Bylaws provide that any director may be removed from office at any special meeting of the stockholders either with or without cause by the vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, excluding stock entitled to vote only upon the happening of a fact or event unless such fact or event shall have occurred.Under the Current Bylaws directors may be removed from office at any special meeting of the stockholders either with or without cause by an affirmative vote of a majority of each class of voting shares.
Bylaws regarding director compensationAs permitted by Nevada law, the New Bylaws provide that director compensation established pursuant to the bylaws shall be presumed to be fair to the Surviving Corporation unless proven unfair by a preponderance of the evidence.Delaware law does not have a corresponding statute.
Bylaws regarding removal of director or officer determined to be a “Disqualified Holder”The New Bylaws provide that an officer or director of the Surviving Corporation who is determined to be a “Disqualified Holder” (as such term is defined in the New Charter) shall cease to qualify as a director or officer of the Surviving Corporation and the officer shall immediately cease to serve as such.The Current Bylaws do not contain a corresponding provision.
Bylaws regarding stockholder proposalsThe New Bylaws provide that a stockholder proposal may be considered at a meeting of stockholders if such proposal is properly requested to be brought before such meeting by a stockholder of the Surviving Corporation in accordance with New Bylaws, which requires the proposal be delivered to the secretary of the Surviving Corporation not earlier than the 120th day and not later than the 90th day prior to the meeting and the disclosure of certain information including the name and address of the stockholder, the number of shares directly or indirectly held by the stockholder and any other information relating to the stockholder, beneficial owner or a control person of the stockholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement.The Current Bylaws provide that no proposal or matter shall be considered or acted upon at any meeting of stockholders which has not been submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors.

8



Bylaws regarding committees of directorsAs permitted by the NRS, the New Bylaws provide that in the absence or disqualification of any member of a committee, the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not constituting a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in place of such absent or disqualified member.Current Bylaws do not contain a corresponding provision.
Bylaws regarding forum adjudication for disputesThe New Bylaws provide that the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for certain categories of actions brought by stockholders as specified in new bylaws.The Current Bylaws do not contain a corresponding provision.


Comparative Rights of Stockholders under Delaware and Nevada Law

The statutory corporate laws of the State of Nevada, as governed by the NRS, are similar in many respects to those of Delaware, as governed by the DGCL.  However, there are certain differences that may affect your rights as a stockholder, as well as the corporate governance of the Surviving Corporation.  The following are summaries of material differences between the current rights of stockholders of the Company and the rights of stockholders of the Surviving Corporation following the consummation of the reincorporation merger.

The following discussion is a brief summary.  It does not provide a complete description of the differences that may affect you.  This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the NRS and DGCL, as well as the forms of the New Charter and New Bylaws, which are attached as Appendices B and C, respectively, to this Proxy Statement, and which will come into effect concurrently with the consummation of the reincorporation merger.

Increasing or Decreasing Authorized Capital Stock.  The NRS allows the board of directors of a corporation, unless restricted by the articles of incorporation, to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares in a class or series of the corporation’s shares and correspondingly effect a forward or reverse split of any class or series of the corporation’s shares (and change the par value thereof) without a vote of the stockholders, so long as the action taken does not adversely change or alter any right or preference of the stockholders and does not include any provision or provisions pursuant to which only money will be paid or scrip issued to stockholders who hold 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the affected class and series, and who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractions of shares in exchange for the cancellation of all of their outstanding shares.  Delaware law has no similar provision.

Classified Board of Directors.  The DGCL permits any Delaware corporation to classify its board of directors into as many as three classes with staggered terms of office.  If this were done, the stockholders would elect only one class each year and each class would have a term of office of three years.  The Current Charter and Current Bylaws do not provide for a classified board of directors, and thus all directors are elected each year for one-year terms.

9



The NRS also permits any Nevada corporations to classify its board of directors into as many as four classes with staggered terms of office, where at least one-fourth of the directors must be elected annually.  The New Charter and New Bylaws also do not provide for a classified board of directors, and thus all directors will be elected each year for one-year terms following the consummation of the reincorporation merger.

Cumulative Voting.  Cumulative voting for directors entitles each stockholder to cast a number of votes that is equal to the number of voting shares held by such stockholder multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and to cast all such votes for one nominee or distribute such votes among up to as many candidates as there are positions to be filled.  Cumulative voting may enable a minority stockholder or group of stockholders to elect at least one representative to the board of directors where such stockholders would not be able to elect any directors without cumulative voting.

Although the DGCL does not generally grant stockholders cumulative voting rights, a Delaware corporation may provide in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation for cumulative voting in the election of eachdirectors. The NRS also permits any Nevada corporation to provide in its articles of incorporation the nominees named below as directors of the Company for the ensuing year, and the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card will vote the proxies received by them forright to cumulative voting in the election of each of the nominees unless otherwise specified on those proxy cards. All of the nominees have indicated a willingness to servedirectors as directors; however, if any nominee becomes unavailable to serve beforelong as certain procedures are followed.

The Current Charter does not provide for cumulative voting in the election proxies may be votedof directors.  Similarly, the New Charter does not provide for a substitute nominee selected by the Board, or the Board may decide to reduce the number of directors.
The name, age, business experience and certain other information regarding each of the nominees for director are set forth below.
Name AgePosition with the CompanyDirector Since
Ronald O. Perelman74Director (Chairman)2003
Kevin M. Sheehan63Director (Chief Executive Officer)2016
Richard M. Haddrill63Director (Executive Vice Chairman)2014
M. Gavin Isaacs52Director (Vice Chairman)2014
Peter A. Cohen70Director (Vice Chairman)2000
Gerald J. Ford72Director2005
David L. Kennedy70Director2009
Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald75Director2014
Paul M. Meister64Director2012
Michael J. Regan75Director2006
Barry F. Schwartz68Director2003
Frances F. Townsend55Director2010
Viet D. Dinh48Nominee 
Ronald O. Perelman was named Chairman of the Board in November 2013. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, a diversified holding company with interests in a diversified portfolio of public and private companies and various affiliates since 1980. Mr. Perelman is also Chairman of the Board of Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation.cumulative voting.

Kevin M. SheehanVacancies joined our Board of Directors in August 2016 when he was also appointed to.  Under both the position of Chief Executive OfficerDGCL and President. Mr. Sheehan served as Chief Executive Officer of NCL Corporation Ltd., a leading global cruise line operator (“Norwegian Cruise Line”), from November 2008 through January 2015 and as President of Norwegian Cruise Line from August 2010 through January 2015 (and previously from August 2008 through March 2009). Mr. Sheehan also served as Chief Financial Officer of Norwegian Cruise Line from November 2007 until September 2010. Before joining Norwegian Cruise Line, Mr. Sheehan served as a consultant to private equity firms, including Cerberus Capital Management LP and Clayton Dubilier & Rice. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Sheehan held various senior executive roles at Cendant Corporation, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the corporation’s Vehicle Services Division from January 2003 through May 2005, and Chief Financial Officer from March 2001 through May 2003. From 2015 through August 2016, Mr. Sheehan served as the John J. Phelan, Jr. Distinguished Professor at the Robert B. Willumstad School of Business at Adelphi University and from August 2005 to January 2008, Mr. Sheehan servedNRS, vacancies on the faculty of Adelphi University as a Distinguished Visiting Professor of accounting, finance and economics. Mr. Sheehan currently serves on the boards of directors of Dave & Buster’s Entertainment, Inc., where he has served since 2011; New Media Investment Group Inc. and its predecessor, where he has served since 2006; and Bob Evans Farms, Inc., where he has served since 2014.
Richard M. Haddrill was appointed Executive Vice Chairman of the Board in December 2014 following the Company’s acquisition of Bally Technologies, Inc. (“Bally”), where Mr. Haddrill had served as Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2012 and from May 2014 until November 2014. He served on Bally’s board of directors from 2003 untilduring the Bally acquisition, including serving as Chairmanyear may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Ballyremaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum.  Any director so appointed will hold office for the remainder of the term of the director no longer on the board.

Removal of Directors.  Under the DGCL, the holders of a majority of shares of each class entitled to vote at an election of directors may vote to remove any director or the entire board from 2012without cause unless (i) the board is a classified board, in which case directors may be removed only for cause, or (ii) the corporation has cumulative voting, in which case, if less than the entire board is to 2014. Priorbe removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his or her removal would be sufficient to joining Bally, Mr. Haddrill servedelect him.  Thus, under the DGCL, a director of a corporation that does not have a classified board or permit cumulative voting, such as Chief Executive Officerthe Company, may be removed, without cause, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an election of directors.

The NRS requires the vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares or class or series of shares of the issued and asoutstanding stock entitled to vote at an election of directors in order to remove a memberdirector or all of the directors.  Furthermore, the NRS does not make a distinction between removals for cause and removals without cause.  The articles of incorporation may provide for a higher voting threshold but not a lower one.

Fiduciary Duty and Business Judgment. Nevada, like most jurisdictions, requires that directors and officers of Nevada corporations exercise their powers in good faith and with a view to the interests of the corporation but, unlike other jurisdictions, fiduciary duties of directors and officers are codified in the NRS.  As a matter of law, directors and officers are presumed to act in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the corporation in making business decisions.  In performing such duties, directors and officers may exercise their business judgment through reliance on information, opinions, reports, financial statements and other financial data prepared or presented by corporate directors, officers or employees who are reasonably believed to be reliable and competent.  Professional reliance may also be extended to legal counsel, public accountants, advisers, bankers or other persons reasonably believed to be competent, and to the work of a committee (on which the particular director or officer does not serve) if the committee was established and empowered by the corporation’s board of directors, and if the committee’s work was within its designated authority and was about matters on which the committee was reasonably believed to merit confidence.  However, directors and officers may not rely on such information, opinions, reports, books of account or similar statements if they have knowledge concerning the matter in question that would make such reliance unwarranted.

Under Delaware law, members of the board of directors of Manhattan Associates, Inc., a global leader in software solutions to the supply-chain industry. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Powerhouse Technologies, Inc., a technology and gaming company involved in the video lottery industry and online lottery and pari-mutuel wagering systems. Mr. Haddrill also served onor any committee designated by the board of directors of JDA Software Group, Inc., a leading provider of end-to-end integrated retail and supply chain planning and execution solutions, through 2012.
M. Gavin Isaacs was appointed Vice Chairmanare similarly entitled to rely in good faith upon the records of the Board in August 2016corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports and statements presented to the corporation by corporate officers, employees, committees of the board of directors or other persons as to matters such member reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert competence, provided that such other person has been a memberselected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the Board since 2014. He previously served as Presidentcorporation.  Such appropriate reliance on records and Chief Executive Officerother information protects directors from liability related to decisions made based on such records and other information. Unlike Delaware law, Nevada law extends the statutory protection for reliance on such persons to corporate officers.

10



Flexibility for Decisions, including Takeovers.  Nevada provides directors with more discretion than Delaware in making corporate decisions, including decisions made in takeover situations.  Under Nevada law, director and officer actions taken in response to a change or potential change in control are granted the benefits of the Companybusiness judgment rule.  However, in the case of an action that impedes the rights of stockholders to vote for or remove directors, directors will only be given the advantage of the business judgment rule if the directors have reasonable grounds to believe a threat to corporate policy and effectiveness exists and the action taken that impedes the exercise of the stockholders’ rights is reasonable in relation to such threat.

In exercising their powers, including in response to a change or potential change of control, directors and officers of Nevada corporations may consider the effect of the decision on several corporate constituencies in addition to the stockholders, including the corporation’s employees, suppliers, creditors, customers, the economy of the state and nation, the interests of the community and society in general, and the long-term as well as short-term interests of the corporation and its stockholders, including the possibility that these interests may be best served by the continued independence of the corporation.  To underscore the discretion of directors and officers of Nevada corporations, the NRS specifically states that such directors and officers are not required to consider the effect of a proposed corporate action upon any constituent as a dominant factor.

The DGCL does not provide a similar list of statutory factors that corporate directors and officers may consider in making decisions.  In a number of cases, Delaware law has been interpreted to provide that fiduciary duties require directors to accept an offer from June 2014 until August 2016. Mr. Isaacsthe highest bidder regardless of the effect of such sale on the corporate constituencies other than the stockholders.  Thus, the flexibility granted to directors of Nevada corporations when making business decisions, including in the context of a hostile takeover, are greater than those granted to directors of Delaware corporations.

Limitation on Personal Liability of Directors and Officers.  The NRS and the DGCL each permit corporations to adopt provisions in their charter documents that eliminate or limit the personal liability of directors to the corporation or their stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a director’s fiduciary duty, subject to the differences discussed below.

Both jurisdictions preclude liability limitation for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct and for paying dividends or repurchasing stock out of other than lawfully available funds.  Unlike the DGCL, however, the NRS does not expressly preclude a corporation from limiting liability for a director’s breach of the duty of loyalty or for any transaction from which a director derives an improper personal benefit.  Alternatively, the NRS permits a corporation to renounce in its articles of incorporation any interest or expectancy to participate in specific or specified classes or categories of business opportunities.  In addition, the NRS provision permitting limitation of liability applies to both directors and officers and expressly applies to liabilities owed to creditors of the corporation.  Furthermore, under the NRS, it is not necessary to adopt provisions in the articles of incorporation limiting personal liability of directors as this limitation is provided by statute.

Finally, in Nevada, in order for a director or officer to be individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders or creditors for damages as a result of any act or failure to act, it must be proven that the directors’ or officers’ act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and that the breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.

Thus, the NRS provides broader protection from personal liability for directors and officers than the DGCL.

Indemnification.  The NRS and the DGCL each permit corporations to indemnify directors, officers, employees and agents in similar circumstances, subject to the differences discussed below.

In suits that are not brought by or in the right of the corporation, both jurisdictions permit a corporation to indemnify current and former directors, officers, employees and agents for attorneys’ fees and other expenses, judgments and amounts paid in settlement that the person actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the action, suit or proceeding.  The person seeking indemnity may recover as long as he or she acted in good faith and believed his or her actions were either in the best interests of or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation.  Under the NRS, the person seeking indemnity may also be indemnified if he or she is not liable for breach of his or her fiduciary duties.  Similarly, with respect to a criminal proceeding, the person seeking indemnification must not have had any reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

In derivative suits, a corporation in either jurisdiction may indemnify its directors, officers, employees or agents for expenses that the person actually and reasonably incurred.  A corporation may not indemnify a person if the person was adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless a court otherwise orders.

11

No corporation may indemnify a party unless it makes a determination that indemnification is proper.  Under the DGCL, the corporation through its stockholders, directors or independent legal counsel will determine that the conduct of the person seeking indemnity conformed with the statutory provisions governing indemnity.  Under the NRS, the corporation through its stockholders, directors or independent counsel must only determine that the indemnification is proper.

Advancement of Expenses.  Although the DGCL and NRS have substantially similar provisions regarding indemnification by a corporation of its officers, directors, employees and agents, the NRS provides broader indemnification in connection with stockholder derivative lawsuits, in particular with respect to advancement of expenses incurred by an accomplished gaming industry executiveofficer or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or other proceeding.

The DGCL provides that expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.  A Delaware corporation has the discretion to decide whether or not to advance expenses, unless its certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide for mandatory advancement.

In contrast, under the NRS, the articles of incorporation, the bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide that the corporation must pay advancements of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceedings upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.

Action by Written Consent of Directors.  Both the DGCL and NRS provide that, unless the articles or certificate of incorporation or the bylaws provide otherwise, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the directors or a committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of the board or committee, as the case may be, consent to the action in writing.

Actions by Written Consent of Stockholders.  Both the DGCL and NRS provide that, unless the articles or certificate of incorporation provides otherwise, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if the holders of outstanding stock having at least the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take the action at a meeting of stockholders consent to the action in writing.  In addition, the DGCL requires the corporation to give prompt notice of the taking of corporate action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent to those stockholders who did not consent in writing.  There is no equivalent requirement under the NRS.

The NRS also permits a corporation to prohibit stockholder action by written consent in lieu of a meeting of stockholders by including such prohibition in its bylaws.

The Current Bylaws provide that any stockholders may act by written consent if such consent is signed by holders of not less than the minimum number of votes that would be required to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.  The New Bylaws contain a substantially similar provision.

Dividends and Distributions.  Delaware law is more restrictive than Nevada law with morerespect to dividend payments.  Unless further restricted in the certificate of incorporation, the DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of either (i) surplus, or (ii) if no surplus exists, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year (provided that the amount of capital of the corporation is not less than 15 yearsthe aggregate amount of leadership experience. He servedthe capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets).  The DGCL defines surplus as Chief Executive Officerthe excess, at any time, of SHFL entertainment, Inc. from April 2011 through November 2013the net assets of a corporation over its stated capital.  In addition, the DGCL provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only when the company was acquired by Bally. Prior to joining SHFL entertainment, Inc., Mr. Isaacs served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Bally from 2006 through 2011. Prior to joining Bally, he held senior roles at Aristocrat Leisure Limited, including Head of Global Marketing and Business Development, Managing Director of Aristocrat’s London-based European subsidiary and President of Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Aristocrat’s Las Vegas-based subsidiary. Mr. Isaacs previously served as a Trustee and the Presidentcapital of the International Associationcorporation is not impaired and only if such redemption or repurchase would not cause any impairment of Gaming Advisors,the capital of the corporation.

The NRS provides that no distribution (including dividends on, or redemption or repurchases of, shares of capital stock) may be made if, after giving effect to such distribution, (i) the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or, (ii) except as otherwise specifically permitted by the articles of incorporation, the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed at the time of a dissolution to satisfy the preferential rights of preferred stockholders (the condition in this clause (ii), the “Balance Sheet Test”).  Directors may consider financial statements prepared on the basis of accounting practices that are reasonable in the circumstances, a fair valuation, including but not limited to unrealized appreciation and currentlydepreciation, and any other method that is Vice Chairmanreasonable in the circumstances. Pursuant to NRS 78.288(2)(b), in the New Charter, the Surviving Corporation is specifically allowed to make any distribution that otherwise would be prohibited by the Balance Sheet Test.

12



To date, the Company has not paid dividends on its shares of common stock.  The payment of dividends following the consummation of the reincorporation merger, if any, will be within the discretion of the board of directors of the American Gaming Association.
Peter A. Cohen has served as Vice ChairmanSurviving Corporation.  Our Board (which will be the board of directors of the Board since September 2004. Mr. CohenSurviving Corporation immediately following the reincorporation merger) does not anticipate that the Surviving Corporation will pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

Restrictions on Business Combinations.  Both Delaware and Nevada law provide certain protections to stockholders in connection with certain business combinations.  These protections can be found in NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, and Section 203 of the DGCL.

Under Section 203 of the DGCL, certain “business combinations” with “interested stockholders” of the Company are subject to a three-year moratorium unless specified conditions are met.  For purposes of Section 203, the term “business combination” is Chairman and Chief Executive Officerdefined broadly to include (i) mergers with or caused by the interested stockholder; (ii) sales or other dispositions to the interested stockholder (except proportionately with the corporation’s other stockholders) of Cowen Group, Inc.,assets of the corporation or a diversified financial services company. Mr. Cohen wassubsidiary equal to 10% or more of the aggregate market value of either the corporation’s consolidated assets or its outstanding stock; (iii) the issuance or transfer by the corporation or a founding partner and principalsubsidiary of Ramius LLC,stock of the corporation or such subsidiary to the interested stockholder (except for transfers in a private investment management firm formed in 1994 that was combined with Cowen in late 2009. Mr. Cohen servedconversion or exchange or a pro rata distribution or certain other transactions, none of which increase the interested stockholder’s proportionate ownership of any class or series of the corporation’s or such subsidiary’s stock); or (iv) receipt by the interested stockholder (except proportionately as a memberstockholder), directly or indirectly, of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation or a subsidiary.

The three-year moratorium imposed on business combinations by Section 203 of the DGCL does not apply if: (i) prior to the time on which such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder owns 85% of the corporation’s voting stock upon consummation of the transaction that made him or her an interested stockholder (excluding from the 85% calculation shares owned by directors who are also officers of the target corporation and shares held by employee stock plans that do not permit employees to decide confidentially whether to accept a tender or exchange offer); or (iii) at or after the time on which such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, the board approves the business combination and it is also approved at a stockholder meeting by at least two-thirds (66-2/3%) of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

In contrast, the NRS imposes a maximum moratorium of two years versus Delaware’s three-year moratorium on business combinations.  However, NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, regulate combinations more stringently.  First, an interested stockholder is defined as a beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power.  Second, the two-year moratorium can be lifted only by advance approval by a corporation’s board of directors, as opposed to Delaware’s provision that allows interested stockholder combinations with stockholder approval at the time of such combination.  Finally, after the two-year period, combinations remain prohibited unless (i) they are approved by the board of directors, the disinterested stockholders or 60% of the outstanding voting power not beneficially owned by the interested party and its affiliates and associates or (ii) the interested stockholders satisfy certain fair value requirements.  But note that these statutes do not apply to any combination of a corporation and an interested stockholder after the expiration of four years after the person first became an interested stockholder.

Companies are entitled to opt out of the business combination provisions of the DGCL and NRS.  The Company has not opted out of the business combination provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL.  In the New Charter, the Surviving Corporation does not opt out of the business combination provisions of NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive.

Acquisition of Controlling Interests.  In addition to the restrictions on business combinations with interested stockholders, Nevada law also protects the corporation and its stockholders from persons acquiring a “controlling interest” in a corporation.  The provisions can be found in NRS 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive.  Delaware law does not have similar provisions.

Pursuant to NRS 78.379, any person who acquires a controlling interest in a corporation may not exercise voting rights on any control shares unless such voting rights are conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested stockholders of the issuing corporation at a special meeting of such stockholders held upon the request and at the expense of the acquiring person.  NRS 78.3785 provides that a “controlling interest” means the ownership of outstanding voting shares of an issuing corporation sufficient to enable the acquiring person, individually or in association with others, directly or indirectly, to exercise (i) one fifth or more but less than one third, (ii) one third or more but less than a majority or (iii) a majority or more of the voting power of the issuing corporation in the election of directors, and voting rights must be conferred by a majority of the disinterested stockholders as each threshold is reached and/or exceeded.  In the event that the control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person acquires control shares with a majority or more of all the voting power, any stockholder, other than the acquiring person, who does not vote in favor of authorizing voting rights for the control shares is entitled to demand payment for the fair value of such person’s shares, and the corporation must comply with the demand.

13


NRS 78.378(1) provides that the control share statutes of the NRS do not apply to any acquisition of a controlling interest in an issuing corporation if the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation in effect on the 10th day following the acquisition of a controlling interest by the acquiring person provide that the provisions of those sections do not apply to the corporation or to an acquisition of a controlling interest specifically by types of existing or future stockholders, whether or not identified.  In addition, NRS 78.3788 provides that the control share statutes of the NRS apply only to a corporation that has 200 or more stockholders, at least 100 of whom are stockholders of record and residents of Nevada, and which does business directly or indirectly in Nevada.  NRS 78.378(2) provides that the corporation may impose stricter requirements if it so desires.

Stockholder Vote for Mergers and Other Corporate Reorganizations.  Under the DGCL, unless the certificate or articles of incorporation specifies a higher percentage, the stockholders of a corporation that is being acquired in a merger or selling substantially all of its assets must authorize such merger or sale of assets by vote of an absolute majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote.  The corporation’s board of directors must also approve such transaction.

Similarly, under the NRS, a merger or sale of all assets requires authorization by stockholders of the corporation being acquired or selling its assets by an absolute majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote, as well as approval of such corporation’s board of directors.  However it is not entirely clear under Nevada law if stockholder authorization is required for the sale of less than all of the assets of a corporation.  Although a substantial body of case law has been developed in Delaware as to what constitutes the “sale of substantially all of the assets” of a corporation, it is difficult to determine the point at which a sale of virtually all, but less than all, of a corporation’s assets would be considered a “sale of all of the assets” of the corporation for purposes of Nevada law.  It is likely that many sales of less than all of the assets of a corporation requiring stockholder authorization under Delaware law would not require stockholder authorization under Nevada law.

The DGCL and NRS have substantially similar provisions with respect to approval by stockholders of a surviving corporation in a merger.  The DGCL does not require a stockholder vote of a constituent corporation in a merger (unless the corporation provides otherwise in its certificate of incorporation) if (i) the plan of merger does not amend the existing certificate of incorporation, (ii) each share of stock of such constituent corporation outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger is an identical outstanding share after the effective date of merger and (iii) either no shares of the common stock of the surviving corporation and no shares, securities or obligations convertible into such stock are to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger, or the authorized unissued shares or treasury shares of the common stock of the surviving corporation to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any other shares, securities or obligations to be issued or delivered under such plan do not exceed 20% of the shares of common stock of such constituent corporation outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the merger.  The NRS does not require a stockholder vote of the surviving corporation in a merger under substantially similar circumstances.

The Current Charter does not require a higher percentage to vote to approve certain corporate transactions.  The New Charter also does not specify a higher percentage.

Appraisal or Dissenter’s Rights.  In both jurisdictions, dissenting stockholders of a corporation engaged in certain major corporate transactions are entitled to appraisal rights.  Appraisal rights permit a stockholder to receive cash equal to the fair market value of the stockholder’s shares (as determined by agreement of the parties or by a court) in lieu of the consideration such stockholder would otherwise receive in any such transaction.

Under Section 262 of the DGCL, appraisal rights are generally available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a Delaware corporation in a merger or consolidation, provided that no appraisal rights are available with respect to shares of any class or series of stock if, at the record date for the meeting held to approve such transaction, such shares of stock, or depositary receipts in respect thereof, are either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders, unless the stockholders receive in exchange for their shares anything other than shares of stock of the surviving or resulting corporation (or depositary receipts in respect thereof), or of any other corporation that is listed on a national securities exchange or held by more than 2,000 holders of record, cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depositary receipts described above or any combination of the foregoing.

14



In addition, Section 262 of the DGCL allows beneficial owners of shares to file a petition for appraisal without the need to name a nominee holding such shares on behalf of such owner as a nominal plaintiff and makes it easier than under Nevada law to withdraw from the appraisal process and accept the terms offered in the merger or consolidation.  Under the DGCL, no appraisal rights are available to stockholders of the surviving or resulting corporation if the merger did not require their approval.

The Current Charter and Current Bylaws do not provide for appraisal rights in addition to those provided by the DGCL.  Therefore, because our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market, and holders of our common stock will receive in the reincorporation merger only shares of Surviving Corporation common stock, which will be listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market, holders of our common stock will not be entitled to appraisal rights in the reincorporation merger with respect to their shares of our common stock.

Under the NRS, a stockholder is entitled to dissent from, and obtain payment for, the fair value of his or her shares in the event of (i) certain acquisitions of a controlling interest in the corporation, (ii) consummation of a plan of merger, if approval by the stockholders is required and the stockholder is entitled to vote on the merger or if the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent, (iii) a plan of exchange in which the corporation is a party or (iv) any corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the stockholders, if the articles of incorporation, bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares.

Holders of Chart Acquisition Corp. (which, assecurities that are listed on a resultnational securities exchange or traded in an organized market and held by at least 2,000 stockholders of record with a business combination,market value of at least $20,000,000 are generally not entitled to dissenter’s rights.  However, this exception is now known as Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc.) from 2013 to 2015. From November 1992 to May 1994, Mr. Cohen was Vice Chairmannot available if (i) the articles of incorporation of the board and a director of Republic New York Corporation, as well as a member of its executive management committee. Mr. Cohen was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shearson Lehman Brothers from 1983 to 1990.
Gerald J. Ford has been a financial institutions entrepreneur and private investor involved in numerous mergers and acquisitions of private and public sector financial institutions overcorporation issuing the past 30 years. Mr. Ford serves as chairman ofshares provide that such exception is not available, (ii) the boards of Hilltop Holdings Inc. and Freeport‑McMoRan Inc. During the past five years, Mr. Ford has also served as Chairman of the boards of Pacific Capital Bancorp and as a director of McMoRan Exploration Company and SWS Group, Inc.
David L. Kennedy has served as a director since 2009, including serving as a Vice Chairman from 2009 through 2016. Mr. D. Kennedy has been an employee of the Company, most recently serving as Executive Vice Chairman from June 2014 to August 2014. Previously, he served as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2013 to June 2014, and as Chief Administrative Officer from April 2011 until March 2012. During his 45-year business career, Mr. D. Kennedy held senior executive positions with Revlon, Inc. and The Coca‑Cola Company and affiliates. Most recently, in June 2016, he retired from his role as Senior Executive Vice President of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated. Mr. D. Kennedy also recently

retired from the boards of Revlon, Inc., where he had served as Vice Chairman since 2013 and as a director since 2006, and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, where he had served since 2006.
Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald is a former U.S. District Court judge. From 2001 until 2013, Judge McDonald served as a judge on the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, The Hague, The Netherlands. Judge McDonald served as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague for six years, and was President of the Tribunal from 1997 until 1999. Judge McDonald is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. During the past five years, Judge McDonald has also served as a director of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and the American Arbitration Association.
Paul M. Meister is President of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated. He is also co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Lane Partners, LLC, a private investment company with diverse investments in healthcare and distribution-related industries. Mr. Meister previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of inVentiv Health, Inc., a provider of commercial, consulting and clinical research services to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, until 2015. Mr. Meister was Chairman of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., a scientific instruments equipment and supplies company, from November 2006 until April 2007. He was previously Vice Chairman of Fisher Scientific International, Inc., a predecessor to Thermo Fisher, from March 2001 to November 2006, and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Scientific from March 1991 to March 2001. Prior to Fisher Scientific, Mr. Meister held executive positions with the Henley Group, Wheelabrator Technologies and Abex, Inc. Mr. Meister is a director of LKQ Corporation, Inc. and vTv Therapeutics Inc.
Michael J. Regan is a former Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer of KPMG LLP and was the lead audit partner for many Fortune 500 companies during his 40‑year tenure with KPMG. Mr. Regan is a memberresolution of the board of directors approving the plan of Lifetime Brands, Inc. Duringmerger, conversion or exchange expressly provide otherwise or (iii) the past five years, Mr. Regan has also servedholders of the class or series of stock are required under the plan of merger or exchange to accept for the shares anything except cash, shares of stock as described in NRS 92A.390(3) or a membercombination thereof.  The NRS prohibits a dissenting stockholder from voting his or her shares or receiving certain dividends or distributions after his or her dissent.  Like the Current Charter and Current Bylaws, the New Charter and New Bylaws do not provide for dissenter’s rights in addition to those provided by the NRS.

The mechanics and timing procedures vary somewhat between Delaware and Nevada but both require technical compliance with specific notice and payment protocols.

Special Meetings of the Stockholders.  The DGCL permits special meetings of stockholders to be called by the board of directors or by any other person authorized in the certificate of DynaVox Inc.incorporation or bylaws to call a special stockholder meeting.

In contrast, the NRS permits special meetings of stockholders to be called by the entire board of directors, any two directors or the President, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise.

Under the Current Bylaws, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the Secretary of the Company at the written request of the majority of our Board, by the Chairman of our Board, by the President of the Company or by the stockholders owning a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote.  The New Bylaws contain a substantially similar provision.

Barry F. SchwartzSpecial Meetings Pursuant to Petition of Stockholders.  The DGCL provides that a director or a stockholder of a corporation may apply to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware if the corporation fails to hold an annual meeting for the election of directors or there is no written consent to elect directors in lieu of an annual meeting for a period of 30 days after the date designated for the annual meeting or, if there is no date designated, within 13 months after the last annual meeting.

Nevada law is more restrictive.  Under the NRS, stockholders having not less than 15% of the voting interest may petition the district court to order a meeting for the election of directors if a corporation fails to call a meeting for that purpose within 18 months after the last meeting at which directors were elected.

Adjournment of Stockholder Special Meetings.  Under the DGCL, if a meeting of stockholders is adjourned due to lack of a quorum and the adjournment is for more than 30 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting.  At the adjourned meeting the corporation may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting.

15


In contrast, under the NRS, a corporation is not required to give any notice of an adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted at an adjourned meeting, other than by announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, unless the board fixes a new record date for the adjourned meeting or the meeting date is adjourned to a date more than 60 days later than the date set for the original meeting, in which case a new record date must be fixed and notice given.

Duration of Proxies.  Under the DGCL, a proxy executed by a stockholder will remain valid for a period of three years, unless the proxy provides for a longer period.

Under the NRS, a proxy is effective only for a period of six months, unless it is coupled with an interest or unless otherwise provided in the proxy, which duration may not exceed seven years.  The NRS also provides for irrevocable proxies, without limitation on duration, in limited circumstances.

Stockholder Inspection Rights.  The DGCL grants any stockholder or beneficial owner of shares the right, upon written demand under oath stating the proper purpose thereof, either in person or by attorney or other agent, to inspect and make copies and extracts from a corporation’s stock ledger, list of stockholders and its other books and records for any proper purpose.  A proper purpose is one reasonably related to such person’s interest as a stockholder.

Inspection rights under Nevada law are more limited.  The NRS grants any person who has been Vice Chairmana stockholder of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporatedrecord of a corporation for at least six months immediately preceding the demand, or any person holding, or thereunto authorized in writing by the holders of, at least 5 % of all of its outstanding shares, upon at least five days’ written demand the right to inspect in person or by agent or attorney, during usual business hours (i) the articles of incorporation, and various affiliates since December 2015. Mr. Schwartz was Executive Vice Chairmanall amendments thereto, (ii) the  bylaws and all amendments thereto and (iii) a stock ledger or a duplicate stock ledger, revised annually, containing the names, alphabetically arranged, of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporatedall persons who are stockholders of the corporation, showing their places of residence, if known, and various affiliatesthe number of shares held by them respectively. A Nevada corporation may require a stockholder to furnish the corporation with an affidavit that such inspection is for a proper purpose related to his or her interest as a stockholder of the corporation.

In addition, the NRS grants certain stockholders the right to inspect the books of account and records of a corporation for any proper purpose. The right to inspect the books of account and all financial records of a corporation, to make copies of records and to conduct an audit of such records is granted only to a stockholder who owns at least 15% of the issued and outstanding shares of a Nevada corporation, or who has been authorized in writing by the holders of at least 15% of such shares.  However, these requirements do not apply to any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders a detailed, annual financial statement or any corporation that has filed during the preceding 12 months all reports required to be filed pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Regulatory Matters

The receipt of approvals from October 2007regulatory authorities relating to December 2015. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and General Counselthe manufacture, operation or distribution of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated and various affiliates since 1993 and Senior Vice Presidentgaming equipment, systems, services or products or the conduct of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated and various affiliates from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Schwartzother gaming activities of the Company is a directorcondition to completion of Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Consumer Productsthe reincorporation merger (the “Gaming Approvals”). We intend to file any notification or application required as soon as reasonably practicable following the date of the reincorporation merger agreement.  Although we do not expect these regulatory authorities to raise any significant concerns in connection with their review of the reincorporation merger, there is no assurance that we will obtain all required Gaming Approvals, or that the Gaming Approvals will not include terms, conditions or restrictions that may have an adverse effect on the Company or, after completion of the reincorporation merger, the Surviving Corporation. During

While we believe that we will receive the past five years, Mr. Schwartz has also servedrequisite Gaming Approvals for the reincorporation merger, there can be no assurances regarding the timing of the Gaming Approvals, our ability to obtain the Gaming Approvals on satisfactory terms or the absence of litigation challenging these Gaming Approvals.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reincorporation

We intend the reincorporation merger to be a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  Assuming the reincorporation merger qualifies as a directortax-free reorganization, the holders of Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.
Frances F. Townsend is Executive Vice Presidentour common stock will not recognize any gain or loss under the U.S. federal income tax laws as a result of Worldwide Government, Legalthe consummation of the reincorporation merger, and Business Affairsneither will the Company nor the Surviving Corporation.  Each stockholder will have the same basis in Surviving Corporation common stock received as a result of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated. Shethe reincorporation as that holder has been with MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated since October 2010. Ms. Townsend was a corporate partnerin our common stock held at the law firmtime the reincorporation merger is consummated.  Each holder’s holding period in Surviving Corporation common stock received as a result of Baker Botts LLP from April 2009 to October 2010. Prior to that, shethe reincorporation merger will include the period during which such holder held our common stock at the time the reincorporation merger is consummated, provided the latter was Assistant to President George W. Bushheld by such holder as a capital asset at the time of consummation of the reincorporation merger.

16



This Proxy Statement only discusses U.S. federal income tax consequences and has done so only for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and chaired the Homeland Security Council from May 2004 until January 2008. Prior to serving the President, Ms. Townsend was the first Assistant Commandant for Intelligence forgeneral information.  It does not address all of the U.S. Coast Guardfederal income tax consequences that may be relevant to particular stockholders based upon individual circumstances or to stockholders who are subject to special rules, such as financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, dealers in securities, foreign holders or holders who acquired their shares as compensation, whether through employee stock options or otherwise.  This Proxy Statement does not address the tax consequences under state, local or foreign laws.

This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code, laws, regulations, rulings and spent 13 yearsdecisions in effect as of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of which are subject to differing interpretations and change, possibly with retroactive effect.  The Company has neither requested nor received a tax opinion from legal counsel or rulings from the Internal Revenue Service regarding the consequences of reincorporation.  There can be no assurance that future legislation, regulations, administrative rulings or court decisions would not alter the consequences discussed above.

You should consult your own tax advisor to determine the particular tax consequences to you of the reincorporation merger, including the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax laws.

Securities Act Consequences

The shares of Surviving Corporation common stock to be issued in exchange for shares of our common stock are not being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  In that respect, the Surviving Corporation is relying on Rule 145(a)(2) under the Securities Act, which provides that a merger that has as its sole purpose a change in a corporation’s domicile does not involve the sale of securities for purposes of the Securities Act.  After the reincorporation merger, the Surviving Corporation will be a publicly held company, and it will file with the SEC and provide to its stockholders the same type of information that we have previously filed and provided.  Stockholders, whose shares of our common stock are freely tradable before the reincorporation merger, will continue to have freely tradable shares of Surviving Corporation common stock.  Stockholders holding restricted shares of Surviving Corporation common stock will be subject to the same restrictions on transfer as those to which their present shares of our common stock are subject.  In summary, the Surviving Corporation and its stockholders will be in the same respective positions under the federal securities laws after the reincorporation merger as the Company and our stockholders prior to the reincorporation merger.

No Exchange of Stock Certificates Required

Stockholders are not required to exchange their stock certificates for new certificates representing shares of Surviving Corporation common stock.  New stock certificates representing shares of Surviving Corporation common stock will not be issued to a stockholder until such stockholder submits one or more existing certificates for transfer, whether pursuant to sale or other disposition.  However, stockholders (at their option and at their expense) may exchange their stock certificates for new certificates representing shares of Surviving Corporation common stock following the U.S. Departmenteffective time of Justice in various senior positions. She also servesthe reincorporation merger.

Accounting Treatment of the Reincorporation Merger

The reincorporation merger will be accounted for as a reverse merger whereby, for accounting purposes, the Company will be considered the accounting acquiror and the Surviving Corporation will be treated as the successor to the historical operations of the Company.  Accordingly, the historical financial statements of the Company, which previously have been reported to the SEC on numerous governmental advisoryForms 10-K and nonprofit boards. Ms. Townsend10-Q, among others, as of and for all periods through the date of this Proxy Statement, will be treated as the financial statements of the Surviving Corporation.

THE REINCORPORATION MERGER AGREEMENT

The following is a trustee onsummary of the material terms of the reincorporation merger agreement.  The description in this section and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Agreement and Plan of Merger attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A and incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.  This summary does not purport to be complete and may not contain all of the information about the reincorporation merger agreement that is important to you.  We encourage you to read the reincorporation merger agreement carefully and in its entirety because it is the legal document that governs the reincorporation merger.

17


Overview of Reincorporation Merger Agreement

The reincorporation merger agreement provides that we will merge with and into NewCo, with NewCo surviving the merger.  Pursuant to the reincorporation merger agreement, the Surviving Corporation will assume all assets and liabilities of the Company, including obligations under our outstanding indebtedness and contracts.  Our existing Board and officers will be the board of directors and officers of the New York City Police FoundationSurviving Corporation for identical terms of office.

At the effective time of the reincorporation merger, each outstanding share of our common stock will automatically be converted into one share of Surviving Corporation common stock.  You will not have to exchange your existing stock certificates of the Company for stock certificates of the Surviving Corporation.  However, after consummation of the reincorporation merger, any stockholder desiring a new form of stock certificate (at their option and at their expense) may submit the existing stock certificate to the Surviving Corporation’s transfer agent for cancellation and obtain a new Nevada form of certificate.

The reincorporation merger agreement was unanimously approved and adopted by our Board, the board of NewCo and by the Company as the sole stockholder of NewCo.  The reincorporation merger agreement and the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum. She is alsoreincorporation merger are subject to approval by the affirmative vote of holders of a membermajority of the Council on Foreign Relationsoutstanding shares of our common stock at the special meeting and the Trilateral Commission. Ms. Townsend is a director of The Western Union Companyreincorporation merger cannot be effectuated until we have received all prior approvals required under gaming laws and Freeport McMoRan Inc. During the past five years, Ms. Townsend has also served as a director of SIGA Technologies, Inc.regulations.
Viet D. Dinh, nominee, is a partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, an international law firm providing legal advice in the areas of complex litigation, corporate and tax law, intellectual property, restructuring and other general counseling matters. Mr. Dinh has also served as a Professional Lecturer in Law focusing on corporations and constitutional law and a Distinguished Lecturer in Government at Georgetown University since 2014. Previously, he served as a tenured law professor at Georgetown University from 1996 to 2014. Prior to joining Kirkland & Ellis in 2016, Mr. Dinh was a partner at Bancroft PLLC, a law and strategic consulting firm which he founded in 2003. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Dinh served as Assistant Attorney General for Legal Policy at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he played a key role in developing legal policy initiatives to combat terrorism, including the USA Patriot Act. Mr. Dinh has served
Termination; Effects on the boards of directors of the following publicly traded companies within the last five years: Revlon, Inc. (since 2012); Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. (since 2013), where he serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; News Corporation (from 2004 to 2013); and LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. (since 2015), where he serves as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.Company if Reincorporation Merger Is Not Completed

Designees of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated
Messrs. Perelman, MeisterThe reincorporation merger agreement may be terminated and Schwartz and Ms. Townsend were designated for election to the Boardabandoned by MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated pursuant to its rights under a stockholders’ agreement with us dated September 6, 2000, as supplemented by agreements dated June 26, 2002, October 10, 2003 and February 15, 2007. The stockholders’ agreement was originally entered into with holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the initial issuance of such preferred stock and provides for, among other things, the right of the holders to designate up to four membersaction of our Board based on their ownership of preferred stock orat any time prior to the common stock issued upon conversion thereof. Alleffective time of the preferred stock was converted into common stockreincorporation merger, if our Board determines for any reason, in August 2004. MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, which owned approximately 92%its sole judgment and discretion, that the consummation of the preferred stock prior to conversion and currently owns approximately 38.96% of our outstanding common stock, currently has the right to designate up to four directors based on its level of share ownership. The percentages that mustreincorporation merger would be maintained in order to designate directors are as follows: (a) 20% to designate four directors; (b) 16% to designate three directors; (c) 9% to designate two directors; and (d) 4.6% to designate one director. Such percentages, in each case, are to be determined based on our fully diluted common stock subject to certain exclusions of common stockinadvisable or other securities that may be issuednot in the future.
Qualifications of Directors
Our directors are responsible for overseeing the management of the Company’s business and affairs, which requires highly skilled and experienced individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and making recommendations to the Board concerning the appropriate size and needs of the Board with the objective of maintaining the necessary experience, skills and independence on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that there are general qualifications that are applicable to all directors and other skills and experience that should be represented on the Board as a whole, but not necessarily by each director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider the experience and qualifications of prospective directors individually and in the context of the Board’s overall composition.
In its assessment of prospective directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board generally consider, among other factors, the individual’s character and integrity, experience, judgment, independence and ability to work collegially, as well as the ability of a potential nominee to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also assess particular qualifications, attributes, skills and experience that they believe are important to be represented on the Board as a whole, in light of the Company’s business. These include a high level of financial literacy, relevant chief executive officer or similar leadership experience, gaming, lottery and interactive gaming industry experience, experience with global operations, exposure to the development and marketing of technology and consumer products, and legal and regulatory experience.
As a matter of practice, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also consider the diversity of the backgrounds and experience of prospective directors as well as their personal characteristics (e.g., gender, ethnicity, age) in evaluating, and making decisions regarding, Board composition, in order to facilitate Board deliberations that reflect a broad range of perspectives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that the Board is comprised of a diverse group of individuals.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that each nominee has valuable individual skills and experiences that, taken together, provide the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and vision necessary for the effective oversight of the Company. As indicated in the foregoing biographies, the nominees have extensive experience in a variety of fields, including gaming, lottery and interactive gaming (Messrs. Isaacs, Haddrill and a number of our other long‑serving directors), global operations (all directors), technology (Messrs. Isaacs, Haddrill, D. Kennedy and Meister), consumer products and marketing (Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs, Haddrill, D. Kennedy, Perelman and Schwartz), legal and regulatory (Messrs. Isaacs, Schwartz and Dinh and Madams Townsend and McDonald), investment and financial services (Messrs. Cohen, Ford, D. Kennedy, Meister, Perelman and Schwartz) and public accounting (Mr. Regan), each of which the Board believes provides valuable knowledge about important elements of our business. Most of our nominees have leadership experience at major companies or organizations that operate inside and outside the United States and/or experience on other companies’ boards, which provides an understanding of ways other companies address various business matters, strategies, corporate governance and other issues. As indicated in the foregoing biographies, the nominees have each demonstrated significant leadership skills, including as a chief executive officer (Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs, Haddrill, D. Kennedy, Cohen, Ford, Meister, Perelman and Schwartz), as a chief administrative officer of a major accounting firm (Mr. Regan), as chair of the Homeland Security Council and an officer in the U.S. Coast Guard (Ms. Townsend) and as a judge on an international criminal tribunal (Judge McDonald). Mr. Dinh and Ms. Townsend have extensive public policy, government or regulatory experience, which can provide valuable

insight into issues faced by companies in regulated industries such as that of the Company. Mr. Isaacs has served as a senior executive and director of other gaming companies, which service has given him a deep knowledgebest interests of the Company and our stockholders.
If our stockholders do not adopt the reincorporation merger agreement or if the reincorporation merger agreement is terminated by the Company in accordance with its businessesterms, the shares and directly relevant management experience. Mr. Sheehan has experience in the travel and leisure industry, providing him with insight into issues facing our customers. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that these skills and experiences, together with their other qualities, qualify each nominee to serve as a director of the Company.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE THIRTEEN (13) NOMINEES

Corporate Governance
Overview. The Company is committed to good corporate governance, which we believe promotes the long‑term interestssecurities of our stockholders will not be converted to shares or other securities of the Surviving CorporationInstead, we will remain a Delaware corporation, and strengthens Board and management accountability. Highlightsour stockholders will continue to be subject to the same rights as they currently are with respect to their ownership of our corporate governance structure and policies include:
Corporate Governance Highlights
• Annual election of all directors• Cash and equity compensation clawback policy
• Nine independent director nominees• Anti-hedging policy
• Entirely independent Board committees (other than Executive and Finance Committee and Compliance Committee)• Executive compensation based on pay-for-performance philosophy
• Regular executive sessions of independent directors• Code of Business Conduct (and related training)
• Separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles• Stockholder right to call special meetings
• Regular Board and committee self‑evaluations• Stockholder right to act by written consent
• Director and officercommon stock ownership guidelines• Absence of rights plan and other “anti‑takeover” provisions
• Risk management oversight by the Board and committees
Director Independence. The Board has adopted Director Independence Guidelines as a basis for determining that individual directors are independent under the standardsDGCL and the Current Charter and Current Bylaws.
Conversion of Common Stock and Other Securities

At the date and time that the reincorporation merger becomes effective (the “effective time”), holders of our common stock, options and other securities immediately prior to the effective time will be entitled to the same number of shares of common stock, options and other securities of the NASDAQ Stock Market. This determination, which is made annually, helps assure the qualitySurviving Corporation as they held of the Board’s oversight of management and reducesCompany immediately prior to the possibility of damaging conflicts of interest. Under these standards, a director will not qualify as independent if:effective time.  The reincorporation merger agreement provides that, at the effective time,
(1)the director has been employed by the Company (or any subsidiary) at any time within the past three years, other than service as an interim executive officer for a period of less than one year;
(2)the director has an immediate family member who has been employed as an executive officer of the Company (or any subsidiary) at any time within the past three years;
(3)the director or an immediate family member of the director has accepted any compensation (including any political contribution to a director or family member) from the Company (or any subsidiary) in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the past three years other than (a) for Board or Board committee service, (b) in the case of the family member, as compensation for employment other than as an executive officer, (c) benefits under a tax‑qualified retirement plan or non‑discretionary compensation, or (d) compensation for service as an interim executive officer for a period of less than one year;
(4)the director or an immediate family member of the director is a partner, controlling shareholder or executive officer of an organization (including a charitable organization) that made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in the current year or in any of the past three years that exceed the greater of 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues or $200,000, other than (a) payments arising solely from investments in the Company’s securities or (b) payments under non‑discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;
(5)the director or an immediate family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of the Company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

(6)each share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the director or an immediate family membereffective time (other than shares canceled pursuant in accordance with the terms of the director is a current partnerreincorporation merger agreement, as described in the third bullet in this section) will be converted (without the surrender of stock certificates or any other action by NewCo, the Company or the stockholders of the Company’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employeeCompany) into one fully paid and non-assessable share of the Company’s outside auditor who worked on the Company’s audit at any time during anySurviving Corporation, and all shares of the past three years.
In applying these standards, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Cohen, Ford, Meister, Perelman, Regan, Schwartz and Dinh, and Madams Townsend and McDonald, qualify as independent directors, and none has a business or other relationship that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. In connection with their analysis, the Board considered the fact that the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, although not Mr. Dinh, who is partner, on certain legal matters and determined that this existing relationship would not interfere with Mr. Dinh's exercise of independent judgment. Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs, Haddrill and D. Kennedy do not qualify as independent directors.
The full text of the Board’s Director Independence Guidelines, including information on the additional independence requirements applicable to Board committee members, can be accessed through the Investors—Corporate Governance link on our website at www.scientificgames.com.
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that outline the structure, role and functioning of the Board and address various governance matters including director independence, the Board selection process, length of Board service, Board meetings and executive sessions of independent directors, Board and committee performance evaluations and management succession planning. The full text of these guidelines can be accessed through the Corporate Governance link in the Investors section of our website at www.scientificgames.com.
Board Leadership Structure. As described above, the Board is comprised entirely of independent directors, other than Mr. Sheehan, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Isaacs, our former President and Chief Executive Officer from 2014 to 2016, Mr. D. Kennedy, our former President and Chief Executive Officer during 2014, and Mr. Haddrill, our Executive Vice Chairman. The Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are comprised entirely of independent directors. The Executive and Finance Committee is comprised of independent directors and non-independent directors, and the Compliance Committee is comprised of independent directors, a non-independent director and an industry consultant. The Board has the flexibility to select the leadership structure that is most appropriate for the Company and its stockholders and has determined that the Company and its stockholders are best served by not having a formal policy regarding whether the same individual should serve as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. This approach allows the Board to elect the most qualified director as Chairman of the Board, while maintaining the ability to separate the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles when deemed appropriate. The Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles are currently held by two different individuals.
Messrs. Isaacs and Cohen serve as Vice Chairmen of the Board, Mr. Haddrill serves as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board, and the Board has also designated Mr. Cohen as the lead independent director. When the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are held by the same individual, Mr. Cohen’s lead independent director responsibilities include presiding over regularly held executive sessions of independent directors, facilitating communication between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer, and coordinating the activities of the independent directors. Mr. Cohen also provides assistance to the Board and the committees of the Board in their evaluations of management’s performance, and he carries out other duties that the Board assigns to him from time to time in areas of governance and oversight.
The Executive and Finance Committee, which includes four independent directors (Messrs. Meister, Perelman, Cohen and Schwartz) as well as Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs and Haddrill, meets as needed to support the Board in the performance of its duties between regularly scheduled Board meetings, to implement the policy decisions of the Board and to provide strategic guidance and oversight to the Company.
The Board believes its current leadership structure is appropriate because it effectively allocates authority, responsibility and oversight between management and the independent members of the Board.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight. The Board is responsible for overseeing management in the execution of its responsibilities and for assessing the Company’s approach to risk management. The Board exercises these responsibilities on an ongoing basis as part of its meetings and through the Board’s committees, each of which examines various components of enterprise risk as part of its responsibilities. An overall review of risk is inherent in the Board’s consideration of the Company’s strategies and other matters presented to the Board, including financial matters, investments, acquisitions and divestitures. The Board’s role in risk oversight is consistent with the Company’s leadership structure, with the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management having responsibility for managing the Company’s risk exposure, and the Board and its committees providing oversight of those efforts.

The Company has implemented internal processes and controls to identify and manage risks and to communicate with the Board regarding risk management. These include an enterprise risk management program, regular internal management meetings that identify risks and discuss risk management, a Code of Business Conduct (and related training), a strong ethics and compliance function that includes suitability reviews of customers, partners, vendors and other persons/entities with which the Company does business, an internal and external audit process, internal approval and signature authority processes and legal department review of contracts. In connection with these processes and controls, management regularly communicates with the Board, Board committees and individual directors regarding identified risks and the management of these risks. Individual directors often communicate directly with senior management on matters relating to risk management. In particular, the Board committee chairmen regularly communicate with members of senior management, including Mr. Sheehan, to discuss potential risks in connection with accounting and audit matters, compensation matters, compliance matters and financing‑related matters.
The Board committees, which meet regularly and report to the full Board, play significant roles in carrying out the Board’s risk oversight function. In particular, the Audit Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s financial statements, the financial reporting process, accounting and certain legal matters. The Audit Committee also oversees the internal audit function and regularly meets in private with both the Vice President of Internal Audit (who reports functionally to the Chief Financial Officer and has a direct reporting line to the Audit Committee) and representatives of the Company’s independent auditing firm. The Compensation Committee evaluates risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs and discusses with management procedures to identify and mitigate such risks. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Program as it Relates to Risk” below. The Compliance Committee is active in overseeing the Company’s program with respect to compliance with the laws applicable to the Company’s business, including gaming laws, as well as compliance with our Code of Business Conduct ("Code") and related policies by employees, officers, directors and other representatives of the Company. In addition, the Compliance Committee oversees a compliance review process, which is designed to ensure that the vendors, consultants, customers and business partners of the Company are “suitable” or “qualified” as those terms are used by applicable gaming and lottery authorities, and regularly meets separately with the Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Director of Security (who reports functionally to the Chief Executive Officer and has a direct reporting line to the Compliance Committee).
Board Meetings. The Board held a total of five meetings during 2016, including two at which executive sessions were held with no members of management present. During 2016, all incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served.
Board Committees. The Board has five committees: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; the Compliance Committee; the Executive and Finance Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All committees are comprised solely of independent directors with the exception of the Executive and Finance Committee, which is comprised of four independent directors as well as Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs and Haddrill, and the Compliance Committee, which is comprised of three independent directors and Mr. Sheehan, a director and our Chief Executive Officer, as well as Patricia Becker, a gaming industry consultant. The Board has approved charters for each Board committee, which can be accessed through the Investors—Corporate Governance link on our website at www.scientificgames.com. The current membership of each committee is as follows:
Audit CommitteeCompensation CommitteeCompliance CommitteeExecutiveCompany common stock will be canceled and Finance CommitteeNominatingretired and Corporate Governance Committee
Michael J. Regan (Chair)Peter A. Cohen (Chair)Barry F. Schwartz (Chair)Paul M. Meister (Chair)Gerald J. Ford (Chair)
Peter A. CohenPaul M. MeisterKevin M. SheehanRonald O. PerelmanMichael J. Regan
Gerald J. FordBarry F. SchwartzGabrielle K. McDonaldKevin M. SheehanFrances F. Townsend
Frances F. TownsendRichard M. Haddrill
Patricia BeckerM. Gavin Isaacswill cease to exist;
   
Peter A. Cohenthe Surviving Corporation will assume the sponsorship of the Company’s equity compensation plans as the Company’s successor, and all rights of participants to acquire shares of Company common stock under the Company’s equity compensation plans and award agreements will be converted into rights to acquire shares of Surviving Corporation common stock on the same terms and conditions applicable prior to the reincorporation merger, including with respect to vesting and forfeiture conditions;
   
Barry F. Schwartzwith respect to the number of Company common shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans, an equal number of shares of Surviving Corporation common stock will be so reserved;

18




each preferred stock purchase right issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2017, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (as may be amended, the “Rights Agreement”) will remain outstanding as and convert into a right to acquire preferred stock of the Surviving Corporation to be designated pursuant to the Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in the form attached to the reincorporation merger agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in the Rights Agreement; and
 
each share of common stock of NewCo, par value $0.001, registered in the name of the Company will be reacquired by the Surviving Corporation and canceled and retired, and will resume the status of authorized and unissued Surviving Corporation common stock. No shares of Surviving Corporation common stock or other securities of the Surviving Corporation will be issued in respect of such cancelation.

Following the consummation of the reincorporation merger, the authorized capital stock of the Surviving Corporation will consist of 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001.  Our authorized capital stock currently consists of 199,300,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 700,000 shares of Class B Nonvoting Common Stock, par value $0.01; and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share.  No shares of preferred stock or Class B Nonvoting Common Stock are currently outstanding.

Audit Committee.Conditions to the Reincorporation Merger

The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring the Company’s independent auditor and for overseeing the accounting, auditing and financial reporting processesrespective obligation of the Company. InCompany and NewCo to effectuate the course of performing its functions, the Audit Committee reviews, with management and the independent auditor, the Company’s internal accounting controls, the financial statements, the report and recommendationsreincorporation merger is subject to satisfaction of the independent auditor,following conditions:

the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock shall have adopted the reincorporation merger agreement; and
any and all approvals and consents deemed in the sole discretion of the Company to be material to the consummation of the reincorporation merger shall have been obtained and shall be in full force and effect, including, without limitation certain regulatory and gaming approvals.

We, as the scopesole stockholder of NewCo, have approved the reincorporation merger agreement.  As a result, no further stockholder approval is required from NewCo.

Effective Time

It is anticipated that the reincorporation merger, and consequently our reincorporation from Delaware to Nevada, will become effective at the date and time specified in each of (i) the Articles of Merger to be executed and filed with the office of the audit,Nevada Secretary of State in accordance with NRS 92A.200 and (ii) the qualificationsCertificate of Merger to be executed and independencefiled with the Office of the auditor. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s internal audit function. The Board has determined that each memberSecretary of State of Delaware in accordance with Section 252 of the Audit Committee is independentDGCL.

NO APPRAISAL RIGHTS

Appraisal rights are statutory rights that, if applicable under law, enable stockholders to dissent from an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, and to demand that the corporation pay the fair value for their shares as determined by a court in a judicial proceeding instead of receiving the consideration offered to stockholders in connection with the extraordinary transaction.  Appraisal rights are not available in all circumstances, and exceptions to these rights are provided under the listing standardsDGCL.

Section 262 of the DGCL provides that stockholders have the right, in some circumstances, to dissent from certain corporate actions and to instead demand payment of the fair value of their shares.  Stockholders do not have appraisal rights with respect to shares of any class or series of stock if, at the record date for the meeting held to approve such transaction, such shares of stock, or depositary receipts in respect thereof, are either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders, unless the stockholders receive in exchange for their shares anything other than shares of stock of the surviving or resulting corporation (or depositary receipts in respect thereof), or of any other corporation that is listed on a national securities exchange or held by more than 2,000 holders of record, cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depositary receipts described above or any combination of the foregoing.  In addition, neither the Current Charter nor the Current Bylaws contain any additional provisions relating to dissenters’ rights of appraisal.  Therefore, because our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market, and that

Mr. Regan qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee held seven meetings during 2016.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee sets the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives of the Company, administers the equity incentive plans and executive compensation programs of the Company, determines eligibility for, and awards under, such plans and programs, and makes recommendations to the Board with regard to the adoption of new employee benefit plans and equity incentive plans and with respect to the compensation program for non‑employee directors. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Compensation Committee held five meetings during 2016.
Compliance Committee. The Compliance Committee is responsible for providing oversight of the Company’s program with respect to compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the business of the Company, including gaming and anticorruption laws, and with respect to compliance with the Code of Business Conduct by employees, officers, directors and other representatives of the Company. The Compliance Committee held four meetings during 2016.
Executive and Finance Committee. The Executive and Finance Committee has broad authority to act on behalf of the Board in the oversight of the business and affairs of the Company and assists the Board in implementing Board policy decisions as requested by the Board from time to time. The Executive and Finance Committee held two meetings during 2016.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals who are qualified to become directors, recommending nominees for membership on the Board and on committees of the Board, reviewing and recommending corporate governance principles, procedures and practices and overseeing the annual self‑assessments of the Board and its committees. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during 2016.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have specific qualifications that must be met by a candidate for director and will consider individuals suggested as candidates by stockholders. A stockholder wishing to propose a nominee for director should submit a recommendation in writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at least 120 days before the anniversary of the mailing date of the proxy materials applicable to the prior year’s annual meeting, indicating the nominee’s qualifications and other relevant biographical information and providing confirmation of the nominee’s consent to serve as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review the candidate’s background, experience and abilities, and the contributions the candidate can be expected to make to the collective functioning of the Board and the needs of the Board at the time. In prior years, candidates have been identified through recommendations made by directors, the Chief Executive Officer and other third parties. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee anticipates that it would use these sources as well as stockholder recommendations to identify candidates in the future.
Stockholder Communications with Directors. Stockholders may communicate with the Board or an individual director by sending a letter to the Board or to a director’s attention care of the Corporate Secretary of the Company at Scientific Games Corporation, 6650 S. El Camino Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118. The Corporate Secretary will open, log and deliver all such correspondence (other than advertisements, solicitations or communications that contain offensive or abusive content) to directors on a periodic basis, generally in advance of each Board meeting.

Attendance at Stockholders’ Meetings. The Company encourages directors to attend the annual stockholders’ meeting. Last year, all eleven directors then serving attended the annual meeting.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. None of the Compensation Committee members (i) has ever been an officer or employee of the Company or (ii) was a participant in a “related person” transaction in 2016. None of the Company’s executive officers serves, or in 2016 served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.

Code of Ethics. The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct (the "Code") that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees. The Code sets forth fundamental principles of integrity and business ethics and is intended to ensure ethical decision making in the conduct of professional responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Code are standards

concerning conflicts of interest, confidential information and compliance with laws, regulations and policies. The full text of the Code can be accessed through the Corporate Governance link in the Investors section of our website at www.scientificgames.com.

Director Compensation
Non-Employee Director Compensation. The compensation program for non‑employee directors consists of annual retainers and equity awards. Under the director compensation program, in 2016, non-employee directors were eligible to receive:
(1)an annual retainer for service by non‑employee directors on the Board of $75,000;
(2)an annual committee retainer (in lieu of fees per committee meeting) of $10,000 ($15,000, in the case of the Audit Committee) per committee (excluding for service on the Executive and Finance Committee);
(3)annual retainers for the chairs of the Compliance Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of $20,000 (and an annual retainer for the chair of the Audit Committee of $35,000); and
(4)annual grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to eligible non-employee directors with a grant date value of $160,000 and a four-year vesting schedule, provided such director satisfied the Board���s attendance requirement for the prior calendar year, as discussed below.
During 2016, Mr. Cohen received $250,000 for his service as a Vice Chairman of the Board without any additional retainers for his service on the Executive and Finance Committee or as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. New non-employee directors, such as Mr. Dinh, if elected, will receive stock options for 10,000 shares (with a four‑year vesting schedule) upon joining the Board. Directors who are employed by the Company do not receive any additional compensation in connection with their services as directors.
The elements of the director compensation program are evaluated and determined by the Compensation Committee, which takes into account competitive director compensation data provided by Compensation Advisory Partners, LLC (“CAP”) for companies in a peer group of comparably sized companies in related industries as well as a general industry group of comparably sized companies. The Compensation Committee uses the comparative data provided by CAP as a general indicator of relevant market conditions, but does not set specific benchmark targets for total director compensation or for individual elements of the director compensation program. No changes were made to the director compensation program for 2016.
Awards of stock options and RSUs are subject to forfeiture if a director leaves the Board prior to the scheduled vesting date for any reason, except that the vesting of such awards would accelerate in full upon a director ceasing to serve on the Board due to death or disability.
The number of RSUs awarded in 2016 was determined by dividing the grant date value of $160,000 by the average of the high and low sales priceholders of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the grant date ($9.22) and rounding down to the nearest whole number. As a result, 17,353 RSUs were awarded to each non‑employee director for 2016, provided the non-employee director satisfied the Board’s attendance requirement for 2015.
Only non-employee directors who have attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings held by the Board and committees on which they servedwill receive in the prior year are eligiblereincorporation merger only shares of Surviving Corporation common stock, which will be listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market, holders of our common stock will not be entitled to receive an annual award of RSUs, except that a new director with less than six months of serviceappraisal rights in the prior year is not subject to such thresholdreincorporation merger with respect to the first grant made after becoming a director. All non-employee directors servingtheir shares of our common stock.

19




THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE ADOPTION OF THE REINCORPORATION MERGER AGREEMENT

PROPOSAL 2
AUTHORITY TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING

If, at the timespecial meeting of grant (June 2016) satisfiedstockholders, our Board determines it is necessary or appropriate to adjourn the attendance requirements applicable forspecial meeting, we intend to move to adjourn the 2016 awards.
Haddrill Employment Agreement. On December 8, 2014, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Haddrill in connection with his role as Executive Vice Chairman of thespecial meeting.  For example, our Board which was modified by agreement of the Company and Mr. Haddrill on October 29, 2015. The term of Mr. Haddrill’s employment is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2017, subject to automatic one-year extensions at the end of the term and each succeeding annual anniversary thereafter unless timely notice of non-renewal is given.
Under Mr. Haddrill’s employment agreement, as modified, Mr. Haddrill is eligible to receive (i) an annual base salary of $1,500,000 and (ii)may make such a target annual incentive (the “Target Incentive”) for each year during the term in an amount determined by the Committee in accordance with the then applicable annual incentive plan, with the 2016 Target Incentive being set at

$700,000 with a maximum opportunity equal to 200% of the Target Incentive. In connection with entering into and subsequently modifying his employment agreement, Mr. Haddrill also received a one-time sign-on award of 30,284 time-vesting RSUs on December 8, 2014 (the "Sign-On Award"), a grant of 339,366 performance-conditioned RSUs on January 7, 2015 (the "Performance-contingent Awards"), and grants (the "Special Awards") consisting of (a) 63,810 time-vesting RSUs on October 29, 2015, and (b) 78,387 time-vesting RSUs on January 4, 2016 (the "2016 Time-Vesting RSUs"), which are described in more detail in the footnotes to the table below.
Upon expiration of the term of employment by the Company's failure to renew, Mr. Haddrill's Sign-On Award will fully vest and he will receive consulting fees equal to his annual base salary in exchange for certain consulting services for one year following such expiration, payable in bi-weekly installments during the consulting period. If Mr. Haddrill’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Haddrill for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement, as modified), he would then be entitled to receive: (i) an amount equal to his base salary plus a lump sum payment of $1,500,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices over a period of twelve (12) months, (ii) the Target Incentive, with the amount determined based on actual performance achievement through the most recently completed fiscal quarter at the time of such termination and target achievement thereafter weighted, respectively, according to the number of days in the calendar year elapsed prior to such termination and the number of days remaining in the calendar year, (iii) in the event that termination occurs with more than one full year remaining on the term of employment, an aggregate amount equal to the Target Incentive for each full year remaining in the term, (iv) continued vesting of his Sign-on Award in accordance with their original vesting schedule for a period of twelve (12) months following termination, (v) full vesting of the Special Awards, and (vi) payment of COBRA premiums for 12 monthsdetermination if Mr. Haddrill elects to continue medical coverage under the Company’s group health plan in accordance with COBRA. Mr. Haddrill would also be eligible for continued vesting of his Performance-contingent Awards post-termination, if his employment is terminated without cause; provided the number of shares distributed upon vesting will be pro-rated based on the percentage of the performance period that Mr. Haddrill was employed by the Company.
In the event of Mr. Haddrill’s death, his beneficiary or estate would be entitled to receive any benefits that may be payable under any life insurance benefit of Mr. Haddrill for which the Company pays premiums and full vesting of the Sign-On Award and the Special Awards. In the event Mr. Haddrill is terminated due to his “total disability” (as such term is defined in his employment agreement, as modified), he would be eligible to receive disability payments under the Company’s disability plans and full vesting of the Sign-On Award and the Special Awards. Mr. Haddrill’s agreement also contains covenants imposing on him certain obligations with respect to confidentiality and proprietary information, and restricting his ability to engage in certain activities in competition with the Company during his employment and for a period of 12 months after termination of his employment for any reason.

Director Compensation for 2016. The table below shows the compensation earned by our directors for 2016; except for Mr. Sheehan, whose compensation as an executive, and Mr. Isaacs, whose compensation as an executive and as Vice Chairman, during 2016, is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Name 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)
Stock Awards ($)(2)
Option Awards ($)
All
Other
Compensation
($)
(3)
Total
($)
Peter A. Cohen325,000159,995

484,995
Gerald J. Ford110,000159,995

269,995
Richard M. Haddrill  
2,013,100699,996
9,271
2,722,367
David L. Kennedy75,000159,995

234,995
Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald85,000159,995

244,995
Paul M. Meister85,000159,995

244,995
Ronald O. Perelman75,000159,995

234,995
Michael J. Regan120,000159,995

279,995
Barry F. Schwartz105,000159,995

264,995
Frances F. Townsend95,000159,995

254,995

(1)Reflects annual retainers earned by directors for 2016, other than in the case of Mr. Haddrill. For Mr. Haddrill, reflects his 2016 base salary and incentive payment earned in respect of 2016 under his modified employment agreement described above. In 2016, Mr. Cohen received $250,000 for his service as a Vice Chairman of the Board without any additional retainers for his service on the Executive and Finance Committee or as Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

(2)Reflects the grant date fair value of RSUs awarded during 2016, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value of the RSUs was determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to the award by the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the grant date. See Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016. For Mr. Haddrill, reflects the grant date fair value of the 2016 Time-Vesting RSUs received under his modified employment agreement described above.
(3)Reflects Company contributions to the Company's 401(k) plan for Mr. Haddrill.
The table below shows the number of stock options and unvested RSUs held by each of our directors as of December 31, 2016, other than Messrs. Sheehan and Isaacs, whose stock options and unvested RSUs are reflected in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table below.
Name 
Stock Options
(in shares)
(1)
RSUs(2)
Peter A. Cohen
33,521
Gerald J. Ford
33,521
Richard M. Haddrill
369,095
David L. Kennedy
64,031
Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald10,000
24,806
Paul M. Meister10,000
33,521
Ronald O. Perelman
33,521
Michael J. Regan
33,521
Barry F. Schwartz
33,521
Frances F. Townsend
33,521

(1)Reflects stock options granted to Judge McDonald and Mr. Meister on October 30, 2014 and March 20, 2012, respectively, upon the applicable directors’ joining the Board, each with a four-year vesting schedule and an exercise price of $9.65 and $11.10, respectively. The first and second installment of Judge McDonald’s stock options became exercisable on the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest and become exercisable in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. Mr. Meister’s stock options vested and became exercisable on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
(2)Reflects, for non-employee directors who were serving as such on the applicable grant date, as applicable, (a) one-fourth of an award of RSUs granted on June 4, 2013 (1,725 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest on June 4, 2017), (b) one-half of an award of RSUs granted on June 11, 2014 (6,990 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest in two equal installments on each of June 11, 2017 and 2018), (c) three-fourths of an award of RSUs granted on June 10, 2015 (7,453 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest in three equal annual installments on June 10, 2017, 2018 and 2019), and (d) 17,353 RSUs granted on June 15, 2016 (which are scheduled to vest in four equal annual installments beginning on June 15, 2017). For Mr. Haddrill, reflects (a) one-half of the Sign-on Award (15,192 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest in two equal installments on each of December 8, 2017 and 2018), (b) 282,805 of the Performance-contingent Awards, of which (i) 90,498 RSUs may vest in two equal installments in 2017 and 2018 contingent upon the achievement of certain strategic business goals and with the potential for up to 200% of the RSUs to vest in each installment but is shown as unvested at 100% in the table above, (ii) 22,624 RSUs may vest in two equal installments in March 2017 and March 2018 contingent upon the achievement of certain different performance goals, and (iii) 169,683 RSUs may vest in 2018 of which 50% is contingent on achievement of a certain performance goal and with the potential for up to 200% of the RSUs to vest and the remaining 50% of which is contingent on a different performance goal and with the potential for up to 115% of the RSUs to vest, all of which are shown at as unvested at 100% in the table above, (c) one-half of the Special Award granted on October 29, 2015 (31,905 RSUs which are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2017) and (d) one-half of the 2016 Time-Vesting RSUs (39,193 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2017). For Mr. D. Kennedy, includes one-fourth of an award of RSUs granted on December 5, 2013 during his tenure as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (37,500 RSUs, which are scheduled to vest on November 18, 2017).
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The stock ownership guidelines are intended to align the financial interests of our officers and directors with the interests of our stockholders. Under the guidelines, directors, except our Chief Executive Officer who is subject to the officer requirements, are required to own the lesser of (1) the number of shares of our common stock equalrepresented and voting in favor of the proposal to five timesadopt the director’s annual retainer divided byreincorporation merger agreement at the preceding 200-day average closing pricespecial meeting is insufficient to adopt that proposal under the DGCL, in order to enable our Board to solicit additional votes in respect of such proposal.  If our Board determines that it is necessary or appropriate, we will ask our stockholders to vote only upon the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, and not the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

In this proposal, we are asking you to authorize our Board to adjourn the special meeting to another place, date or time if our Board believes adjournment is necessary or appropriate.  If the stockholders approve the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, we could adjourn the special meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional votes, including the solicitation of votes from stockholders that have previously voted.  Among other things, approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting could mean that, even if we had received proxies representing a sufficient number of votes against the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement to defeat that proposal, we could adjourn the special meeting without a vote on the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement and seek to convince the holders of those shares or (2) 15,000 shares. Sharesto change their votes to votes in favor of the proposal to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.

If a quorum does not exist, the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock held directlypresent at the special meeting, in person or indirectly, including shares acquired uponby proxy, may adjourn the exercise of stock options, shares held within retirement and deferred compensation plans, time‑vesting RSUs and shares ownedspecial meeting to another place, date or time.  If a quorum exists, but there are not enough affirmative votes to adopt the reincorporation merger agreement, the special meeting may be adjourned by immediate family members will count for purposesthe affirmative vote of the policy, whereas outstanding (vested or unvested) stock options and performance‑conditioned RSUs will not count. Each covered director has five years to comply fromholders of a majority of votes cast at the later of the effective date of the policy and the date the director became subject to the policy. At present, all of our covered directors have the requisite level of stock ownership.special meeting.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in their ownership with the SEC. Based on a review of the copies of the reports that our directors, officers and ten percent holders filed with the SEC and on the representations made by such persons, we believe all applicable filing requirements were met during 2016.THE AUTHORITY TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth certain information as to the security ownership of each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each of our directors, our director nominee, each of our named executive officers, and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The number of shares and the percentages of beneficial ownership set forth below are calculated as of April 18,September 15, 2017 based on outstanding shares of 88,756,630.89,616,747. Except as otherwise indicated, the stockholders listed in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated.


Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerShares of Common Stock
 
Number(1)
 
Percent(1)
MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated
35 East 62nd Street
New York, New York 10065
34,575,736
(2)
38.58%
Sylebra HK Company Limited
Floor 20, 28 Hennessy Road
Wan Chai, Hong Kong
8,619,044
(3)
9.62%
Fine Capital Partners, L.P.
590 Madison Avenue, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10022
6,488,536
(4)
7.24%
Susquehanna Securities
401 E. City Avenue, Suite 220
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
6,383,005
(5)
7.12%

20

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerShares of Common Stock 
Number(1)
Percent(1)
MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated
35 East 62nd Street
New York, New York 10065
34,575,737(2)
38.96%
Sylebra HK Company Limited
Floor 20, 28 Hennessy Road
Wan Chai, Hong Kong
8,619,044(3)
9.71%
Fine Capital Partners, L.P.
590 Madison Avenue, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10022
6,488,536(4)
7.31%
Susquehanna Securities
401 E. City Avenue, Suite 220
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
6,383,005(5)
7.19%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055
5,799,787(6)
6.53%5,799,787
(6)
6.47%
Nantahala Capital Management, LLC
19 Old Kings Highway S, Suite 200
Darien, CT 06820
5,784,889(7)
6.52%5,784,889
(7)
6.46%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvem, PA 19355
4,637,396(8)
5.22%4,637,396
(8)
5.17%
Ronald O. Perelman
34,651,898(9)
39.04%34,651,897
(9)
38.67%
Kevin M. Sheehan76,634* 76,634 * 
M. Gavin Isaacs285,815* 42,779 * 
Richard M. Haddrill184,234* 161,633 * 
Peter A. Cohen288,551* 288,551 * 
Viet D. Dinh 0 * 
Gerald J. Ford371,415 * 
David L. Kennedy103,551* 103,551 * 
Gerald J. Ford367,077* 
Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald14,306* 14,673 * 
Paul M. Meister46,173* 46,173 * 
Michael J. Regan70,633* 70,633 * 
Barry F. Schwartz106,161* 102,761 * 
Frances F. Townsend49,279* 49,279 * 
David W. Smail41,570* 52,822 * 
James C. Kennedy260,722* 135,413 * 
Derik J. Mooberry63,334* 68,948 * 
Michael A. Quartieri38,171* 44,252 * 
Viet D. Dinh(10)
 * 
All current directors and executive officers as a group (consisting of 19 persons)(11)
36,860,26441.53%
All current directors and executive officers as a group (consisting of 19 persons)(10)
36,493,674 40.59%
    


* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
(1)
In accordance with SEC rules, this column includes shares that a person has a right to acquire within 60 days of April 18,September 15, 2017 through the exercise or conversion of stock options, RSUs or other securities. Such securities are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage of outstanding securities owned by such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by any other person. The securities reported for the directors and named executive officers listed in the table above include shares subject to the following awards as to which the equivalent number of underlying shares may be acquired through exercise or conversion within 60 days of April 18,September 15, 2017:
Mr. Perelman 12,042 RSUs; Mr. Haddrill 56,561 RSUs; Mr. Cohen 12,042 RSUs; Mr. D. Kennedy 8,547 RSUs, Mr. Ford 7,704 RSUs; Judge McDonald 6,822 RSUs and 5,000 stock options; Mr. Meister 12,042 RSUs and 10,000 stock options; Mr. Regan 12,042 RSUs; Mr. Schwartz 12,042 RSUs; Ms. Townsend 12,042 RSUs; Mr. Sheehan 66,858 stock options; Mr. Isaacs 47,790 RSUs and 195,246 stock options; Mr. Quartieri 25,614 stock options; Mr. J. Kennedy 5,480 RSUs and 102,681 stock options; Mr. Smail 33,881 stock options; and Mr. Mooberry 4,465 RSUs and 41,301 stock options.
Judge McDonald 12,500 stock options; Mr. Meister 10,000 stock options; Mr. Sheehan 66,858 stock options; Mr. Quartieri 6,081 RSUs and 25,614 stock options; Mr. Smail 42,148 stock options; and Mr. Mooberry 7,488 RSUs and 41,301 stock options.
(2)Includes shares held by MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, SGMS Acquisition Corporation, RLX Holdings Two LLC, SGMS Acquisition Two LLC and SGMS Acquisition Two Corporation.Three LLC. SGMS Acquisition Corporation, RLX Holdings Two LLC, SGMS Acquisition Two LLC and SGMS Acquisition Two CorporationThree LLC are holding companies owned by MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, whose Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and sole stockholder is Mr. Perelman. MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 34,575,73734,575,736 shares, SGMS Acquisition Corporation has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 26,385,73726,385,736 shares, RLX Holdings Two LLC has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 3,125,000 shares,  SGMS Acquisition Two LLC Corporation has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 3,495,000 shares and SGMS Acquisition Three LLC has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,570,000 shares. The shares so owned are, or may from time to time be, pledged to secure obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated or its affiliates.

Acquisition Two Corporation has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 5,065,000 shares. The shares so owned are, or may from time to time be, pledged to secure obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated or its affiliates. 
(3)Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2017 by Sylebra HK Company Limited, Sylebra Capital Management, Mr. Jeffrey Richard Fieler and Mr. Daniel Patrick Gibson, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The Schedule 13G states that each such person has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 8,619,044 shares.
(4)Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 by Fine Capital Partners, L.P., Fine Capital Advisors, LLC and Ms. Debra Fine, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The Schedule 13G states that each such person has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,488,536 shares.
(5)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017 by G1 Execution Services, LLC, Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC and Susquehanna Securities, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The Schedule 13G states that G1 Execution Services, LLC has sole voting and sole dispositive power over 544 shares, Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC has sole voting and sole dispositive power over 85,489 shares, and Susquehanna Securities has sole voting and sole dispositive power over 6,296,972 shares. The Schedule 13G states that G1 Execution Brokers, LLC and Susquehanna Securities are affiliated independent broker-dealers which, together with Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC, may be deemed to be a group. Therefore, the Schedule 13G indicates that the reporting persons have shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to all the 6,383,005 shares beneficially owned by all of the reporting persons.
21

(6)Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 27, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc., reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The Schedule 13G states that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 5,681,995 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,799,787 shares.
(7)Based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 by Nantahala Capital Management, LLC, Mr. Wilmot B. Harkey and Mr. Daniel Mack, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The amendment to Schedule 13G states that each such person has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 5,784,889 shares.
(8)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017 by The Vanguard Group, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2016. The Schedule 13G states that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 102,154 shares, shared voting power with respect to 4,800 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,532,742 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 104,654 shares.
(9)Includes the 34,575,73734,575,736 shares reported in footnote 2 above, which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Perelman, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and sole stockholder of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated. Mr. Perelman’s address is 35 East 62nd Street, New York, New York 10065.
(10)Director nominee.
(11)Includes 557,005269,845 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and 214,24913,569 shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs as to which the equivalent number of underlying shares may be acquired through exercise or conversion within 60 days of April 18,September 15, 2017.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and program, the compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee and the matters considered in making such decisions. The Company’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, referred to in this section as the “Committee.” The Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company, and for overseeing the Company’s executive compensation program.
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, reward and retain our executive officers. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our “named executive officers” for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, who were:

ExecutivePosition
Kevin M. Sheehan (1)
President and Chief Executive Officer
M. Gavin Isaacs (1)
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Michael A. Quartieri (2)
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
Scott D. Schweinfurth (2)
Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
James C. KennedyExecutive Vice President and Group Chief Executive of Lottery
David W. SmailExecutive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Derik J. MooberryExecutive Vice President and Group Chief Executive of Gaming

(1)In August 2016, Mr. Sheehan became President and Chief Executive Officer succeeding Mr. Isaacs, who became a Vice Chairman of the Board at the same time.
(2)In February 2016, Mr. Schweinfurth retired from the Company, and Mr. Quartieri became Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary on March 1, 2016.
As used in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tables and narratives that follow, (1) "SGICP" refers to our management incentive compensation program, and (2) "Target Compensation" refers to salary and target annual cash and equity incentive compensation opportunities under the SGICP.
Executive Summary
Our 2016 executive compensation program reflected key business priorities relating to operational and financial considerations, including the realization of ongoing cost savings, the creation of cash flow and continued innovation to provide best in class content and systems for our gaming, lottery and interactive product lines worldwide.
Financial performance in 2016 improved in all key areas relevant to management incentives: revenues grew $124.6 million compared to 2015, EBITDA for SGICP purposes (herein referred to as "SGICP EBITDA", a non-GAAP financial measure, with reconciliation provided to net loss in Appendix A) grew $79.7 million compared to 2015, and SGICP EBITDA minus capital expenditures ("CapEx") was $683.3 million due in part to reduced capital expenses. As a result of our improved performance in these areas, overall bonus levels across all business segments increased, and bonus levels in some business segments exceeded target levels.
Compensation Program Highlights for 2016
The following is a summary of the highlights of the Company’s executive compensation program:
Executive pay is substantially at risk because it largely consists of one or more types of performance‑based compensation that vary in value based on our stock price, or that can only be earned upon achievement of pre‑approved financial targets. The amount of target at‑risk pay as a percentage of Target Compensation of the named executive officers is shown below:
ExecutiveTarget At‑Risk Pay
(as a % of Target Compensation)
Mr. Sheehan78%
*
Mr. Isaacs79%**
Other Named Executive Officers67%
*For 2017.  Mr. Sheehan joined the Company in August 2016, and his 2016 compensation included a guaranteed bonus.
**Based on Mr. Isaacs' compensation for 2016 in his capacity as an executive officer of the Company.

Mr. Sheehan was hired as Chief Executive Officer on August 4, 2016. His compensation is set forth in an August 2016 employment agreement with competitive terms including: (i) $1.8 million base salary; (ii) 100% annual base salary cash bonus target under the SGICP (except for 2016, for which his employment agreement provided for a

$900,000 bonus); and (iii) annual participation in equity grants in an amount equal to 250% of base salary at the discretion of the Committee.
Upon commencement of his employment in August 2016, Mr. Sheehan also received an inducement equity award of 400,000 performance-conditioned RSUs designed both to incentivize and to reward him for taking meaningful actions to improve the Company's financial performance over a three-year performance period ending June 30, 2019. If the Company's EBITDA, calculated in a similar manner to SGICP EBITDA, grows by at least $150,000,000 during the performance period (comparing the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2019 to the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2016), 32.5% of the inducement award (or 130,000 shares) will vest. If the Company's EBITDA grows at least $300,000,000 during the same performance period, all 400,000 RSUs will vest.
Mr. Isaacs, who served as Chief Executive Officer until Mr. Sheehan's appointment, was also paid pursuant to an employment agreement with competitive terms consisting of: (i) $1.5 million base salary; (ii) 125% annual base salary cash bonus target under the SGICP; and (iii) ongoing participation in annual equity grants at the discretion of the Committee. On August 4, 2016, the Company modified its employment agreement with Mr. Isaacs to reflect the change of his role from President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company to Vice Chairman of the Board.
2016 SGICP annual cash bonuses to our named executive officers paid out between 73.3% and 99.7% of target. Certain adjustments were made to bonus payouts as set forth in the reconciliation appearing in Appendix A and then reduced based on the discretion of the Committee.

SGICP annual cash bonuses have varied with Company performance over the past five years as follows:

Actual SGICP Annual Cash Bonus as a % of Target Bonus Opportunity
Employees with Company-wide Responsibilities
20122013201420152016
84%58%12%36%73%

In order to appropriately motivate and retain management, the Committee approved 2016 annual equity awards at the full target opportunity for named executive officers. 2015 annual equity awards were also made at the full target opportunity. Providing competitive equity award opportunities in recent years was a priority after prior year reductions to annual equity award values in order to manage potential dilution and share usage under the Company’s 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the “2003 Plan”). While no reductions were applied to equity award opportunities in 2016 or 2015, a 10% reduction had been applied relative to the executives’ equity award opportunities in 2014, following an approximate reduction of 30% in 2013.
For Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri, J. Kennedy, Smail and Mooberry, 2016 annual equity awards introduced the use of performance-conditioned options that vest over time, but only if the 60-trading day average closing stock price of our common stock reflects an approximate 55% increase in the share price over the grant date no later than March 20, 2020. Those performance-conditioned options comprised 1/3 of the annual grant, and time-vesting stock options and time-vesting RSUs also each comprised 1/3 of the grant. Mr. Sheehan received a pro-rata annual equity award at the commencement of his employment in August 2016, with the same mix of performance-conditioned options, time-vesting stock options and time-vesting RSUs as the awards to other named executive officers.
No shares were issued under special performance-conditioned equity awards granted in 2012, which expired without vesting in 2016 as the adjusted EBITDA targets for those awards were not achieved in 2015.
Commitment to Good Governance and Best Practices
As part of its ongoing review of our executive compensation program, the Committee considers the results of our last “say on pay” proposal (approved by more than 69% of the votes cast at the 2014 Annual Meeting). In response to questions and concerns raised by certain stockholders or proxy advisory firms in recent years, the Committee has taken a number of actions that it believes should be viewed favorably by our stockholders. Those actions include the following:
No guaranteed salary increases. Our named executive officers are not entitled to contractual inflation‑based salary increases.

Challenging financial objectives for annual cash bonus and performance conditioned equity awards. Performance metrics support important business priorities.

Introduction of performance conditioned stock options in 2016. Vesting was contingent on a challenging stock price target of attaining a rolling 60-trading day average closing price of $15.00 per share (the "$15.00 Performance Goal") which was achieved. Achieving the target required an increase of 64% over the grant price for Mr. Sheehan and an increase of 55% for the other recipients.

Management of potential dilution and share usage under equity plans. When making equity awards,the Committee considers competitive market and peer group practices, the Company’s stock price performance and potential dilution and share usage under the 2003 Plan. While no reductions were applied to equity award opportunities in 2015 or 2016, the Committee has previously reduced the value of annual equity awards in order to manage levels of share utilization including reductions of 30% and 10% in 2013 and 2014, respectively. See “-Objectives and Components of Compensation Program-Long‑Term Incentive Compensation” below for additional information.
Stock ownership guidelines. The Company’s stock ownership guidelines apply to our directors, Chief Executive Officer, and executive officers who report directly to our Chief Executive Officer. The guidelines encourage a long‑term perspective in managing the Company and further align the interests of senior executives and directors with the interests of stockholders. See “-Corporate Governance Policies-Stock Ownership Guidelines” below for additional information.
Clawback policy. The Company’s “clawback” policy subjects cash and equity incentive compensation paid to senior executives (including the named executive officers) to recovery in the event that the Company’s financial statements are restated due to fraud or gross misconduct by the applicable executives. See “-Corporate Governance Policies-Clawback Policy” below for additional information.
No hedging policy. The Company prohibits employees and directors from engaging in hedging transactions. See “-Corporate Governance Policies-No Hedging Policy” below for additional information.
Independent compensation consulting firm. The Committee benefits from its utilization of an independent compensation consulting firm, CAP, which provides no other services to the Company.
Periodic risk assessment. The Committee has concluded that our executive compensation program does not encourage behaviors that would create risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
No excise tax gross‑ups. We do not agree to pay excise tax gross‑ups.
No above‑market returns. We do not offer preferential or above‑market returns on compensation deferred by our executive officers.
No loans to executive officers. We do not make personal loans to our executive officers.

Objectives and Components of Compensation Program
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract and retain executive talent, to encourage and reward excellent performance by executives whose contributions drive the success of the Company and create value for our stockholders. The program is structured to provide compensation packages that are competitive with the marketplace and to reward executives based on both Company and, in certain circumstances, individual performance, to encourage long‑term service and to align the interests of management and stockholders through incentives that encourage annual and long‑term results.
The principal components of the Company’s compensation program consist of base salaries, annual performance‑based incentive compensation and long‑term incentive compensation. The Company also has employment agreements with named executive officers that include severance and change of control arrangements. The following is a description of the Company’s compensation elements and the objectives they are designed to support:

Element of CompensationRationaleLinkage to Compensation Objective
Base Salary• Provides fixed level of compensation• Attracts and retains executive talent
Annual Incentive Compensation
(cash bonuses)
Target level of annual incentive compensation provides an attractive total cash opportunity that incentivizes achievement of the Company’s financial goals by tying payouts to Company financial performance, with actual annual incentive compensation payouts depending upon Company and, in certain circumstances, individual performance
• Fosters excellent business performance
• Aligns executive and stockholder interests by linking all or a portion of compensation to the annual performance of the Company

• Attracts and retains executive talent
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation
(stock options, performance-conditioned equity awards and time-vesting RSUs)
• Target level of long‑term incentive compensation provides a market‑competitive equity opportunity
• Conditioning certain equity awards upon achievement of multi-year financial performance targets and defined levels of share price appreciation aligns executive pay with stockholder interests
• Time-vesting RSUs promote executive retention
• Aligns executive and stockholder interests by linking a portion of compensation to long‑term Company performance
 • Fosters excellent business performance that creates value for stockholders
 • Attracts and retains executive talent
 • Encourages long‑term service
Employment Agreements with Severance Provisions and Employment Agreements
and Equity Incentive Plans with Change
of Control Provisions
• Severance provisions under employment agreements provide benefits to ease an employee's transition in the event of an unexpected employment termination by the Company due to changes in the Company's employment needs
• Change in control provisions under employment agreements and equity incentive plans encourage employees to remain focused on the best interests of the Company in the event of rumored or actual fundamental corporate changes
• Attracts and retains executive talent
• Encourages long‑term service

Base Salary
The base salaries of the Company’s executive officers are reviewed on an annual basis in light of the competitive marketplace, the executive officer’s responsibilities, experience and contributions and internal equity considerations. Internal equity in this context means ensuring that executives in comparable positions are rewarded comparably. Two of the named executive officers received salary increases for 2016, as shown below:
Executive 
Salary
Increase
Effective Date
New Salary
Rate
Mr. Quartieri$100,0003/1/16$600,000
Mr. J. Kennedy$50,0001/1/16$725,000
Mr. Quartieri’s salary increase related to his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, and is pursuant to the employment agreement he entered into with the Company dated as of December 15, 2015 but effective March 1, 2016 (the day following the retirement of Mr. Schweinfurth, former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary). Mr. Quartieri’s agreement has a term through December 31, 2018 (subject to automatic one-year extensions at the end of the term, and each succeeding anniversary thereafter unless timely notice of non-renewal is given).
Mr. J. Kennedy’s salary increase related to a three-year renewal of his employment contract, which now expires December 31, 2018.

Annual Incentive Compensation
Annual cash bonuses under the SGICP are based upon (1) the Company’s performance relative to the achievement of financial targets, (2) each business unit’s performance relative to the achievement of financial targets for executives directly involved with the operation of those units, as well as (3) for certain executives, an assessment of the executive’s performance and contribution, including factors not quantitatively measurable by financial results. If the applicable financial performance targets are met or exceeded, participants are eligible to receive SGICP cash bonuses based on a pre‑established target percentage of their base salaries, which target percentages for the named executive officers who participated in the SGICP in 2016 ranged from 75.0% to 125.0% of their base salaries.
The Company’s annual incentive compensation program is designed to align the executives’ bonus opportunities with the Company’s growth objectives, including the generation of free cash flow to pay down debt. The annual incentive compensation program for executive officers includes an initial funding feature intended to allow the awards to executive officers to meet the requirements for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). A pool equal to the aggregate of the maximum bonus amounts for our executive officers is funded if the Company financial performance meets or exceeds an Attributable EBITDA goal set by our Committee. The Committee does not expect to award the full amount authorized by this pool funding and the amounts awarded for 2016 are well below the fund. The Committee uses it discretion to reduce the executive officer bonuses based on the Company’s (1) revenue, (2) SGICP EBITDA and (3) SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx, measured relative to pre‑approved performance targets.
Although we disclose Attributable EBITDA in our quarterly earnings releases, we use a definition with certain adjustments to Attributable EBITDA for compensation measures, referred to herein as SGICP EBITDA for our SGICP targets. Attributable EBITDA (as defined in our earnings release filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 2, 2017) includes our net loss adjusted for: (1) interest; (2) income taxes; (3) depreciation and amortization expense and impairment charges (including goodwill impairment charges); (4) restructuring and other, which includes charges or expenses attributable to: (i) employee severance; (ii) management changes; (iii) restructuring and integration; (iv) M&A and other, which includes: (a) M&A transaction costs, (b) purchase accounting, (c) unusual items (including legal settlements), and (d) other non-cash items; and (v) cost savings initiatives; and (5) stock-based compensation plus our pro rata share of the EBITDA from equity investments. A number of the adjustments used in calculating Attributable EBITDA are not reflected in the calculation of SGICP EBITDA. The Committee also reserves the discretion to make certain adjustments to the bonus amounts on a case-by-case basis, considering various factors such as input from management, specific financial results and the corresponding business environment.
In 2016, the Committee determined to use the “SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx” measure instead of the Consolidated Net Cash Flow measure used in 2015. The calculation of this metric is presented in Appendix A and is similar to the “Attributable EBITDA less CapEx” measure that the Committee used in years prior to 2015 and has been determined by the Committee to be a useful measure of cash flow. Because our Consolidated Net Cash Flow is a relatively small value, small variations in actual results cause a disproportionate impact on bonus payouts. Consolidated Net Cash Flow also proved to be a difficult measure to apply at the business unit level.
When examining business results for 2016 SGICP payout calculation purposes, certain adjustments were made to SGICP EBITDA as set forth in the reconciliation appearing in Appendix A. The Committee then applied a 21% reduction (the "2016 reduction") to the resulting bonus payout.
The Committee reviews the design of the annual incentive compensation plan each year with a view to realizing desired corporate objectives and in light of management’s recommendation as to financial targets and payout structure. In recent years, this review has focused on structuring an annual cash bonus payout scale that the Committee deems appropriate in light of our growth objectives and our interest in managing incentive compensation costs. For 2016, the Committee approved an annual cash bonus payout structure under which achievement of targeted financial performance would result in the payout of 100% of a named executive officer’s target bonus opportunity. The payout structure was approved based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and in order to competitively reward executives for the achievement of targeted goals.
Targeted goals for 2016 represented year‑over‑year growth of 3.9% for revenue and 14.3% for SGICP EBITDA. The revenue growth rate is reflective of the challenging market conditions for our products globally, whereas the growth in SGICP EBITDA is reflective of profit growth in the global Interactive and Lottery business units and cost reductions throughout the Company.
No portion of the 2016 SGICP cash bonus attributable to a particular financial metric was payable unless at least 80% of the targeted amount was achieved, and the payout percentage at this minimum threshold level was 50% of an executive’s target bonus opportunity. Bonuses in excess of an executive’s target bonus opportunity were payable only if the financial results exceeded 100% of the targeted amount for the applicable financial metric. Had the Company achieved 120% or greater of the

targeted amount for each financial metric, the calculated annual cash bonus for each of the named executive officers with Company‑wide responsibilities would have been multiplied by 200%. The multiplier would have been applied ratably for achievement between performance levels.
The revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx targets set at the beginning of 2016 for consolidated financial performance are shown below.
  Annual Cash Bonus Payout as Percentage of Target Award
  50%100%150%200%
RevenueTarget ($ millions)
$2,294

$2,867

$3,154

$3,440
 % of Target80%100%110%120%
SGICP EBITDATarget ($ millions)
$802

$1,002

$1,102

$1,202
 % of Target80%100%110%120%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapExTarget ($ millions)
$564

$705

$776

$846
 % of Target80%100%110%120%
The 2016 annual cash bonus amounts for the eligible named executive officers with Company‑wide responsibilities, except for Mr. Sheehan who received a contractual bonus for 2016 and Mr. Schweinfurth who retired in February 2016, were determined based on attainment of the consolidated financial performance targets for the three metrics weighted as follows: 1/3 revenue, 1/3 SGICP EBITDA and 1/3 SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx. The annual cash bonus amounts for the named executive officers directly managing the operation of a business unit were determined based on the same metrics with the same relative weightings, except the outcomes were determined based on a combination of 20% consolidated results and 80% business unit results. The weightings of metrics were calculated as follows for our executive officers with Company-wide responsibilities who participated in the SGICP, which included Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri and Smail:
Performance Measure Level Weighting Metric Weighting Overall Weighting
Consolidated     
Revenue100%×33.3%=33.3%
SGICP EBITDA100%×33.3%=33.3%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx100%×33.3%=33.3%
The weightings of metrics were calculated as follows for our executive officers who directly managed the operation of a business unit, including Mr. J. Kennedy, the head of the global Lottery business unit, and Mr. Mooberry, the head of the global Gaming business unit:
Performance MeasureLevel Weighting Metric Weighting Overall Weighting
Consolidated     
Revenue20%×33.3%=6.7%
SGICP EBITDA20%×33.3%=6.7%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx20%×33.3%=6.7%
      
Business Unit(1)
     
Revenue80%×33.3%=26.6%
SGICP EBITDA80%×33.3%=26.6%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx80%×33.3%=26.6%

(1)For Mr. J. Kennedy, the global Lottery business unit and, for Mr. Mooberry, the global Gaming business unit.

For 2016, Mr. Sheehan's bonus was $900,000 pursuant to his employment agreement, and Mr. Schweinfurth, who retired effective February 29, 2016, was not eligible for a bonus. Based on the 2016 annual cash bonus payout structure, the other named executive officers had the following bonus opportunities:
Executive Threshold Annual Bonus
Opportunity
(% of Base Salary)
Target Annual Bonus
Opportunity
(% of Base Salary)
Maximum Annual Bonus
Opportunity
(% of Base Salary)
Mr. Isaacs62.5%125.0%250.0%
Mr. Quartieri37.5%75.0%150.0%
Mr. J. Kennedy37.5%75.0%150.0%
Mr. Smail37.5%75.0%150.0%
Mr. Mooberry37.5%75.0%150.0%

Company-Wide Annual Cash Bonus Results
For Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri and Smail, each of whom had Company-wide responsibilities in 2016, the actual consolidated revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx results for annual cash bonuses under the SGICP in 2016 represented achievement of 100.6%, 95.4% and 96.9%, respectively, of our targeted 2016 financial goals. Consolidated SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx were adjusted by the Committee, as shown in Appendix A, resulting in a reduced bonus payout amount. The Committee then reduced the calculated bonus payout amount by the 2016 reduction. As shown in the table below, the resulting overall 2016 annual cash bonuses paid to Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri and Smail, represented 73.3% of their target annual cash bonus opportunities.
   
2016
($ millions)
  
   80% Target100% Target ResultsWeighted Actual Payout
   AchievementAchievement (% of(% of
   (50%(100%SGICPTargetTarget Bonus
 Weighting payout)payout)ResultsAchievement)
Opportunity)(1)
Consolidated       
Revenue33.3% $2,293.5
$2,866.9
$2,883.4
100.6%27.2%
SGICP EBITDA33.3% 801.5
1,001.9
956.2(2)

95.4%22.4%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx33.3% 564.0
705.0
683.3(2)

96.9%23.7%
     Weighted Total: 73.3%

(1)Reflects the 2016 reduction that was applied to all SGICP bonus payouts.
(2)Refer to Appendix A for reconciliation of 2016 SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx for SGICP purposes, which are non-GAAP financial measures.
Global Lottery Annual Cash Bonus Results
For Mr. J. Kennedy, who was the head of the global Lottery business unit in 2016, the actual global Lottery revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx results for annual cash bonuses under the SGICP in 2016 represented 95.5%, 105.1% and 113.2%, respectively, of targeted 2016 financial goals. Global Lottery SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx were adjusted by the Committee, as shown in Appendix A. Each metric exceeded 80% of target, and therefore Mr. J. Kennedy's bonus calculation included an amount attributable to such performance. The portion of Mr. J. Kennedy’s annual cash bonus based on consolidated revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx was calculated as described in the above section relating to executive officers with Company-wide responsibilities. The Committee then reduced the resulting bonus payout amount by the 2016 reduction. As shown in the table below, the resulting overall 2016 annual cash bonus paid to Mr. J. Kennedy, represented 99.7% of his target annual cash bonus opportunity.

   
2016
($ millions)
  
   80% Target100% Target ResultsWeighted Actual Payout
   AchievementAchievement (% of(% of
   (50%(100%SGICPTargetTarget Bonus
 Weighting payout)payout)ResultsAchievement)
Opportunity)(1)
Consolidated       
Revenue6.7% $2,293.5
$2,866.9
$2,883.4
100.6%5.5%
SGICP EBITDA6.7% 801.5
1,001.9
956.2(2)

95.4%4.5%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx6.7% 564.0
705.0
683.3(2)

96.9%4.8%
        
Global Lottery       
Revenue26.6% $644.9
$806.1
$777.9
95.5%18.6%
SGICP EBITDA26.6% 204.6
255.8
268.8(2)

105.1%27.7%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx26.6% 161.3
201.6
228.3(2)

113.2%38.5%
     Weighted Total: 99.7%

(1)Reflects the 2016 reduction that was applied to all SGICP bonus payouts.
(2)Refer to Appendix A for reconciliation of 2016 SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx for SGICP purposes, which are non-GAAP financial measures.
Global Gaming Annual Cash Bonus Results
For Mr. Mooberry, who was the head of the global Gaming business unit in 2016, the actual global Gaming revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx results for annual cash bonuses under the SGICP in 2016 represented 100.0%, 98.4% and 99.9%, respectively, of targeted 2016 financial goals. Global Gaming SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx were adjusted by the Committee, as shown in Appendix A. Each metric exceeded 80% of target, and therefore Mr. Mooberry's annual cash bonus calculation included an amount attributable to such performance. The portion of Mr. Mooberry’s bonus based on consolidated revenue, SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx was calculated as described in the above section relating to executive officers with Company-wide responsibilities. The Committee then reduced the calculated bonus payout amount by the 2016 reduction. As shown in the table below, the resulting overall 2016 annual cash bonus paid to Mr. Mooberry, represented 76.5% of his target annual cash bonus opportunity.


   
2016
($ millions)
  
   80% Target100% Target ResultsWeighted Actual Payout
   AchievementAchievement (% of(% of
   (50%(100%SGICPTargetTarget Bonus
 Weighting payout)payout)ResultsAchievement)
Opportunity)(1)
Consolidated       
Revenue6.7% $2,293.5
$2,866.9
$2,883.4
100.6%5.5%
SGICP EBITDA6.7% 801.5
1,001.9
956.2(2)

95.4%4.5%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx6.7% 564.0
705.0
683.3(2)

96.9%4.8%
        
Global Gaming       
Revenue26.6% $1,417.5
$1,771.9
$1,772.7
100.0%21.0%
SGICP EBITDA26.6% 646.8
808.5
795.3(2)

98.4%19.8%
SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx26.6% 500.2
625.2
624.5(2)

99.9%20.9%
     Weighted Total: 76.5%
(1)Reflects the 2016 reduction that was applied to all SGICP bonus payouts.
(2)Refer to Appendix A for reconciliation of 2016 SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx for SGICP purposes, which are non-GAAP financial measures.
Summary
Mr. Sheehan joined the Company in August 2016, and his bonus for 2016 was contractually set at $900,000. Mr. Schweinfurth, who retired effective February 29, 2016, was not eligible for a bonus during 2016. Our other named executive officers received bonuses based on the consolidated and relevant business unit financial performance described above, as adjusted downwards by the Committee. Specifically, the Committee approved annual cash bonuses for 2016 for the eligible named executive officers as shown below:
Executive Actual Annual Bonus AwardAward as a
% of Target Annual Bonus Opportunity
Award as a
% of Base Salary
Mr. Isaacs
$1,374,375
73.3%91.6%
Mr. Quartieri
$305,417
73.3%52.6%
Mr. J. Kennedy
$542,119
99.7%74.8%
Mr. Smail
$329,850
73.3%55.0%
Mr. Mooberry
$315,563
76.5%57.4%

Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Annual Equity Awards
Except for Mr. Schweinfurth, who retired effective February 29, 2016, the Company’s executive officers received annual long‑term incentive compensation awards, comprised of time-vesting stock options, performance-conditioned stock options and time-vesting RSUs, which link their compensation to the long‑term performance of the Company, align their interests with stockholders and encourage long‑term service. Under the current equity award opportunity guidelines, eligible executives have a target annual equity award opportunity equal to a designated percentage of their base salary (with the actual award determined on or prior to the grant date, in the discretion of the Committee). Long-term incentive opportunities are the largest component of variable compensation for the executives, which appropriately ties a significant proportion of their compensation to the long-term performance of the business. The target annual equity award opportunities for 2016 are shown below:

ExecutiveTarget Equity Award
Opportunity for 2016
(% of Salary)
Mr. Sheehan(1)
250%
Mr. Isaacs(2)
250%
Mr. Quartieri(3)
125%
Mr. J. Kennedy(4)
125%
Mr. Smail125%
Mr. Mooberry125%

(1)Mr. Sheehan received an equity grant expressed as a percentage of his base salary, prorated for the portion of 2016 in which he was employed by the Company. Mr. Sheehan also received 400,000 performance-conditioned RSUs as an inducement award at the commencement of his employment in August 2016.
(2)Mr. Isaacs’ equity award opportunity is expressed as a portion of his annual rate of base salary at the time of grant, which was $1,500,000, even though he only served as an officer of the Company through August 2016. In its discretion, the Committee reduced Mr. Isaacs' actual 2016 equity award to 200% of his base salary.
(3)Mr. Quartieri’s equity award opportunity is expressed as a percentage of his annual rate of base salary he received during 2016 after his promotion effective March 1, 2016 to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.
(4)Mr. J. Kennedy also received 70,000 RSUs in connection with the amendment to his employment agreement with the Company to extend the term of his employment through December 31, 2018.

In 2016, the Committee awarded Messrs. Sheehan, Isaacs, Quartieri, J. Kennedy, Smail and Mooberry one-third of the value of their annual equity awards in the form of time-vesting stock options, one-third in the form of performance-conditioned stock options and one-third in the form of time-vesting RSUs. The vesting of the performance-conditioned stock options was conditioned on the Company's common stock attaining the $15.00 Performance Goal on or before March 20, 2020. The $15.00 Performance Goal represented a 64% increase over the exercise price for Mr. Sheehan, whose grant date was August 10, 2016, and a 55% increase over the exercise price for the other five individuals named above, whose grant dates were June 21, 2016. In each case, the grant date fair value or, in the case of the stock options, exercise price, was determined as the average of the high and low selling prices of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date. Upon satisfaction of the performance condition, the performance-conditioned stock options convert to time-vesting options that vest 25% per year beginning on March 20, 2017 and continuing on the next three anniversary dates of March 20, 2017. The Committee determined that a stock price measure was more directly aligned with stockholder interests than the three-year cumulative EBITDA target that was used as a portion of the long-term awards granted to certain named executive officers in 2015. The adoption of a stock price measure also reflects the uncertainty of predicting a reliable three-year cumulative EBITDA target when the Company was continuing to undergo significant cost reductions post integration of major acquisitions in 2013 and 2014. The $15.00 Performance Goal was achieved on February 2, 2017. The time-vesting stock options and time-vesting RSUs are scheduled to vest over a period of four years starting March 20, 2017.
In the interest of preserving available shares under the 2003 Plan, the Committee in several recent years reduced annual equity awards below an executive’s target equity award opportunity. Award values were reduced by 10% in 2014, following a reduction of 30% in 2013. For 2015 and 2016, with the increase in the Company's stock price, the Committee did not apply any reduction to target equity award opportunities and awarded full equity award opportunities to the named executive officers.
Information regarding the 2016 annual equity awards is set forth below:

Executive Date of Grants
Time-Vesting Options(1)
Vesting Schedule of Time-Vesting
Options(2)
Performance-Conditioned Options
Vesting Schedule of Performance-Conditioned
Options(3)
Time- Vesting RSUs
Vesting
Schedule of Time-Vesting RSUs
(2)
Mr. Sheehan08/10/2016133,7174 years133,7174 years67,3704 years
Mr. Isaacs06/21/2016204,9184 years204,9184 years103,6264 years
Mr. Quartieri06/21/201651,2294 years51,2294 years25,9064 years
Mr. J. Kennedy06/21/201661,9024 years61,9024 years31,3034 years
Mr. Smail06/21/201651,2294 years51,2294 years25,9064 years
Mr. Mooberry06/21/201646,9604 years46,9604 years23,7474 years

(1)Stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low prices of the common stock on the trading day prior to the grant date, specifically $9.15 for Mr. Sheehan and $9.65 for the other named executive officers.
(2)Awards vest in four equal annual installments commencing March 20, 2017 and the first three anniversaries of that date.
(3)Awards vest in four equal annual installments commencing March 20, 2017 and the first three anniversaries of that date, as a result of the $15.00 Performance Goal being achieved on February 2, 2017.
Other 2016 Equity Awards
In 2016, we made special grants of equity awards to Messrs. Sheehan and J. Kennedy in connection with Mr. Sheehan's commencement of employment and Mr. J. Kennedy's extension of his term of employment. The award to Mr. Sheehan consisted of 400,000 performance-conditioned RSUs granted on August 10, 2016, which will cliff-vest in March 2020 contingent on the achievement of defined levels of EBITDA improvement over a three-year period as described above under “Executive Summary-Compensation Program Highlights for 2016”. The award to Mr. J. Kennedy consisted of 70,000 RSUs granted on January 14, 2016 that will vest in four equal installments commencing January 14, 2017 and the first three anniversaries of that date.
Previously Granted Annual Performance-Conditioned Awards
Certain of the named executive officers (Messrs. Isaacs, Schweinfurth, J. Kennedy, Smail and Mooberry) received an award of performance-conditioned RSUs in 2015 that will vest based on cumulative SGICP EBITDA achievement over the three-year period from 2015-2017. The cumulative SGICP EBITDA target was based on consensus analyst estimates for the Company’s EBITDA performance as well as anticipated year-over-year growth through 2017. Payouts to named executive officers who terminate employment (other than for cause), such as Messrs. Isaacs and Schweinfurth, will be pro-rated based on the number of days worked during the 3-year performance period. The payout schedule for these RSUs is as follows:
  
% of Performance-Conditioned RSUs Vesting(1)
  0%70%100% (Target)120%150%
Three-Year Cumulative EBITDA (2015-2017)Target ($ million)<$2,600
$2,600

$3,300

$3,600
≥$4,000
 % of Target<80%80%100%110%≥120%

(1)The percentage of RSUs vesting is interpolated between performance levels, increasing or decreasing in proportion to the performance achievement between levels.
Special Performance-Conditioned Equity Awards
In February 2012, the Company granted approximately 494,000 RSUs to certain senior executives (including 65,000 RSUs to Mr. J. Kennedy), which awards were scheduled to vest at the rate of 25% per year, but only if the Company’s “adjusted EBITDA” for a particular year equaled or exceeded certain adjusted EBITDA targets. "Adjusted EBITDA" for purposes of the special performance-conditioned RSUs was not the same as SGCIP EBITDA or the Attributable EBITDA metric reported in the Company's earnings releases.  Instead "adjusted EBITDA" was calculated with certain adjustments relating to the aggregate consideration paid by the Company in connection with acquisitions in any year, the annual interest cost for such year on the proceeds of any debt used to finance any such acquisition, a "deemed" annual interest cost on any equity used as consideration to make such acquisition; and an amount equal to the capital expenditures of the relevant business during the four quarters prior

to the acquisition, and other adjustments. None of the adjusted EBITDA targets were achieved, and in March 2016, all outstanding RSUs under these awards expired without vesting.
Retirement Plans
Executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) retirement plan under the same rules that apply to other employees. The Company made a matching contribution of 100% of the first 1% of contributions and 50% of the next 5% of contributions (for a match of up to 3.5% of eligible compensation).

We also have a non‑qualified deferred compensation plan that enables executive officers and other eligible employees to defer receipt of up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual cash bonus under the SGICP during their employment or for certain specified minimum deferral periods. The Company does not make any matching or profit sharing contributions under this plan. Although we have established a rabbi trust to assist us in meeting our obligations under the plan, account balances under the plan are unsecured and remain part of the Company’s general assets until distributed to the participants. The value of a participant’s account balance is based solely on the participant’s deferrals and the investment return on such deferrals given the performance of the investment options that they select. We do not guarantee any minimum return on those investments.

Corporate Governance Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Committee approved stock ownership guidelines requiring our directors, Chief Executive Officer and executive officers who report to our Chief Executive Officer (including the named executive officers) to acquire and maintain a meaningful ownership interest in the Company. These guidelines are intended to encourage a long‑term perspective in managing the Company and to further align the interests of our executive officers and directors with the interests of our stockholders. Covered individuals are required to own the lesser of (1) a number of shares of our common stock equal to a specified multiple of annual base salary (or in the case of directors, other than our Chief Executive Officer, annual cash retainer for Board service) divided by the preceding 200-day average closing price of such shares or (2) a set number of shares. The stock ownership requirement varies based on position, as shown in the table below. Shares of our common stock held directly or indirectly, including shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options, shares held within retirement and deferred compensation plans, time‑vesting RSUs and shares owned by immediate family members will count for purposes of the policy, whereas outstanding (vested or unvested) stock options and performance‑conditioned RSUs will not count. Covered individuals will have five years to comply from the date the individual became subject to the policy or to an increased level under the policy. We expect covered individuals who do not meet the ownership requirements to retain at least 50% of the shares of our common stock that vest or are acquired upon exercise of stock options, net of applicable taxes, until the ownership requirements are met.
Job LevelMinimum Required Ownership Interest
Chief Executive OfficerLesser of five times annual base salary or 475,000 shares
Group Chief Executives and Chief Financial OfficerLesser of two times annual base salary or 70,000 shares
Other Executive Officers Reporting to the Chief Executive OfficerLesser of annual base salary or 25,000 shares

The following table summarizes the ownership of our named executive officers against these guidelines as of December 31, 2016 (excluding former employees, Mr. Schweinfurth, who is no longer subject to such guidelines, and Mr. Isaacs, who is subject to the guidelines for directors). All of our named executive officers are in compliance with our guidelines.
Name 
Ownership Requirement
(# of Shares/ Units)
Current Ownership
(# of Shares/ Units)
Mr. Sheehan(1)
475,00067,370
Mr. Quartieri(2)
70,00050,230
Mr. J. Kennedy70,000264,848
Mr. Smail25,00041,222
Mr. Mooberry(3)   
70,00066,242
(1)Mr. Sheehan became subject to the guidelines upon his hire in August 2016 and will have until August 2021 to satisfy the requirements.
(2)Mr. Quartieri became subject to the guidelines upon his promotion in March 2016 and will have until March 2021 to satisfy the requirements.
(3)Mr. Mooberry became subject to the guidelines upon his promotion in January 2015 and will have until January 2020 to satisfy the requirements.

Clawback Policy
The Committee and the Board approved a cash and equity compensation “clawback” policy. Under the policy, the Committee may, in its discretion, take any one or more of the following actions in the event of a restatement of our financial statements that the Committee determines was due to an executive’s fraud or gross misconduct:
cancel the executive’s outstanding incentive compensation awards (defined as annual cash bonus and equity compensation, whether or not vested);
disqualify the executive from receiving future incentive compensation awards;
recoup incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive from and after the date that is one year before the events giving rise to the restatement were discovered; and/or
recoup the executive’s gains from the sale of shares awarded as incentive compensation or the exercise of stock options from and after the date that is one year before the events giving rise to the restatement were discovered.
The Committee and the Board intend to review and consider updates to this policy from time to time. In addition, to the extent that the SEC adopts final rules for clawback policies that require changes to our policy, we will revise our policy accordingly.
No Hedging Policy
The Committee also approved a policy prohibiting employees and directors from hedging or engaging in similar transactions designed to protect against declines in the market price of our common stock. In particular, employees and directors may not:
purchase or sell options (e.g., puts, calls and collars) relating to our securities;
purchase or sell other derivative securities designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our securities; or
engage in short sales of Company stock.
Peer Group
As a general matter, the Committee uses compensation data derived from a peer group of companies as a general indicator of relevant market conditions for both executives’ and non-employee directors' compensation, but does not set specific

benchmark targets for total executive or non-employee director compensation or for individual elements of executive or non-employee director compensation.
In light of the Bally acquisition, the Committee, in consultation with CAP, approved a peer group of 18 companies in December 2015. The peer group was comprised of Activision Blizzard, Inc., Alliance Data Systems Corporation, Boyd Gaming Corporation, Cadence Design Systems Inc., Cardtronics Inc., Crane Co., Daktronics Inc., Diebold, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Everi Holdings Inc., Global Payments Inc., IAC/InterActiveCorp, International Game Technology PLC, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., Lexmark International Inc., Penn National Gaming Inc., Pinnacle Entertainment Inc., and Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. This was the same group that was used for 2016, with the exception of Lexmark International, which was acquired by Apex Technology and subsequently removed from the peer group. As measured following the 4th quarter of 2016, the Company’s trailing 12-month revenue was at the 53rd percentile of the peer group, while our market capitalization was at the 26th percentile.

Role of Management
The Committee works directly with our Chief Human Resources Officer on our executive compensation program and receives recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of executive officers, other than with respect to the Chief Executive Officer’s own compensation. The Committee has the authority to follow these recommendations or make different determinations in its sole discretion.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Committee has the sole authority to select and retain outside compensation consultants or any other consultants, legal counsel or other experts to provide independent advice and assistance in connection with the execution of its responsibilities. The Committee has engaged CAP to provide such independent advice, including:
attending scheduled meetings of the Committee and providing advice and context on matters discussed in the meetings;
periodically reviewing and recommending updates to our compensation peer group;
conducting competitive compensation reviews with respect to senior executives and non‑employee directors;
advising on long‑term incentive programs generally, as well as on alternatives to historical equity grants;
advising the Committee on legal and regulatory developments;
advising on certain policies, including policies relating to stock ownership guidelines, compensation clawbacks and hedging prohibitions;
advising on the design of annual incentives under the SGICP; and
assisting in the review of the Company’s compensation policies and practices, with a focus on incentive programs, from a risk management perspective.
CAP generally attends meetings of the Committee, is available to participate in executive sessions and communicates directly with the Committee’s chairman or its other members outside of meetings. CAP was retained by and reports directly to the Committee, which determines the scope of requested services and approves fee arrangements for its work, and does not provide any other services to, or receive any other fees from, the Company without the prior approval of the Committee Chairman.
In 2016, the Committee reviewed the independence of CAP in light of the criteria set forth in the final rules relating to compensation consultant independence that were issued by the SEC in June 2012. Based on this review, the Committee is satisfied that no conflicts of interest exist that interfere with the independence of CAP, and CAP is fully able to provide to the Committee independent advice regarding executive and director compensation.

Compensation Program as it Relates to Risk
The Company’s management and the Committee, with the assistance of CAP, periodically review the Company’s compensation policies and practices, focusing particular attention on incentive programs, so as to ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking by the Company’s employees. Specifically, this review includes the SGICP (in which executives generally participate), the Company’s business unit bonus and commission plans (in which other employees participate) and the Company’s long-term incentive plan. As discussed above, the SGICP is generally designed to reward achievement of annual results when measured against performance metrics, whereas the annual equity incentive plan is designed to link a portion of compensation to long‑term Company performance. Management and the Committee do not believe that the Company’s compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company for the following reasons:

our incentive programs appropriately balance short‑ and long‑term incentives, with a significant percentage of total compensation for the senior executive team provided in the form of incentive compensation focused on the Company’s long‑term performance;

the SGICP uses multiple financial performance metrics that encourage executives and other employees to focus on the overall health of the business rather than on a single financial measure;
a qualitative assessment of individual performance is generally a component of individual compensation payments;
annual cash bonuses under the SGICP and business unit plans are capped;
the Committee approved stock ownership guidelines applicable to senior executives and directors, a clawback policy with respect to cash and equity incentive compensation, and a prohibition on hedging our stock;
executive officers and certain other key employees with access to material nonpublic information must obtain permission from the Company’s Chief Legal Officer to trade in shares of our common stock, even during an open trading period;
Board and management processes are in place to oversee risk associated with the SGICP and business unit plans, including periodic business performance reviews by management and regular bonus accrual updates to the Committee; and
the Company’s risk management processes - including the Company’s enterprise risk management program, Code (and related training), strong ethics and compliance function that includes suitability reviews of customers and other persons and entities with which the Company does business, internal approval processes and legal department review of contracts - mitigate the potential for undue risk‑taking.
Employment Agreements; Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers. The agreements specify duties and minimum compensation commitments. The agreements also provide for severance benefits in certain circumstances and impose restrictive covenants that relate to, among other things, confidentiality and competition. The Committee believes that employment agreements with our executive officers are desirable as a means to attract executive talent, to encourage long‑term service, to obtain a measure of assurance as to the executive’s continued employment in light of prevailing market competition, to impose the restrictive covenants described below and, where practicable, to provide severance and other terms and conditions comparable to those provided to similarly situated executives.

The severance protection provided under employment agreements assists the Company in attracting and retaining executives and is designed to ease an executive’s transition in the event of an unexpected termination by the Company due to changes in the Company’s employment needs. Severance provisions that are included in the agreements do not generally enhance an employee’s current income, and therefore are generally independent of the direct compensation decisions made by the Committee from year to year.
The employment agreements with our named executive officers provide for enhanced severance payments if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated in connection with a change in control (as defined in the employment agreements). The Committee views these enhanced severance provisions as appropriate because they encourage executives to remain focused on the Company’s business in the event of rumored or actual fundamental corporate changes, allow executives to assess potential change in control transactions objectively without regard to the potential impact on their own job security and are not triggered

in connection with a change in control unless an executive’s employment is terminated without “cause” or the executive terminates for “good reason” within certain timeframes.
The Company has change in control provisions in the 2003 Plan such that unvested stock options, RSUs and other equity awards would generally accelerate upon a change in control (as defined in the plans). These provisions apply to all plan participants. The Committee believes that these provisions are appropriate given that an employee’s position could be adversely affected by a change in control even if he or she is not terminated.
We entered into an employment agreement in 2016 with Mr. Sheehan in connection with his commencement of employment as Chief Executive Officer. At the same time, we entered into a Modification Agreement with Mr. Isaacs amending his employment agreement in connection with his ceasing to be President and Chief Executive Officer and becoming Vice Chairman of the Board. Following the expiration of Mr. Isaacs' modified employment agreement on December 31, 2016, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with Mr. Isaacs securing his services in a consulting capacity through June 30, 2018. During 2016, we also entered into an amendment of Mr. J. Kennedy's employment agreement that extended the term through December 31, 2018. For additional information regarding these agreements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
In implementing the Company’s compensation program, the Committee’s general policy is to consider any significant effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits a public company’s tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to the chief executive officer and certain of the other highest paid executive officers. The Committee has taken steps so that annual cash bonuses under the SGICP as well as stock options and performance-conditioned RSUs granted to senior executive officers may be eligible to qualify as “performance‑based” compensation, which is excluded from the $1.0 million deductibility cap imposed under Section 162(m). Some forms of compensation, however, such as salary, guaranteed minimum bonuses and RSUs awarded without performance‑based vesting conditions do not qualify for tax deductibility in aggregate amounts in excess of $1.0 million per year. While the Committee generally seeks to take advantage of favorable tax treatment in implementing the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee has authorized and may in the future authorize compensation that does not qualify for tax deductibility in circumstances in which the Committee believes it is necessary or appropriate to give priority to other objectives of the Company.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Compensation Committee
Peter A. Cohen, Chairman
Paul M. Meister
Barry F. Schwartz
OTHER MATTERS

Summary Compensation Table
The table below shows the compensation of our current President and Chief Executive Officer, former President and Chief Executive Officer, our current and former Chief Financial Officers, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2016. These seven individuals are the named executive officers for 2016.
Name and Principal Position Year
Salary
($)
(1)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)
(3)
Option
Awards
($)
(4)
Non‑Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(5)
All Other
Compensation
($)
(6)
Total
($)
Kevin M. Sheehan2016671,538900,0004,276,4361,244,558
694,6227,787,154
President and        
Chief Executive Officer        
M. Gavin Isaacs (7)
20161,500,000
999,991
1,948,3461,374,37525,4675,848,179
Former President and20151,500,000
2,699,997
1,350,120
665,625
9,2756,225,017
Chief Executive Officer2014853,846641,488
750,213
755,020
108,512
5,1923,114,271
Michael A. Quartieri2016580,769
249,993
487,080
305,417
10,2291,633,488
Executive Vice President,        
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary        
Scott D. Schweinfurth(8)   
2016148,585



955,7481,104,332
Former Executive Vice President,2015675,000
562,493
281,274
179,719
7,3391,705,825
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary2014658,766363,997
749,511
94,626
61,003
11,7001,939,603
James C. Kennedy2016724,231
772,474588,560542,11926,8552,654,239
Executive Vice President, Group2015675,000
562,493
281,274
203,006
9,2751,731,048
Chief Executive of Lottery2014675,000
569,530
190,564
327,343
5,8501,768,286
David W. Smail2016600,000
249,993
487,080
329,850
10,3981,677,321
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal        
Officer        
Derik J. Mooberry2016550,000
229,159446,492315,56322,5731,563,788
Executive Vice President, Group2015552,115
458,313
229,184
163,763
7,9871,411,362
Chief Executive of Gaming        

(1)The amounts in the “salary” column reflect base salary amounts paid during the applicable year to the named executive officers. For Mr. Schweinfurth, includes an additional $16,181 that was paid in respect of Mr. Schweinfurth’s accrued vacation at the time of his retirement. For Mr. Mooberry, includes an additional $2,115 that was paid due to a change in payroll timing from 2014 to 2015.

(2)The amounts in the "bonus" column for 2016 reflect, for Mr. Sheehan, his contractual bonus paid for 2016. The amounts in that column for 2014 reflect discretionary cash bonus payments made to reward the applicable named executive officers for their contributions to close the Bally acquisition.
(3)The amounts in the “stock awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs awarded during the applicable year to the named executive officers, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The fair value of the RSUs was determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to the award by the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the grant date. For additional information, see our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(4)The amounts in the “option awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options awarded during the applicable year to the named executive officers, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The fair value of the stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model. For additional information, see our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(5)The amounts in the “non‑equity incentive plan compensation” column reflect the annual performance bonuses awarded under the SGICP.
(6)The amounts indicated in the “all other compensation” column for 2016 include the following:
(a)For Mr. Sheehan, relocation assistance of $400,353 and an additional payment of $284,994 to cover taxes on such assistance.
(b)Company contributions to the Company's 401(k) plan for Messrs. Sheehan ($9,275), Isaacs ($8,925), Quartieri ($9,105), Schweinfurth ($4,295), J. Kennedy ($8,925), Smail ($9,275), and Mooberry ($6,031).

(c)Cost of executive long-term disability insurance paid by the Company for Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri, Schweinfurth, J. Kennedy, Smail and Mooberry.
(d)Cost of an award trip and an additional payment of $4,217 to cover taxes for such award for Messrs. Isaacs, J. Kennedy and Mooberry.

(e)Severance ($950,000) and relocation assistance for Mr. Schweinfurth

(7)Mr. Isaacs ceased serving as President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2016, and terminated employment with the Company in December 2016.
(8)Mr. Schweinfurth retired from the Company effective February 29, 2016.

Grants of Plan‑Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2016
The table below provides information regarding the performance bonuses, stock options and RSUs granted to the named executive officers during 2016.
     EstimatedAll OtherAll Other Grant
     FutureStockOption Date Fair
 Estimated Future PayoutsPayoutsAwards:Awards:ExerciseValue of
 Under Non‑Equity IncentiveUnder EquityNumber ofNumber ofor BaseStock
 Plan AwardsIncentive PlanSharesSecuritiesPrice ofand
 
($)(1)
Awards(2)
of StockUnderlyingOptionOption
  ThresholdTargetMaximumTargetor UnitsOptionsAwardsAwards
NameGrant Date($)($)($)(#)
(#)(3)
(#)(4)
($/Sh)(5)
($)(6)
Kevin M. Sheehan08/10/2016400,000
3,660,000
 08/10/201667,370
616,436
 08/10/2016133,717
9.15
628,123
 08/10/2016133,717
9.15
616,435
M. Gavin Isaacs937,500 1,875,000 3,750,000
 06/21/2016103,626
999,991
 06/21/2016204,918
9.65
962,690
 06/21/2016204,918
9.65
985,656
Michael A. Quartieri225,000 450,000 900,000
 06/21/201625,906
249,993
 06/21/201651,229
9.65
240,669
 06/21/201651,229
9.65
246,411
James C. Kennedy271,875 543,750 1,087,500
 01/14/201670,000
470,400
 06/21/201631,303
302,074
 06/21/201661,902
9.65
290,811
 06/21/201661,902
9.65
297,749
David W. Smail225,000 450,000 900,000
 06/21/201625,906
249,993
 06/21/201651,229
9.65
240,669
 06/21/201651,229
9.65
246,411
Derik J. Mooberry206,250 412,500 825,000
 06/21/201623,747
229,159
 06/21/201646,960
9.65
220,614
 06/21/201646,960
9.65
225,878

(1)The amounts shown under the “estimated future payouts under non‑equity incentive plan awards” column represent the performance-based annual cash bonus opportunity approved for 2016 for each of the named executive officers, excluding Messrs. Sheehan and Schweinfurth who did not participate in the SGICP in 2016. The actual amounts awarded under the program for 2016 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table above under the “non‑equity incentive plan compensation” column.

(2)The amounts shown under the “estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards” column include the award of performance‑conditioned stock options granted under the 2003 Plan based upon each named executive officer’s equity award opportunity for 2016. These awards vest in equal amounts over four years contingent on satisfaction of a defined stock price hurdle. The stock price hurdle was achieved on February 2, 2017 and therefore the performance-conditioned options have converted to time-vesting on the schedule described. In the case of Mr. Sheehan, the 400,000 shares shown in that column are the shares received pursuant to an inducement award made upon commencement of his employment that vest contingent on the achievement of defined levels of EBITDA improvement over a three-year period.

(3)The amounts shown under the “all other stock awards” column reflect annual grants of time-vesting RSU awards that vest in four equal installments commencing March 20, 2017 and on the first three anniversaries of that date, except for the award of 70,000 RSUs to Mr. J. Kennedy, which will vest in four equal installments commencing January 14, 2017 and on the first four anniversaries of that date. For additional information regarding these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Objectives and Components of Compensation Program-Long‑Term Incentive Compensation-Annual Equity Awards” and “-Other 2016 Equity Awards.”

(4)The amount shown under the “all other option awards” column reflect annual grants of stock options that vest in four equal installments commencing March 20, 2017 and on the first three anniversaries of that date. For additional information regarding these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Objectives and Components of Compensation Program—Long‑Term Incentive Compensation—Annual Equity Awards.”
(5)The exercise price shown under the “exercise or base price of option awards” column represents the market value of our common stock on the grant date (which was calculated based on the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the grant date).
(6)The amounts indicated as the “grant date fair value” of the awards were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. In the case of RSUs, the fair value was determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to the award by the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the grant date. In the case of stock options, the fair value of the stock options is estimated on the grant date using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model. For additional information, see our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year‑End
The table below provides information with respect to the stock options and RSUs held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2016.

Option AwardsStock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
(1)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(1)
Kevin M. Sheehan08/10/2016
133,717(2)

9.15
08/09/2026




08/10/2016

133,717(3)

9.15
08/09/2026




08/10/2016






400,000(4)

5,600,000
08/10/2016




67,370(5)

943,180


M. Gavin Isaacs06/09/2014
80,590(6)

80,591(6)


8.73
06/08/2024




06/09/2014




42,968(7)

601,552


04/27/2015
52,493(8)

157,479(8)


12.83
04/26/2025




04/27/2015




78,917(9)

1,104,838


04/27/2015






105,222(10)

1,473,108
06/21/2016
204,918(2)


9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016

204,918(3)

9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016




103,626(5)

1,450,764


Michael A. Quartieri11/11/2015




18,243(9)

255,402


06/21/2016
51,229(2)


9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016

51,229(3)

9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016




25,906(5)

362,684


Scott D. Schweinfurth04/27/2015






21,921(10)

306,894
James C. Kennedy03/22/2011
33,730(11)



8.90
03/21/2021




01/01/2013




7,500(12)

105,000


03/25/2013




7,493(13)

104,902


12/20/2013




3,750(13)

52,500


03/20/2014
10,753(6)

10,753(6)


16.03
03/20/2024




04/27/2015
10,936(8)

32,808(8)


12.83
04/26/2025




04/27/2015




16,441(9)

230,174


04/27/2015






21,921(10)

306,894
06/21/2016
61,902(2)

9.65
6/20/2026




06/21/2016

61,902(3)

9.65
6/20/2026




01/14/2016




70,000(14)

980,000


06/21/2016




31,303(5)

438,242


David W. Smail08/03/2015
8,267(8)

24,801(8)


15.21
8/2/2025




08/03/2015




12,331(9)

172,634


08/03/2015






16,441(10)

230,174
06/21/2016
51,229(2)


9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016

51,229(3)

9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016




25,906(5)

362,684


Derik J. Mooberry11/19/2014




14,976(7)

209,664


04/27/2015
8,910(8)

26,733(8)


12.83
04/26/2025




04/27/2015




13,396(9)

187,544


04/27/2015






17,861(10)

250,054
06/21/2016
46,960(2)


9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016

46,960(3)

9.65
06/20/2026




06/21/2016




23,747(5)

332,458



(1)The value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs by the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016 ($14.00).
(2)These stock options are scheduled to become exercisable in four equal installments beginning on March 20, 2017. For Mr. Isaacs, pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, any of these stock options remaining unvested on June 30, 2018 will vest as long as Mr. Isaacs is still providing consulting services on such date.
(3)These stock options are scheduled to become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on March 20, 2017 (each, a "Vesting Date"), conditioned on the Company's common stock attaining the $15.00 Performance Goal on or before March 20, 2020. The $15.00 Performance Goal was achieved on February 2, 2017, and therefore the performance-conditioned options have converted to time-vesting as described in the first sentence

of this footnote. For Mr. Isaacs, pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, any of these stock options remaining unvested on June 30, 2018 will vest as long as Mr. Isaacs is still providing consulting services on such date.
(4)These RSUs are scheduled to cliff vest at the end of a three-year performance period from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019, contingent upon the achievement of performance criteria over such three-year period, as described above.
(5)These RSUs are scheduled to vest in four equal annual installments beginning on March 20, 2017. For Mr. Isaacs, pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, any of these RSUs remaining unvested on June 30, 2018 will vest as long as Mr. Isaacs is still providing consulting services on such date.
(6)These stock options were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. The first and second installments vested and became exercisable on the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant.

(7)These RSUs were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. The first and second installments vested on the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant.

(8)These stock options were awarded with a four‑year vesting schedule. The first installment became exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest in three equal installments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. For Mr. Isaacs, pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, any of these stock options remaining unvested on June 30, 2018 will vest as long as Mr. Isaacs is still providing consulting services on such date.

(9)These RSUs were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. The first installment vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest in three equal installments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. For Mr. Isaacs, pursuant to his Consulting Agreement, any of these RSUs remaining unvested on June 30, 2018 will vest as long as Mr. Isaacs is still providing consulting services on such date.

(10)These performance-conditioned RSUs were awarded with a three-year cliff vesting schedule, with the RSUs vesting in March 2018 contingent upon the achievement of multi-year performance criteria over the 2015-2017 period. Anywhere between 0% and 150% of these RSUs may vest depending on actual performance achieved relative to the predetermined criteria. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Objectives and Components of Compensation Program-Long‑Term Incentive Compensation-Previously Granted Annual Performance-Conditioned Awards” for additional information. In the case of Messrs. Isaacs and Schweinfurth, these performance-conditioned RSUs will continue to vest even though their employment terminated in 2016, however, payouts of shares upon vesting will be pro-rated based on the number of days worked during the 3-year performance period.

(11)These stock options were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. The first, second, third and fourth installments vested and became exercisable on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
(12)These RSUs were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. The first, second and third installments vested and became exercisable on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The balance is scheduled to vest in on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.
(13)These RSUs were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule, subject to the satisfaction of minimum performance criteria for 2013. The first installment vested in March 2014, based on attainment of the 2013 performance goal, the second installment vested on the second anniversary of the date of grant, the third installment vested on the third anniversary of the date of grant, and the balance is scheduled to vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.
(14)These RSUs were awarded with a four-year vesting schedule. They are scheduled to vest in equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2016
The table below provides information for the named executive officers with respect to stock options that were exercised and RSUs that vested during 2016.

 Option AwardsStock Awards
Name Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
Kevin M. Sheehan



M. Gavin Isaacs

47,789
494,568
Michael A. Quartieri

6,081
78,506
Scott D. Schweinfurth

84,718
821,765
James C. Kennedy

32,849
310,835
David W. Smail

4,110
42,991
Derik J. Mooberry

11,953
151,674

2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table sets forth detail about activity for the named executive officers in our nonqualified deferred compensation plan. All named executive officers are eligible to participate in the plan, which is designed to allow highly compensated and management employees to make contributions in excess of certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code that apply to our tax-qualified 401(k) plan. The plan only allows employee contributions, and the Company does not provide matching contributions under the plan (although the employee contributions are eligible for earnings on the deferred amounts).
Name Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year
($)
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions
($)
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
($)
Kevin M. Sheehan




M. Gavin Isaacs




Michael A. Quartieri




Scott D. Schweinfurth


85,519
1,693
James C. Kennedy




David W. Smail




Derik J. Mooberry





Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
For the named executive officers who remained employed on December 31, 2016, the information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements and their equity award agreements under the various termination events described below. For Messrs. Isaacs and Schweinfurth, who ceased to be employees during 2016, the information describes what became payable on such termination event under their employment agreement and separation agreement, respectively. In each case, the applicable agreements were the result of arm's length negotiations and were approved by the Committee and/or the Board.
Employment Agreements and Equity Award Agreements with Current Executive Officers. Each current executive officer's employment agreement provides that if his employment is terminated by the Company "without cause" or by the executive for "good reason" (as such terms are defined in the applicable agreement) (a "Qualifying Termination"), the executive would be entitled to receive (i) a pro rata bonus for the year of termination, (ii) an amount equal to the sum of his base salary and Severance Bonus Amount (as defined below), payable over a period of 12 months, and (iii) payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months if the executive elects to continue medical coverage under the Company's group health plan in accordance with COBRA. For Mr. Sheehan, if a Qualifying Termination occurs within his first year of employment, absent a "change in control" (as defined in his agreement), then the amount described in clause (ii) of the preceding sentence would be multiplied by two. If a Qualifying Termination occurs upon or within one year after a "change in control" (as such term is defined in the applicable agreement), then for each executive officer other than Mr. Mooberry the amount described in clause (ii) of the first sentence of this paragraph would be multiplied by two and payable in a lump sum if permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue

Code, otherwise, over a period of 24 months. An executive's "Severance Bonus Amount" is equal to the highest annual incentive compensation paid to him in respect of the two most recent fiscal years but not more than his target bonus for the then-current fiscal year, except that, (a) for Mr. Sheehan, if the Qualifying Termination had occurred in 2016 or occurs in 2017, such amount would be Mr. Sheehan's target bonus for the year of termination or (b) for Messrs. Quartieri, Smail and Mooberry, if such Qualifying Termination had occurred prior to payment of annual bonuses for fiscal year 2016, the "Severance Bonus Amount" would have been the executive's target bonus for 2016.
In the event of a current executive officer's death, his beneficiary or estate would be entitled to receive any benefits that may be payable under any life insurance benefit of his for which the Company pays premiums. In the event of a current executive officer's termination due to his "total disability" (as such term is defined in the applicable agreement), each executive officer would be entitled to receive disability payments pursuant to a disability plan sponsored or maintained by the Company and Mr. J. Kennedy would be entitled to receive an amount equal to his base salary less the amount of such disability payments. Each current executive officer would also be entitled to certain payments upon the expiration of the term of his employment agreement following the Company's failure to renew the term. Only Mr. Mooberry's employment agreement was subject to renewal in 2016, and if the term of his agreement had expired on December 31, 2016 as a result of the Company's failure to renew, Mr. Mooberry would have become entitled to receive an amount equal to his annual base salary, payable over 12 months.
Each of Messrs. Sheehan, Quartieri, J. Kennedy and Smail would vest in full in any equity awards held by them upon a Qualifying Termination, subject to the Committee's determination that any applicable performance targets have been achieved in the case of performance-conditioned awards; provided, however, Mr. Sheehan's August 2016 inducement grant of 400,000 performance-conditioned RSUs would only vest if such termination occurred after February 4, 2018, in which case such award would be subject to pro rata vesting based on increased EBITDA, calculated similarly to SGICP EBITDA, during the period of Mr. Sheehan's employment. In the case of Mr. Mooberry, upon a termination by the Company "without cause" only, he would receive pro rata vesting of his performance-conditioned RSUs granted on April 27, 2015 upon the Committee's determination that the applicable target had been achieved. In the case of a "change in control" (as defined in the 2003 Plan), all outstanding equity awards held by an executive officer would vest upon such change in control. Under the terms of our standard equity award agreement (which terms are not applicable to Mr. Sheehan's inducement grant), unvested stock options and RSUs held by an employee (including a named executive officer) would vest upon the termination of such employee's employment by reason of death or "disability" (as such term is defined in the applicable agreement); provided, however, that any performance-conditioned awards would only vest at the time, and only to the extent, that the Committee determined that the applicable target had been achieved.
Each employment agreement also contains, among other things, covenants imposing on the executive officer certain obligations with respect to confidentiality and proprietary information and restricting his ability to engage in certain activities in competition with the Company during the term of his employment and for a period of 12 months (18 months in the case of Mr. J. Kennedy) after termination. Incentive-based compensation and benefits provided under the agreement will be subject to recovery under the Company's "clawback" policy, described above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Certain Corporate Governance Policies - Clawback".

The amounts described below are estimates, and the actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of the executive’s separation. The amounts described below would be in addition to amounts the individual would receive under accrued plans, such as the non‑qualified deferred compensation plan, the 401(k) plan, and previously vested equity or bonus awards, as to which neither the named executive officer’s employment agreement nor the plans provide for enhanced benefits or payments upon termination. The value shown below for equity awards that would have accelerated had the specified termination event occurred on the last business day of the year was calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to the acceleration by the closing price of our common stock on that day, which was $14.00 (and, in the case of stock options, reducing the value, but not below zero, by the exercise price for such options).

In the event that the payments and benefits provided to Mr. Sheehan in connection with a change in control were subject to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Sheehan’s employment agreement provides for a “best net” cutback, such that Mr. Sheehan will receive either the full amount of such payments and benefits or payments and benefits with a value equal to one dollar less than the threshold that would subject Mr. Sheehan to such excise tax, whichever would result in a greater after-tax amount.


Mr. Sheehan
The following describes the estimated amounts Mr. Sheehan would have received if the termination event specified occurred at December 31, 2016:
 
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination
for Cause
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
(w/ Change in
Control)(a)
Termination
Due to
Death
Termination
Due to
Disability
Cash Payments      
Base Salary

$3,600,000(b)(c)
$3,600,000(c)(i)


Severance Bonus Amount

$1,800,000(b)(d)
$1,800,000(d)(i)


Pro Rata Bonus for Year of Termination

$900,000(e)
$900,000(e)


Total Cash Payments

$6,300,000$6,300,000

Benefits & Perquisites      
Health and Welfare Benefits

$6,035(f)
$6,035(f)
$3,600,000(f)

Total Benefits & Perquisites

$6,035$6,035$3,600,000
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation      
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options

$1,297,055(g)
$1,297,055(g)
$1,297,055(g)

$1,297,055(g)

Value of Accelerated RSUs

$943,180(h)
$6,543,180(h)
$943,180(h)

$943,180(h)

Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards

$2,240,235$7,840,235$2,240,235$2,240,235
Total Value of Payments and Benefits

$8,546,270$14,146,270$5,840,235$2,240,235

(a)
Qualifying Terminationupon or within one year immediately following a change in control.
(b)Paid over 12 months.
(c)Amount reflects two times base salary.
(d)Amount reflects two times Severance Bonus Amount (which for 2016 would have been his contractual bonus amount).
(e)Amount reflects pro rata bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is contractual bonus for 2016). Paid in lump sum.
(f)Upon termination other than due to death, amount reflects payment of an amount equal to the cost of continued health coverage under the Company's insurance coverage under COBRA for 12 months. Upon termination due to death, amount reflects Company‑provided life insurance benefits available to all benefit-eligible employees (equal to two times base salary up to $4,000,000).
(g)Reflects full vesting of stock options, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned options. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(h)Reflects full vesting of time-vesting RSUs, and, in the case of a change in control, full vesting of performance-conditioned RSUs at a target payout level, effective upon the change in control.
(i)Paid over 24 months (or in a lump sum if permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code).


Mr. Quartieri
The following describes the estimated amounts Mr. Quartieri would have received if the termination event specified occurred at December 31, 2016:
 
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination
for Cause
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
(w/ Change in
Control)(a)
Termination
Due to
Death
Termination
Due to
Disability
Cash Payments      
Base Salary

$600,000(b)
$1,200,000(h)(i)


Severance Bonus Amount

$450,000(c)
$900,000(i)(j)


Pro Rata Bonus for Year of Termination

$305,417(d)
$305,417(d)


Total Cash Payments

$1,355,417$2,405,417

Benefits & Perquisites      
Health and Welfare Benefits

$18,735(e)
$18,735(e)
$1,200,000(e)


Total Benefits & Perquisites

$18,735$18,735$1,200,000
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation      
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options

$445,692(f)
$445,692(f)
$445,692(f)

$445,692(f)

Value of Accelerated RSUs

$618,086(g)
$618,086(g)
$618,086(g)

$618,086(g)

Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards

$1,063,778$1,063,778$1,063,778$1,063,778
Total Value of Payments and Benefits

$2,437,930$3,487,930$2,263,778$1,063,778

(a)Qualifying Termination upon or within one year immediately following a change in control.
(b)Paid over 12 months.
(c)Amount reflects Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is target 2016 bonus. Paid over 12 months.
(d)Amount reflects pro rata bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is actual 2016 bonus). Paid in lump sum.
(e)Upon termination other than due to death, amount reflects payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months. Upon termination due to death, amount reflects Company‑provided life insurance benefits available to all benefit-eligible employees (equal to two times base salary up to $4,000,000).
(f)Reflects full vesting of stock options, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned options. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(g)Reflects full vesting of time-vesting RSUs (Mr. Quartieri does not hold performance-conditioned RSUs). In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(h)Amount reflects two times base salary.
(i)Paid over 24 months (or in a lump sum if permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code).
(j)Amount reflects two times Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is two times target 2016 bonus.
Mr. J. Kennedy
The following describes the estimated amounts Mr. J. Kennedy would have received if the termination event specified occurred at December 31, 2016:

 
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination
for Cause
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
(w/ Change in
Control)(a)
Termination
Due to
Death
Termination
Due to
Disability
Cash Payments      
Base Salary

$725,000(b)
$1,450,000(h)(i)

$725,000(k)

Severance Bonus Amount

$327,343(c)
$654,686(i)(j)


Pro Rata Bonus for Year of Termination

$542,119(d)
$542,119(d)


Total Cash Payments

$1,594,462$2,646,805
$725,000
Benefits & Perquisites      
Health and Welfare Benefits

$12,540(e)
$12,540(e)
1,450,000(e)

Total Benefits & Perquisites

$12,540$12,540$1,450,000
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation      
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options

$576,932(f)
$576,932(f)
$576,932(f)

$576,932(f)

Value of Accelerated RSUs

$2,217,712(g)
$2,217,712(g)
$2,217,712(g)

$2,217,712(g)

Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards

$2,794,644$2,794,644$2,794,644$2,794,644
Total Value of Payments and Benefits

$4,401,646$5,453,989$4,244,644$3,519,644

(a)Qualifying Termination upon or within one year immediately following a change in control.
(b)Paid over 12 months.
(c)Amount reflects Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is actual 2014 bonus. Paid over 12 months.
(d)Amount reflects pro rata bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is actual 2016 bonus). Paid in lump sum.
(e)Upon termination other than due to death, amount reflects payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months. Upon termination due to death, amount reflects Company‑provided life insurance benefits available to all benefit-eligible employees (equal to two times base salary up to $4,000,000).
(f)Reflects full vesting of stock options, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned options. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(g)Reflects full vesting of RSUs, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned RSUs. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(h)Amount reflects two times base salary.
(i)Paid over 24 months (or in a lump sum if such change in control constitutes a change in control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code).
(j)Amount reflects two times Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is two times actual 2014 bonus.
(k)Paid over 12 months. Amount to be reduced by any disability payments to executive under any Company disability plan.
Mr. Smail
The following describes the estimated amounts Mr. Smail would have received if the termination event specified occurred at December 31, 2016:

 
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination
for Cause
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
(w/ Change in
Control)(a)
Termination
Due to
Death
Termination
Due to
Disability
Cash Payments      
Base Salary

$600,000(b)
$1,200,000(h)(i)


Severance Bonus Amount

$450,000(c)
$900,000(i)(j)


Pro Rata Bonus for Year of Termination

$329,850(d)
$329,850(d)


Total Cash Payments

$1,379,850$2,429,850

Benefits & Perquisites      
Health and Welfare Benefits

$18,142(e)
$18,142(e)
$1,200,000(e)


Total Benefits & Perquisites

$18,142$18,142$1,200,000
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation      
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options

$445,692(f)
$445,692(f)
$445,692(f)

$445,692(f)

Value of Accelerated RSUs

$765,492(g)
$765,492(g)
$765,492(g)

$765,492(g)

Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards

$1,211,184$1,211,184$1,211,184$1,211,184
Total Value of Payments and Benefits

$2,609,176$3,659,176$2,411,184$1,211,184

(a)Qualifying Termination upon or within one year immediately following a change in control.
(b)Paid over 12 months.
(c)Amount reflects Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is target 2016 bonus. Paid over 12 months.
(d)Amount reflects pro rata bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is actual 2016 bonus). Paid in lump sum.
(e)Upon termination other than due to death, amount reflects payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months. Upon termination due to death, amount reflects Company‑provided life insurance benefits available to all benefit‑eligible employees (equal to 1.5 times base salary up to $1,000,000).
(f)Reflects full vesting of stock options, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned options. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(g)Reflects full vesting of RSUs, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned RSUs. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(h)Amount reflects two times base salary.
(i)Paid over 24 months (or in a lump sum if permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code).
(j)Amount reflects two times Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is two times target 2016 bonus.
Mr. Mooberry
The following describes the estimated amounts Mr. Mooberry would have received if the termination event specified occurred on December 31, 2016:

 
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination
for Cause
Expiration of Term
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
(w/ Change in
Control)(a)
Termination
Due to
Death
Termination
Due to
Disability
Cash Payments       
Base Salary

$550,000(b)

$550,000(b)

$550,000(b)


Severance Bonus Amount


$412,500(c)

$412,500(c)


Pro Rata Bonus for Year of Termination


$315,563(d)

$315,563(d)


Total Cash Payments

$550,000
$1,278,063
$1,278,063

Benefits & Perquisites       
Health and Welfare Benefits


$13,263(e)

$13,263(e)
$1,100,000(e)

Total Benefits & Perquisites


$13,263$13,263$1,100,000
Long‑Term Incentive Compensation       
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options



$439,829(f)
$439,829(f)

$439,829(f)

Value of Accelerated RSUs


$156,731(g)

$979,720(h)
$979,720(h)

$979,720(h)

Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards


$156,731
$1,419,549$1,419,549$1,419,549
Total Value of Payments and Benefits

$550,000
$1,448,057$2,710,875$2,519,549$1,419,549


(a)Qualifying Termination upon or within one year immediately following a change in control.
(b)Paid over 12 months.
(c)Amount reflects one times Severance Bonus Amount. Amount shown is one times target 2016 bonus. Paid over 12 months.
(d)Amount reflects pro rata bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is actual 2016 bonus). Paid in lump sum.
(e)Upon termination other than due to death, amount reflects payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months. Upon termination due to death, amount reflects Company‑provided life insurance benefits available to all benefit‑eligible employees (equal to two times base salary up to $4,000,000).
(f)Reflects full vesting of stock options, at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned options. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.
(g)Reflects, in the event of a termination by the Company without "cause" only, pro-rata vesting of the performance-conditioned RSUs granted on April 27, 2015 at a target payout level.

(h)Reflects full vesting of RSUs at a target payout level in the case of performance-conditioned RSUs. In the case of a change in control, such vesting would occur upon the change in control.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Isaacs. On August 4, 2016, the Company modified its employment agreement with Mr. Isaacs to reflect the change of his role from President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company to Vice Chairman of the Board. Mr. Isaacs’ modified employment agreement expired on December 31, 2016, and effective January 1, 2017, his service as Vice Chairman continued pursuant to a consulting agreement which provides for Mr. Isaacs’ continued service through June 30, 2018 in exchange for consulting fees of $83,333.33 per month and the opportunity to earn a discretionary bonus for 2017.
Under Mr. Isaacs’ consulting agreement, unvested equity awarded to him as President and Chief Executive Officer remains outstanding and will continue, to vest in accordance with their vesting schedules, subject to Mr. Isaacs’ continued service as a consultant through the applicable vesting date and achievement of any applicable performance criteria, provided that any such equity awards that remain outstanding on June 30, 2018 will immediately vest as of such date if Mr. Isaacs is still providing services to the Company as of such date, subject to achievement of any applicable performance criteria. In the event that the Company terminates the Consulting Agreement prior to June 30, 2018 without “cause” (as defined in Mr. Isaacs’ modified

employment agreement), Mr. Isaacs will be entitled to receive the monthly consulting fee through June 30, 2018, and Mr. Isaac’s equity awards will be treated as if he had continued providing services to the Company through June 30, 2018. In addition, Mr. Isaac’s outstanding equity awards will vest upon a “change in control” (as defined in the 2003 Plan).

The following describes the amounts Mr. Isaacs received as a result of the termination of his employment on December 31, 2016:
 Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason 
Cash Payments  
Consulting Fees$1,500,000
(a) 
2016 Bonus$1,375,374
(b)(c) 
Total Cash Payments$2,875,374
 
Benefits & Perquisites  
Health and Welfare Benefits$19,380
(d) 
Total Benefits & Perquisites$19,380
 
LongTerm Incentive Compensation
  
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options
(e) 
Value of Accelerated RSUs
(e) 
Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards
 
Total Value of Payments and Benefits$2,894,754
 

(a)Amount reflects consulting fees paid over 18 months.
(b)Amount reflects bonus that would have been received for year of termination (amount shown is actual 2016 bonus). Paid in lump sum.
(c)Mr. Isaacs is eligible for a discretionary bonus for 2017.
(d)Amount reflects payment of estimated COBRA premiums, less executive’s contributions, for 18 months.
(e)Outstanding equity grants continue to vest in accordance with their terms, no equity awards vested upon Mr. Isaacs' termination of employment. Remaining equity will vest on June 30, 2018 per the terms of the consulting agreement if Mr. Isaacs continues to provide services through such date or if the consulting agreement is terminated by the Company prior to such date without cause. In addition, equity awards would vest in full upon a change in control. If a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2016, Mr. Isaacs would have vested in equity awards with a value of $7,022,014.
Separation Agreement with Mr. Schweinfurth
On November 12, 2015, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Schweinfurth pursuant to which, following his then-anticipated retirement from the Company, which occurred on February 29, 2016, Mr. Schweinfurth would receive (i) $1,100,000 in severance payments, payable in bi-weekly installments over a twelve-month period, (ii) no later than March 15, 2016, the annual bonus payable to him for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the SGICP (which amount is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”) and (iii) up to $160,000 in aggregate payments relating to outstanding costs associated with Mr. Schweinfurth’s relocation from Chicago to Las Vegas. The separation agreement also provided that all unvested stock options and RSUs would be accelerated and vest on the date Mr. Schweinfurth’s release of claims in favor of the Company became effective (the “Release Effective Date”), provided that the 21,921 RSUs granted on April 27, 2015 (the “LTIP RSUs”) will only vest pro rata and only once the Committee has determined that the applicable performance criteria have been satisfied. The value of the LTIP RSUs that Mr. Schweinfurth remains eligible to vest in, based on the closing price of our common stock on the Release Effective Date and assuming a target payout level, is $84,400. In addition, Mr. Schweinfurth received payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months following his separation date after Mr. Schweinfurth elected to continue medical coverage under the Company’s group health plan in accordance with COBRA, with a value of $18,481. Mr. Schweinfurth’s separation agreement also contains a general release and covenants imposing on him certain obligations with respect to non-disparagement, confidentiality and proprietary information, and restricting his ability to engage in certain activities in competition with the Company for a period of 12 months after his separation date.

The following describes the amounts Mr. Schweinfurth received as a result of the termination of his employment on February 29, 2016:
Termination
Without
Cause or for
Good Reason
Cash Payments
Severance$1,100,000
(a)
Total Cash Payments$1,100,000
Benefits & Perquisites
Health and Welfare Benefits$18,481
(b)
Total Benefits & Perquisites$18,481
LongTerm Incentive Compensation
“Spread” Value of Accelerated Options
(c)
Value of Accelerated RSUs$840,403
(d)
Total Value of Accelerated Equity Awards$840,403
Total Value of Payments and Benefits$1,958,884
(a)Amount paid in equal installments over 12 months from termination date.
(b)Amount reflects payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months.
(c)On the Release Effective Date (March 9, 2016), the closing price of our common stock ($9.92) did not exceed the exercise price of any of Mr. Schweinfurth’s outstanding options.
(d)Represents the value of the RSUs that vested on the Release Effective Date (March 9, 2016), based on the closing price of our common stock on that day ($9.92).
Equity Compensation Plan Information 
        The following table provides information about the shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options, warrants and other stock rights under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016.
Plan Category
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(3)
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

6,849,711
$11.304,000,806
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
938,953
$8.9969,157

(1) The "Equity compensation plans approved by security holders" consist of the 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2003 Plan. Under the 2003 Plan, as of December 31, 2016 4,000,806 of the shares remaining available for future awards could be used for RSUs or other "full-value" awards, options or SARs. 
(2) The "Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders" consist of (a) employment inducement equity awards comprised of 428,615 options and 510,338 RSUs granted during 2014 and 2016 and (b) our 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (discussed below).

(3) The weighted average exercise price of outstanding awards does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of RSUs which have no exercise price. At December 31, 2016, there was a total of 4,360,440 shares subject to RSUs which were outstanding under the 2003 Plan, including 71,098 vested RSUs that are subject to deferral. Had those RSUs been included in calculating the weighted average exercise price (treating them in effect as options with an exercise price of $0), the weighted average exercise price for awards under

security holder-approved plans would have been $4.11, the weighted average exercise price for awards under non-security holder-approved plans would have been $4.10, and the weighted average exercise price for all outstanding awards would have been $4.11.

        Inducement Stock Options.    At December 31, 2016, 161,181 options and 42,968 RSUs granted during 2014 and 267,434 options and 467,370 RSUs granted during 2016 under employment inducement award agreements to newly hired employees remained outstanding. The 2014 options were granted at an exercise price of $8.73 per share and have a ten-year term. The 2016 options were granted at an exercise price of $9.15 per share and have a ten-year term. The 2014 options become exercisable and the 2014 RSUs vest in four equal annual installments on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The 2016 options become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on March 20, 2017 and 67,370 of the 2016 RSUs are scheduled to vest in four equal annual installments beginning on March 20, 2017 and 400,000 are scheduled to cliff vest at the end of a three-year performance period from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2019, contingent upon the achievement of performance criteria over such three-year period.
        1995 Equity Incentive Plan.    The 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the "1995 Plan"), which was originally adopted by our Board in May 1995, authorizes grants of non-qualified options, deferred stock and other stock-related awards to employees who are not executive officers or directors. As of December 31, 2016, no shares were subject to outstanding awards under the 1995 Plan and 69,157 shares remained available for grant under the 1995 Plan. The 1995 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, which is authorized to select the participants, determine the type of awards to be granted and the number of shares of common stock to which awards will relate, specify times at which awards will be exercisable, set other terms and conditions of such awards, interpret and specify rules and regulations relating to the 1995 Plan and make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 1995 Plan. The Board may amend, suspend, discontinue or terminate the 1995 Plan or the Compensation Committee's authority to grant awards thereunder without stockholder approval, except as required by law or regulation or under the NASDAQ Stock Market rules which would require stockholder approval for material modifications of the 1995 Plan.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
The Company has written policies and procedures relating to related party transactions. The Audit Committee, with assistance from the Chief Legal Officer, is responsible for reviewing and approving related person transactions that are subject to SEC disclosure requirements under Item 404 of Regulation S-K (each a “Related Party Transaction”), including transactions in which the Company is a participant, the amount exceeds $120,000 and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. A related person includes a director, executive officer, nominee for election as a director, person holding more than 5% of our stock and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, or any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. The Company’s policy is not to enter into a Related Party Transaction unless both the Audit Committee and the Board approve the transaction as specified in the Audit Committee’s charter. Other transactions with related persons as well as certain material changes in previously approved relationships may also require legal department or compliance department approval under our policies and procedures.


PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE


COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

   The Company is seeking an advisory vote on executive compensation from stockholders, commonly known as the say-on-pay vote, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act. The advisory vote on executive compensation is a non-binding vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in this Proxy Statement.
        The Company's executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executive officers who are able to achieve corporate objectives and create stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes the Company's executive compensation programs reflect a strong pay-for-performance philosophy and are well aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

        Highlights of our executive compensation program include:

At-risk pay.  Executive pay is substantially at risk because it largely consists of one or more types of performance-based compensation that vary in value based on our stock price, or that can only be earned upon achievement of pre-approved financial targets.
SGICP cash bonus program reviewed annually; payouts based on rigorous financial performance targets.  The Compensation Committee reviews the bonus program design each year with a view to realizing desired corporate objectives. In recent years, this review has focused on structuring a payout scale that the Compensation Committee has deemed appropriate in light of our growth objectives and our interest in managing incentive compensation costs. Annual SGICP bonuses to the named executive officers are dependent upon achievement of pre-approved financial performance targets, and have been recently subject to discretionary reductions (but not increases). Annual SGICP bonuses for our named executive officers with Company-wide responsibilities have varied with the Company's financial performance over the past five years.

Use of Performance-conditioned Restricted Stock Units and Performance-conditioned Stock Options.  Mr. Sheehan was awarded performance-conditioned RSUs with a three-year performance period in connection with joining the Company. In 2015, the Company used performance-conditioned RSUs that vest based on three-year cumulative EBITDA achievement as 1/3 of the equity component for Messrs. Isaacs, Schweinfurth, J. Kennedy and Mooberry. In 2016, Messrs. Isaacs, Quartieri, J. Kennedy, Smail and Mooberry received 1/3 of their annual equity grant in the form of performance-conditioned stock options where vesting is also dependent on stock price.
No guaranteed salary increases.  Our named executive officers are not entitled to contractual inflation-based salary increases.
Stock ownership guidelines.  Since 2013, we have had stock ownership guidelines in place for our chief executive officer, his direct reports and directors in order to encourage a long-term perspective in managing the Company and to further align the interests of senior executives and directors with the interests of stockholders. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Certain Corporate Governance Policies—Stock Ownership Guidelines" above for additional information. 
Clawback policy.  Since 2013, we have had in place a "clawback" policy subjecting cash and equity incentive compensation paid to senior executives (including the named executive officers) to recovery in the event that the Company's financial statements are restated due to fraud or gross misconduct. 
No-hedging policy.  Since 2013, we have had a policy prohibiting employees and directors from engaging in hedging transactions. 
Independent compensation consulting firm.  The Compensation Committee benefits from its utilization of an independent compensation consulting firm, which provides no other services to the Company. 
No above-market returns.  We do not offer preferential or above-market returns on deferred compensation. 
The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section above provides a more detailed discussion of our executive compensation programs.
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers for 2016, as disclosed under SEC rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related materials included in the Company's 2017 Proxy Statement.

This advisory vote on executive compensation is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board and/or Compensation Committee will take into account the result of the vote when determining future executive compensation arrangements.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL TO APPROVE,
ON AN ADVISORY BASIS,
THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

PROPOSAL 3
INDICATION, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE FREQUENCY OF
FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Company is providing stockholders with an advisory vote on the frequency with which the Company shall hold the advisory vote on executive compensation described in Proposal 2 above, commonly known as the say-on-pay vote, and required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act.
The advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote is a non-binding vote on how often the say-on-pay vote should occur. The choices include: every year, every two years or every three years. In addition, stockholders may abstain from voting.
 Although this advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee, the Board and/or Compensation Committee will take into account the result of the vote when determining the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.
 After careful consideration, the Board and Compensation Committee have determined that holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year is the most appropriate policy for our stockholders and the Company at this time. The Board believes an annual frequency (i.e., every year) is the optimal frequency for the say on pay vote for a number of reasons, including:
It will prompt stockholders to review, evaluate and provide regular feedback on the Company’s compensation philosophy, policies and practices.
The results will give our Compensation Committee and Board timely insight into whether our stockholders generally believe that our compensation programs are structured properly.
An advisory vote on executive compensation each year is consistent with the Company’s approach to annual elections of members of the Board and annual ratification of its independent outside auditor.
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation determine, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which the stockholders of the Company shall have an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers set forth in the Company's proxy statement is:
Choice 1—1 Year;
Choice 2—2 Years;
Choice 3— 3 Years; or
Choice 4—Abstain from voting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE EVERY "1 YEAR" IN CONNECTION WITH OUR ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board that is available on the Company’s website at www.scientificgames.com.

The Audit Committee oversees the accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes of the Company. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent auditor for the Company. The Committee also discussed and reviewed with Deloitte & Touche LLP all communications required under generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), including the matters required to be discussed by Deloitte & Touche LLP with the Audit Committee under PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, and SEC Rule 2‑07 of Regulation S‑X.
In addition, Deloitte & Touche LLP provided to the Audit Committee a formal written statement describing all relationships between Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Company that might bear on Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence as required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP any matters that could have impacted Deloitte & Touche LLP’s objectivity and independence from the Company and management, including the provision of non‑audit services to the Company. Nothing came to the Audit Committee’s attention as a result of its review of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s statement or its discussions with Deloitte & Touche LLP that would indicate that Deloitte & Touche LLP lacked such objectivity or independence. Based on these reviews and discussions and in reliance thereon, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the Company be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee

Michael J. Regan, Chairman
Peter A. Cohen
Gerald J. Ford

PROPOSAL 4
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and stockholders are being asked to ratify such appointment at the annual meeting.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Approval of the proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent auditor requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote represented at the meeting. If the appointment is not ratified by stockholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider such appointment and may choose in its sole discretion to confirm the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP or to engage a different firm to serve as the Company's independent auditor.
Fees Paid to Independent Auditor
Aggregate fees billed to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 by our independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates were approximately:
 2016 Fees2015 Fees
Audit Fees:
$6,382,726

$6,296,537
Audit‑Related Fees:
$15,300

$144,490
Tax Fees:
$2,555,800

$2,577,883
All Other Fees:
$778,241

$624,205
The Audit Fees listed above were billed in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, Sarbanes‑Oxley Section 404 attestation, statutory audits of foreign subsidiary financial statements and recurring gaming related regulatory audits and attestation services. The Audit‑Related Fees listed above were billed in connection with the professional services performed in 2016 in connection with Form S-8 consent issuance and in 2015 in connection with Form S-4 debt exchange offer. The Tax

Fees listed above were billed for tax compliance, planning and advice. All Other Fees listed above were billed for services provided in connection with agreed‑upon procedures and related reports for lottery games. All of the fees set forth in the table above were pre‑approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the procedures described below.
Pre‑Approval Policy for Services Performed by Independent Auditor
The Audit Committee has responsibility for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee must pre‑approve all permissible services to be performed by the independent auditor.
The Audit Committee has adopted an auditor pre‑approval policy that sets forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which pre‑approval may be given for services performed by the independent auditor. Under the policy, the Audit Committee must give prior approval for any amount or type of service within four categories—audit, audit‑related, tax services or, to the extent permitted by law, other services—that the independent auditor provides. Prior to the annual engagement, the Audit Committee may grant general pre‑approval for independent auditor services within these four categories at maximum pre‑approved fee levels. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent auditor for additional services not contemplated in the original pre‑approval and, in those instances, such service will require separate pre‑approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent auditor. For any pre‑approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence, whether the auditor is best‑positioned to provide the most cost‑effective and efficient service and whether the service might enhance the Company’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members authority to approve a request for pre‑approval, provided the member reports any approval so given to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2017

OTHER MATTERS
We are not aware of any matter other than those described in this Proxy Statement that will be acted upon at the annualspecial meeting. In the event that any other matter properly comes before the meeting for a vote of stockholders, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such other matter.

We will pay the costs of proxy solicitation. Proxies are being solicited primarily by mail, but, in addition, our officers and employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or electronically.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

Pursuant to Rule 14a‑14a8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), if a stockholder wants to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials for the next annual meeting of stockholders, it must be received at our principal executive offices, 6650 S. El Camino6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89118,NV 89119, Attention: Corporate Secretary, not later than January 1, 2018. In order to avoid controversy, stockholders should submit proposals by such means, including electronic means, which permit them to prove the date of delivery.

If a stockholder intends to present a proposal for consideration at the next annual meeting outside of the processes of Rule 14a‑814a-8 under the Exchange Act, we must receive notice of such proposal at the address given above by March 17, 2018, or such notice will be considered untimely under Rule 14a‑4(c)14a-4(c)(1) under the Exchange Act, and our proxies will have discretionary voting authority with respect to such proposal, if presented at the annual meeting, without including information regarding such proposal in our proxy materials.

The deadlines described above are calculated by reference to the mailing date of the proxy materials for this year’s annual meeting. If the Board changes the date of next year’s annual meeting by more than 30 days, the Board will, in a timely manner, inform stockholders of such change and the effect of such change on the deadlines given above by including a notice in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K,10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q,10-Q, a current report on Form 8‑K8-K or by any other means reasonably calculated to inform the stockholders.

Your cooperation in giving this matter your immediate attention and in returning your proxy promptly will be appreciated.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.  You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.  Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC website at www.sec.gov. You also may obtain free copies of the documents we file with the SEC, including this Proxy Statement, by going to the Investors link of our corporate website at www.scientificgames.com.  Our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only.  The information provided on our website, other than copies of the documents listed below that have been filed with the SEC, is not part of this Proxy Statement, and therefore is not incorporated herein by reference.

22



Statements contained in this Proxy Statement, or in any document incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement regarding the contents of any contract or other document, are not necessarily complete and each such statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to that contract or other document filed as an exhibit with the SEC.  The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” into this Proxy Statement documents we file with the SEC.  This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents.  The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this Proxy Statement, and later information that we file with the SEC will update and supersede that information.  We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any documents filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this Proxy Statement and before the date of the special meeting.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016;
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017;
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 24, 2017, August 4, 2017 and August 14, 2017; and
Our proxy statement on Schedule 14A for our 2017 Annual Meeting filed with the SEC on May 1, 2017 and the additional definitive proxy soliciting materials on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on May 1, 2017.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, information furnished under Items 2.02 and 7.01 of any Current Report on Form 8-K, including the related exhibits, is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

THIS PROXY STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE SOLICITATION OF A PROXY IN ANY JURISDICTION TO OR FROM ANY PERSON TO WHOM OR FROM WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION IN THAT JURISDICTION.  YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK AT THE SPECIAL MEETING.  WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.  THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED [            ], 2017.  YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THAT DATE, AND THE MAILING OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO STOCKHOLDERS DOES NOT CREATE ANY IMPLICATION TO THE CONTRARY.

 By Order of the Board of Directors
 
mqa03.jpg
    
 
Michael A. Quartieri
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
Dated: May 1,[                ], 2017
 

23



Appendix A- ReconciliationANNEX A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this “Agreement”), dated as of SGICP EBITDASeptember 18, 2017, is entered into between Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and SGICP EBITDA Minus CapExSG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“NewCo”).

WHEREAS, the Company, whose shares of common stock are registered pursuant to Net LossSection 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), desires to reincorporate as a Nevada corporation and has formed NewCo in order to effectuate the reincorporation.

WHEREAS, the board of directors of each of the Company and NewCo deems it advisable, fair to and in the best interests of such corporations and their respective stockholders that the Company be merged with and into NewCo, upon the terms and subject to the conditions herein stated, and that NewCo be the surviving corporation (the “Reincorporation Merger”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements of the parties hereto contained herein, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

ARTICLE I
The Reincorporation Merger; Effective Time

SECTION 1.1.  The Reincorporation Merger.  Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, at the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.2), the Company reports its financial resultsshall be merged with and into NewCo whereupon the separate existence of the Company shall cease.  NewCo shall be the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) in the Reincorporation Merger and shall continue to be a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Nevada.  The Reincorporation Merger shall have the effects specified in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended (the “DGCL”) and the Nevada Revised Statutes, as amended (the “NRS”), and the Surviving Corporation shall succeed, without other transfer, to all of the assets and property (whether real, personal or mixed), rights, privileges, franchises, immunities and powers of the Company, and shall assume and be subject to all of the liabilities, obligations and restrictions of every kind and description of the Company, including, without limitation, all outstanding indebtedness of the Company.

SECTION 1.2.  Effective Time.  Unless this Agreement is terminated or abandoned in accordance with accountingits terms, as soon as practicable following the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Article V in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Company and NewCo shall cause Articles of Merger to be executed and filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of Nevada (the “Nevada Articles of Merger”) and a Certificate of Merger to be executed and filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of Delaware (the “Delaware Certificate of Merger”).  The Reincorporation Merger shall become effective upon the date and time specified in the Nevada Articles of Merger and the Delaware Certificate of Merger (the “Effective Time”).

ARTICLE II
Articles and Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation

SECTION 2.1.  The Articles of Incorporation.  The articles of incorporation of NewCo in effect at the Effective Time shall be amended and restated as set forth on Exhibit A hereto, including to change the name of the Surviving Corporation to “Scientific Games Corporation”, and such amended and restated articles shall be the articles of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation (such articles of incorporation, as so amended and restated, the “Articles of Incorporation”), until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions provided therein or applicable law.  Following the amendment and restatement of the Articles of Incorporation, the Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto (the “Certificate of Designation”) shall be filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of Nevada.

SECTION 2.2.  The Bylaws.  Subject to the provisions of applicable laws, the bylaws of NewCo in effect at the Effective Time shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation (the “Bylaws”), until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions provided therein or applicable law.





ARTICLE III
Officers, Directors, Committees, and Corporate Policies of the Surviving Corporation

SECTION 3.1.  Officers.  The officers of the Company at the Effective Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, become the officers of the Surviving Corporation, until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws.

SECTION 3.2.  Directors.  The board of directors of the Surviving Corporation effective as of, and immediately following, the Effective Time shall consist of all of the directors of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time, each to serve in such capacity until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws.

SECTION 3.3.  Committees.  Each committee of the board of directors of the Company existing immediately prior to the Effective time shall, effective as of, and immediately following, the Effective Time, become a committee of the board of directors of the Surviving Corporation, consisting of the members of such committee of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time and governed by the charter of such committee of the Company in existence immediately prior to the Effective Time, which charter shall, at the Effective Time, become the charter of such committee of the Surviving Corporation except that the governing law thereof shall be, from and after the Effective Time, the law of Nevada.  Each member of a committee of the board of directors of the Surviving Corporation shall serve in such capacity until his or her successor has been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the applicable committee charter and the Bylaws.

SECTION 3.4.  Corporate Policies. The corporate policies of the Surviving Corporation, including, without limitation, its code of business conduct, corporate governance guidelines, conflict policies and director independence guidelines, effective as of, and immediately following, the Effective Time shall consist of the corporate policies, including, without limitation, the code of business conduct, corporate governance guidelines, conflict policies and director independence guidelines, of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time.

ARTICLE IV
Effect of the Merger on Capital Stock; Certificates

SECTION 4.1.  Effect of Merger on Capital Stock.  At the Effective Time, as a result of the Reincorporation Merger and without any action on the part of the Company, NewCo or the stockholders of the Company:

(a)Each share of common stock, par value $0.01, of the Company (“Company Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than shares canceled pursuant to Section 4.1(d) of this Agreement, shall be converted (without the surrender of stock certificates or any other action by NewCo, the Company or the stockholders of the Company) into one fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.001, of the Surviving Corporation (“Surviving Corporation Common Stock”), and all shares of Company Common Stock shall be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist.

(b)With respect to the number of shares of Company Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans (including all amendments or modifications, collectively, the “Plans”), an equal number of shares of Surviving Corporation Common Stock shall be so reserved.  The Surviving Corporation shall assume the sponsorship of the Plans, the rights and obligations of the Company thereunder, and the rights and obligations of the Company under all award agreements evidencing any award issued under any Plan or any inducement award with respect to Company Common Stock (including all amendments and modifications, collectively, the “Award Agreements”), in each case in accordance with the terms thereof and applicable law.  Each equity-based award with respect to Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time that was granted pursuant to the Plans and the Award Agreements (an “Equity Award”) shall be converted into a corresponding equity-based award with respect to the number of shares of Surviving Corporation Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock underlying such Equity Award at the Effective Time, in accordance with the terms of the applicable Plan and Award Agreement.  Such converted equity-based award shall be subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to the corresponding Equity Award prior to the conversion, including any vesting and forfeiture conditions.  Further, none of the execution of this Agreement, the Reincorporation Merger or other transaction contemplated herein is intended, or shall be deemed, to constitute a “Change in Control” (or term of similar import) under any Plan, Award Agreement, employment agreement or other employee benefit plan of the Company or its affiliates.  The preferred stock purchase rights issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2017, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (as may be amended, the “Rights Agreement”) shall remain outstanding as and be converted into rights to acquire preferred stock of the Surviving Corporation designated pursuant to the Certificate of Designation on the terms and conditions set forth in the Rights Agreement.

A-2




(c)Each share of common stock, par value $0.001, of NewCo registered in the name of the Company shall be reacquired by the Surviving Corporation and canceled and retired, and shall resume the status of authorized and unissued Surviving Corporation Common Stock. No shares of Surviving Corporation Common Stock or other securities of the Surviving Corporation shall be issued in respect thereof.

SECTION 4.2.  Certificates.  At and after the Effective Time, all of the outstanding certificates which immediately prior thereto represented shares of Company Common Stock (other than shares canceled pursuant to Section 4.1(d) of this Agreement), or options, warrants or other securities of the Company shall be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of and to represent a number of shares of Surviving Corporation Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock represented thereby or that were acquirable pursuant to such options, warrants or other securities of the Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, into which the shares of Company Common Stock, or options, warrants or other securities of the Company represented by such certificates shall have been converted as herein provided and shall be so registered on the books and records of the Surviving Corporation or its transfer agent.  The registered owner of any such outstanding certificate shall, until such certificate shall have been surrendered for transfer or otherwise accounted for to the Surviving Corporation or its transfer agent, have and be entitled to exercise any voting and other rights with respect to, and to receive any dividends and other distributions upon, the shares of Surviving Corporation Common Stock or options, warrants or other securities of the Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, evidenced by such outstanding certificate, as above provided.

ARTICLE V
Conditions

SECTION 5.1.  Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.  The respective obligation of each party hereto to effectuate the Reincorporation Merger is subject to satisfaction of the following conditions:

(a)the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock shall have adopted this Agreement in accordance with applicable law and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Company prior to the Effective Time; and

(b)any and all consents, approvals, authorizations or permits, filings or notifications deemed in the sole discretion of the Company to be material to the consummation of the Reincorporation Merger (“Required Consents”) shall have been obtained and shall be in full force and effect, including, without limitation, (i) consents, registrations, approvals, findings of suitability, licenses, declarations, notifications or filings required to be made, given or obtained under applicable laws, rules and regulations in connection with this Agreement or the consummation of the Reincorporation Merger, including, without limitation, applicable gaming laws, rules and regulations including those relating to the manufacture, operation or distribution of gaming equipment, systems, services or products or the conduct of other gaming activities and (ii) supplements, agreements, amendments, conveyances, instruments, consents, approvals, authorizations and other documents to be executed and/or delivered by the Company in connection with any agreements the Company or its affiliates have entered for the provision of debt financing; provided, however, that either of the parties hereto may waive this condition (b), in its sole discretion to the extent permitted by law, with respect to any and all Required Consents.

ARTICLE VI
Termination

SECTION 6.1.  Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated and the Reincorporation Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the adoption of this Agreement by the holders of Company Common Stock referred to in Section 5.1, if the board of directors of the Company determines for any reason that the consummation of the Reincorporation Merger would be inadvisable or not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.  In the event of the termination and abandonment of this Agreement, this Agreement shall become null and void and have no effect, without any liability on the part of either the Company or NewCo, or any of their respective stockholders, directors or officers.

ARTICLE VII
Miscellaneous and General

SECTION 7.1.  Modification or Amendment.  Subject to the provisions of applicable laws, at any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties hereto may modify or amend this Agreement; provided, however, that an amendment made subsequent to the adoption of this Agreement by the holders of Company Common Stock shall not (a) alter or change the amount or kind of shares and/or rights to be received in exchange for or on conversion of all or any of the shares of the Company, (b) alter or change any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation that will become effective immediately following the Reincorporation Merger other than as provided herein or (c) alter or change any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement if such alteration or change would adversely affect the holders of capital stock of either of the parties hereto.

A-3




SECTION 7.2.  Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each such counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts shall together constitute the same agreement.

SECTION 7.3.  Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be deemed to be made in and in all respects shall be interpreted, construed and governed by and in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada, without regard to the conflicts of law principles generally acceptedthereof to the extent that such principles would direct a matter to another jurisdiction.

SECTION 7.4.  Entire Agreement.  This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all other prior agreements, understandings, representations and warranties both written and oral, among the parties, with respect to the subject matter hereof.

SECTION 7.5.  No Third Party Beneficiaries.  This Agreement is not intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder.

SECTION 7.6.  Severability.  The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof.  If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or any circumstance, is determined by any court or other authority of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, (a) a suitable and equitable provision shall be substituted therefor in order to carry out, so far as may be valid and enforceable, the intent and purpose of such invalid or unenforceable provision and (b) the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected by such invalidity or unenforceability, nor shall such invalidity or unenforceability affect the validity or enforceability of such provision, or the application thereof, in any other jurisdiction.

SECTION 7.7.  Headings.  The headings herein are for convenience of reference only, do not constitute part of this Agreement and shall not be deemed to limit or otherwise affect any of the provisions hereof.

[Signature page follows]

A-4




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties hereto as of the date first written above.

Scientific Games Corporation
By:/s/ Michael A. Quartieri
Name:Michael A. Quartieri 
Title:
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary

SG Nevada Merger Company
By:/s/ Michael A. Quartieri 
Name:Michael A. Quartieri 
Title:President, Secretry and Treasurer





[Signature Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]
A-5


Exhibit A

CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
SG NEVADA MERGER COMPANY

Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes 78.390 and 78.403, the undersigned officer of SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation, does hereby certify as follows:

A.The Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2017 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation (the “Merger Agreement”) provides for the amendment and restatement of the corporation’s articles of incorporation as set forth below.

B.The Merger Agreement, and the amendment and restatement of the corporation’s articles of incorporation (including the change of the name of the corporation) contemplated thereby and as set forth below, have been duly approved by the board of directors and the sole stockholder of the corporation, which is sufficient for approval thereof.  The board of directors and sole stockholder have determined and declared such amendment and restatement to be advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the corporation.

C.This certificate sets forth the text of the articles of incorporation of the corporation, as amended and restated in their entirety to this date as follows:

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION

ARTICLE I
NAME

The name of the corporation is Scientific Games Corporation (the “Corporation”).

ARTICLE II
REGISTERED OFFICE

The Corporation may, from time to time, in the manner provided by law, change the registered agent and registered office within the State of Nevada.  The Corporation may also maintain an office or offices for the conduct of its business, either within or without the State of Nevada.

ARTICLE III
PURPOSE

The Corporation is formed for the purpose of engaging in any lawful activity for which corporations may be organized under the laws of the State of Nevada.





ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL STOCK

(A)Authorized Stock.  The total number of shares of all stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 202,000,000 shares, consisting of: (i) 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) 2,000,000 shares, $.001 par value per share, designated as preferred stock (the “Preferred Stock”).  All cross references in each subdivision of this ARTICLE IV refer to other paragraphs in such subdivision unless otherwise indicated.

(B)Preferred Stock.

(1)Designation.  The shares of Preferred Stock are hereby authorized to be issued from time to time in one or more series, the shares of each series to have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as are specified in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”) providing for the issue thereof. Such Preferred Stock may be convertible into, or exchangeable for, at the option of either the holder or the Corporation or upon the happening of a specified event, shares of any other class or classes or any other series of the same or any other class or classes of capital stock of the Corporation at such price or prices or at such rate or rates of exchange and with such adjustments as shall be stated and expressed in these Articles of Incorporation, as amended from time to time (these “Articles of Incorporation”) or in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue thereof.

(2)Authority Vested in the Board.  Authority is hereby expressly vested in the Board of Directors, subject to the provisions of this ARTICLE IV and to the limitations prescribed by law, to authorize the issue from time to time of one or more series of Preferred Stock and, with respect to each such series, to fix by resolution or resolutions adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board of Directors providing for the issue of such series the voting powers, full or limited, if any, of the shares of such series and the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series shall include, but not be limited to, the determination of the following:

(a)The designation of such series.

(b)The dividend rate of such series, the conditions and dates upon which such dividends shall be payable, the relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends payable on any other class or classes or series of the Corporation’s capital stock, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or noncumulative.

(c)Whether the shares of such series shall be subject to redemption by the Corporation at the option of either the Corporation or the holder or both or upon the happening of a specified event and, if made subject to any such redemption, the times or events, prices and other terms and conditions of such redemption.

(d)The terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series.

(e)Whether the shares of such series shall be convertible into, or exchangeable for, at the option of either the holder or the Corporation or upon the happening of a specified event, shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of the Corporation’s capital stock, and, if provision is made for conversion or exchange, the times or events, prices, rates, adjustments and other terms and conditions of such conversions or exchanges.

(f)The restrictions, if any, on the issue or reissue of any additional Preferred Stock.

AA-2


(g)The rights of the holders of the shares of such series upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation.

(h)The provisions as to voting, optional and/or other special rights and preferences, if any.

(3)Certificate.  Before the Corporation shall issue any shares of Preferred Stock of any series, a certificate of designation setting forth a copy of the resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, and establishing the voting powers, if any, and the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, if any, relating to the shares of Preferred Stock of such series, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock of such series authorized by the Board of Directors to be issued, shall be made and signed by an officer of the Corporation and filed in the manner prescribed by the Nevada Revised Statutes, as amended from time to time (the “NRS”).

(C)Common Stock.

(1)Voting Rights. The holders of Common Stock will be entitled to notice of and to attend all meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation and shall be entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by the Corporation’s stockholders.

(2)Dividends. Subject to all provisions of this ARTICLE IV, including the rights of holders of any Preferred Stock having preference as to dividends and except as otherwise provided by these Articles of Incorporation or the NRS, the holders of the Common Stock shall be entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of any funds legally available for such purpose. When and as dividends are declared thereon, whether payable in cash, property or securities of the Corporation, the holders of Common Stock will be entitled to share, ratably according to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them, in such dividends.

(3)Liquidation Rights. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any distribution of any of its assets to any of its stockholders other than by dividends from funds legally available therefor, and other than payments made upon redemptions or purchases of shares of the Corporation, after payment in full of the amount which the holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to receive in such event, the holders of Common Stock shall be entitled to share, ratably according to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them, in the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders.

ARTICLE V
BYLAWS

In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws of the Corporation (as amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”).  Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the Bylaws shall so provide.  Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Nevada, as the Bylaws provide.  The books of the Corporation may be kept (subject to any provision contained in the statutes) outside the State of Nevada at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the Bylaws.

AA-3


ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES

The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in these Articles of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.

ARTICLE VII
INDEMNIFICATION; EXCULPATION

(A)Indemnification.  To the fullest extent permitted under the NRS (including, without limitation, NRS 78.7502, NRS 78.751 and 78.752) and other applicable law, the Corporation shall indemnify directors and officers of the Corporation in their respective capacities as such and in any and all other capacities in which any of them serves at the request of the Corporation.

(B)Limitation on Liability.  The liability of directors and officers of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS.  If the NRS is amended to further eliminate or limit or authorize corporate action to further eliminate or limit the liability of directors or officers, the liability of directors and officers of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS, as so amended from time to time.

(C)Repeal and Conflicts.  Any amendment to or repeal of any provision or section of this ARTICLE VII shall be prospective only, and shall not apply to or have any effect on the right or protection of, or the liability or alleged liability of, any director or officer of the Corporation existing prior to or at the time of such amendment or repeal.  In the event of any conflict between any provision or section of this ARTICLE VII and any other article of the Articles of Incorporation, the terms and provisions of this ARTICLE VII shall control.

ARTICLE VIII
COMPLIANCE WITH GAMING LAWS

To enable the Corporation or any Affiliate (as such term is hereinafter defined) thereof to secure and maintain in good standing all licenses, contracts, franchises, permits,  registrations, findings of suitability, exemptions, waivers and other regulatory approvals related to the ownership, control, conduct or operation of gaming and related activities now or hereafter engaged in by the Corporation or any Affiliate thereof within or without the United States (“GAAP”of America (collectively, “Gaming Licenses). As more fully described, the following provisions shall apply:

(A)All Securities (as hereinafter defined) shall be held subject to all applicable Gaming Laws (as hereinafter defined) and the suitability standards, qualifications and requirements of the Gaming Authorities (as hereinafter defined) that regulate the operation and conduct of the businesses of the Corporation or any Affiliate thereof and in accordance with the requirements of all applicable Gaming Laws. Any person (as hereinafter defined) owning or controlling Securities shall comply with all applicable Gaming Laws.  If any person that holds Securities of the Corporation is determined to be a Disqualified Holder (as hereinafter defined), then, if the Corporation so elects in its sole discretion (unless otherwise required by any Gaming Law or Gaming Authority):

(1)such person shall sell or otherwise dispose of such Securities or other interest in the Executive Compensation section, SGICP EBITDACorporation within the 60-day period commencing on the date the Corporation gives the person notice of such person’s unsuitability or disqualification and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx are measures designedrequiring such disposition (or an earlier time if so required by any Gaming Authority or any Gaming Law) in a manner satisfactory to the Board of Directors in its sole discretion; or

(2)the Corporation may redeem any or all such Securities of the Corporation on the date specified in the notice given by the Compensation CommitteeCorporation to establishsuch person, which date may not be less than 30 days after notice is given, at a price equal to the Redemption Price (as hereinafter defined).

(B)Notice to a Disqualified Holder under paragraph (A)(1) or (2) of this ARTICLE VIII shall be delivered in writing by personal delivery, mailing it to the address shown on the Corporation’s books and calculate our SGICP targets. records or any other reasonable means and shall be deemed effective on the date given (the “Notice Date”). Failure of the Corporation to provide such notice to a Disqualified Holder after making reasonable efforts to do so shall not preclude the Corporation from exercising its rights under this Article.

AA-4


(C)If the Corporation intends to redeem Securities in accordance with paragraph (A)(2) of this ARTICLE VIII, the notice shall specify the Securities to be redeemed, the date, time and place when such redemption will be consummated, which date in no event will be earlier than 30 days after the date of such notice, and the Redemption Price (it being sufficient for the purposes of this ARTICLE VIII for the Corporation to indicate generally that the Redemption Price will be determined in accordance with paragraphs (C) and (M) hereof). If the Corporation gives the notice provided for by the preceding sentence, such notice shall be deemed to constitute a binding agreement on the part of the Corporation to redeem, and on the part of the person notified to sell, the Securities referred to in such Notice in accordance with this ARTICLE VIII.

(D)The following table provides reconciliationsoperation of SGICP EBITDAthis ARTICLE VIII shall not be stayed by an appeal from a determination of any Gaming Authority.

(E)Commencing on the Notice Date (or such earlier date on which any Gaming Authority serves notice of its determination of unsuitability or disqualification of the Disqualified Holder on the Corporation), the Disqualified Holder shall not be entitled to receive payments of dividends or interest upon any Securities of the Corporation held by such Disqualified Holder, or exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting or other rights conferred by the Corporation’s Securities upon the holders thereof.

(F)The Board of Directors shall have the power to determine, on the basis of information known to the Board after reasonable inquiry, all questions arising under this ARTICLE VIII, including, without limitation (1) whether a person is a Disqualified Holder, (2) whether a Disqualified Holder has disposed of Securities pursuant to paragraph (A) of this ARTICLE VIII and SGICP EBITDA minus CapEx, non-GAAP(3) the amount of Securities held directly or indirectly by any person. Any such determination shall be binding and conclusive on all such persons.

(G)The Corporation shall be entitled to injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII, and each holder of Securities of the Corporation shall be deemed to have acknowledged by acquiring or retaining Securities of the Corporation that failure to comply with this ARTICLE VIII will expose the Corporation to irreparable injury for which there is no adequate remedy at law and that the Corporation is entitled to injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII.

(H)A Disqualified Holder shall indemnify the Corporation and its Affiliates for any and all direct or indirect costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Corporation or any of its Affiliates as a result of such person’s continuing ownership of, or failure to divest, the Securities.

(I)Any person to whom a redemption notice is given pursuant to the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII shall have the burden of establishing to the satisfaction of the Corporation the dates on which and the Purchase Price at which such person acquired the Securities subject to such notice.

(J)The right of the Corporation to redeem Securities pursuant to this ARTICLE VIII shall not be exclusive of any other rights the Corporation or any of its Affiliates may have or hereafter acquire under any agreement, provision of the bylaws of the Corporation or such Affiliate or otherwise. Nothing in this ARTICLE VIII shall be construed to:  (i) relieve any Disqualified Holder (or any Affiliate thereof) from any fiduciary obligation imposed by law, (ii) prohibit or affect any contractual arrangement which the Corporation may make from time to time with any holder of Securities to purchase all or any part of any other securities held by such holder or (iii) be in derogation of any action, past or future, which has been or may be taken by the Board of Directors or any holder of Securities with respect to the subject matter of this ARTICLE VIII.

(K)Nothing contained in this ARTICLE VIII shall limit the authority of the Board of Directors to take such other action, to the extent not prohibited by law, as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the Corporation or any of its Affiliates from the denial or loss or threatened denial or loss of any Gaming License.

(L)If any provision of this ARTICLE VIII or the application of any such provision to any person or under any circumstance shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this ARTICLE VIII.  Except as may be required by any applicable Gaming Law or Gaming Authority, the Board of Directors may waive any of the rights of the Corporation or any restrictions contained in this ARTICLE VIII in any instance in which and to the extent the Board of Directors determines that a waiver would be in the best interests of the Corporation. Except as required by a Gaming Authority, nothing in this ARTICLE VIII shall be deemed or construed to require the Corporation to redeem or repurchase any Securities owned or controlled by a Disqualified Holder or any Affiliate thereof.

AA-5



(M)For the purposes of this ARTICLE VIII:

(1)Affiliate” means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified (including any direct or indirect subsidiary of such person).  For purposes of this definition, “control” (including, with correlative meanings, the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as used with respect to a person, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise.  For purposes of this ARTICLE VIII, the term “Affiliate” shall also include any joint venture, minority-owned entity or other enterprise in which the Corporation or any of its Affiliates has any direct or indirect interest.

(2)Disqualified Holder” means any record or beneficial holder of the Corporation’s Securities: (i) who is requested or required pursuant to any Gaming Law to appear before, or submit to the jurisdiction of, or file an application with, or provide information to, any Gaming Authority and either refuses to do so or otherwise fails to comply with such request or requirement within a reasonable period of time, (ii) who has withdrawn or requested the withdrawal of a pending application for any Gaming License from any Gaming Authority in anticipation of such person being denied such Gaming License or receiving such Gaming License subject to materially burdensome or unacceptable terms or conditions, (iii) who is determined or shall have been determined by any Gaming Authority not to be suitable or qualified with respect to owning or controlling Securities or securities of an Affiliate of the Corporation, or (iv) whose ownership or control of Securities may result, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, in the failure of the Corporation or any of its Affiliates to obtain, maintain, retain, renew or qualify for a Gaming License, or cause or otherwise result in the imposition of any materially burdensome or unacceptable terms or conditions on any Gaming License.

(3)Gaming Authority” means any government, court, or federal, state, provincial, local, international, tribal or foreign governmental, administrative or regulatory or licensing body, agency, authority or official, which regulates or has authority over, including, without limitation, the right to issue or grant a license, contract, franchise, permit, registration, finding of suitability, exemption, waiver or other regulatory approval, any form of gaming or related activities conducted or proposed to be conducted by the Corporation or any of its Affiliates in any jurisdiction, including, without limitation, lottery, pari mutuel wagering, sports wagering and video gaming activities.

(4)Gaming Law” means any federal, state, provincial, local,  international, tribal or foreign law, statute, order, rule, regulation, decree, ordinance or interpretation pursuant to which any Gaming Authority possesses or asserts regulatory or licensing authority over the ownership, operation, management or conduct of gaming and related activities.

(5)person” means any individual, partnership, firm, corporation, limited liability company, trust or other entity.

(6)Purchase Price” means the price paid to acquire a Security, exclusive of commissions, taxes and other fees and expenses, adjusted for any stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares or similar event.

(7)Redemption Price” means, with respect to any Securities, the price equal to the lesser of  (1) the average closing sale price of such Securities as reported for composite transactions in securities listed on the  principal trading market on which such Securities are then listed or admitted for trading during the 30 trading days preceding the Notice Date, or, if such Securities are not so listed or traded, the fair value of the Securities as determined by the Board of Directors in good faith and in consideration of such records of the Corporation and information, opinions, reports or statements presented to the Board of Directors by any of the Corporation’s officers, employees or financial measures,advisors, or committees of the Board of Directors (including, without limitation, information, opinions, reports or statements regarding any discount for lack of marketability or otherwise), as the Board of Directors deems, in its sole discretion, to net loss.be relevant and pertinent to such determination, and (2) the original Purchase Price.
For additional details regarding
AA-6


(8)Securities” means any shares of capital stock, bonds, notes, convertible debentures, warrants or other instruments that represent a share in the reported GAAP financial measures, seeequity of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-KCorporation, a debt owed by the Corporation or the right to acquire any of the foregoing.

ARTICLE IX
SPECIAL PROVISIONS REGARDING DISTRIBUTIONS

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws, the Corporation is hereby specifically allowed to make any distribution that otherwise would be prohibited by NRS 78.288(2)(b).

***            *

AA-7




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed this Certificate of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Scientific Games Corporation as of ___________, 20__.



Name:
Title:



AA-8

Exhibit B

ATTACHMENT “A” TO CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION


CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION

of

SERIES A JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK

of

SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION

(Pursuant to Section 78.1955 of the Nevada Revised Statutes)

Scientific Games Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada (the “Corporation”), in accordance with the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 78.195 and 78.1955, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

That pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”) in accordance with the provisions of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as filed with the SECSecretary of State of the State of Nevada on March 2, 2017.
Reconciliation of SGICP EBITDA and SGICP EBITDA Minus CapEx to Net Loss
(in millions)
 Twelve Month Ended December 31, 2016
 Gaming Lottery Other Consolidated
Operating income (loss)$212.0
 $122.9
 $(204.3) $130.6
Other (expense) income       
Interest expense      $(661.4)
Earnings from equity investments4.7
 8.3
 
 13.0
Gain on early extinguishment of debt    25.2
 25.2
Other income, net    13.9
 13.9
Total other expense, net      $(609.3)
        
Net loss before income taxes      (478.7)
Income tax benefit      125.0
Net loss      $(353.7)
        
Goodwill impairment
 69.0
   69.0
Depreciation, amortization and impairments585.2
 66.5
   738.7
Interest expense      661.4
Interest income9.9
      
Income tax benefit      (125.0)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt      (25.2)
Compensation Committee adjustments(16.5) 2.1
   (9.0)
SGICP EBITDA$795.3
 $268.8
   $956.2
        
Capital expenditures(1)
(184.4) (40.5)   (272.9)
Compensation Committee adjustments13.6
      
SGICP EBITDA less CapEx$624.5
 $228.3
   $683.3
_______, 201_ (as heretofore amended and as may be amended and/or restated from time to time, the “Articles of Incorporation”), the Board of Directors adopted the following resolution creating a series of 20,000 shares of preferred stock of the Corporation designated as “Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock”:

(1)For additional information on capital expenditures, see Note 2 in the Company's 2016 Form 10-K filed on March 3, 2017.
RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Directors by the Articles of Incorporation and by the provisions of NRS 78.195 and 78.1955, the Board of Directors hereby establishes a series of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Corporation and hereby sets forth the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, of such series of preferred stock and the number of shares of such series (in addition to any provisions set forth in the Articles of Incorporation applicable to the preferred stock of all series), as set forth as follows:

Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

1.Designation and Amount.  There shall be a series of preferred stock, par value $1.00, of the Corporation (the “Preferred Stock”) that shall be designated as “Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock,” and the number of shares constituting such series shall be 20,000.  Such number of shares may be increased or decreased by resolution of the Board of Directors; provided, however, that no decrease shall reduce the number of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock to less than the number of shares then issued and outstanding plus the number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding rights, options or warrants or upon conversion of outstanding securities issued by the Corporation.

2.Dividends and Distributions.

(i)  Subject to the prior and superior rights of the holders of any shares of any class or series of stock of the Corporation ranking prior and superior to the shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, the holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, in preference to the holders of shares of any class or series of stock of the Corporation ranking junior to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in respect thereof, shall be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the purpose, quarterly dividends payable in cash on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year (each such date being referred to herein as a “Quarterly Dividend Payment Date”), commencing on the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date after the first issuance of a share or fraction of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, in an amount per share (rounded to the nearest cent) equal to the greater of (a) $10.00 and (b) the sum of (1) the Adjustment Number (as defined below) times the aggregate per share amount of all cash dividends plus (2) the Adjustment Number times the aggregate per share amount (payable in kind) of all non-cash dividends or other distributions other than a dividend payable in shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Corporation (the “Common Stock”), or a subdivision of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (by reclassification or otherwise), in each case declared on the Common Stock since the immediately preceding Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, or, with respect to the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, since the first issuance of any share or fraction of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.  The “Adjustment Number” shall initially be 10,000.  In the event the Corporation shall at any time after _______, 201_ (i) declare and pay any dividend on Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock, (ii) subdivide the outstanding Common Stock or (iii) combine the outstanding Common Stock into a smaller number of shares, then in each such case the Adjustment Number in effect immediately prior to such event shall be adjusted by multiplying such Adjustment Number by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.




(ii)  The Corporation shall declare a dividend or distribution on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock as provided in paragraph (A) above immediately after it declares a dividend or distribution on the Common Stock (other than a dividend payable in shares of Common Stock).

(iii)  Dividends shall begin to accrue and be cumulative on outstanding shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock from the Quarterly Dividend Payment Date next preceding the date of issue of such shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, unless the date of issue of such shares is prior to the record date for the first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date; in which case dividends on such shares shall begin to accrue from the date of issue of such shares, or unless the date of issue is a Quarterly Dividend Payment Date or is a date after the record date for the determination of holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock entitled to receive a quarterly dividend and before such Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, in either of which events such dividends shall begin to accrue and be cumulative from such Quarterly Dividend Payment Date.  Accrued but unpaid dividends shall not bear interest.  Dividends paid on the shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in an amount less than the total amount of such dividends at the time accrued and payable on such shares shall be allocated pro rata on a share-by-share basis among all such shares at the time outstanding.  The Board of Directors may fix a record date for the determination of holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock entitled to receive payment of a dividend or distribution declared thereon, which record date shall be no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date fixed for the payment thereof.

3.Voting Rights.  The holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall have the following voting rights:

(i)  Each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to a number of votes equal to the Adjustment Number on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Corporation.  Except as otherwise provided herein, in another certificate of designation authorizing a series of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Corporation or as required by law, the holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and the holders of shares of Common Stock and any other capital stock of the Corporation having general voting rights shall vote together as one class on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Corporation.

(ii)  Except as required by law, by the Articles of Incorporation and by Section 10 hereof, holders of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall have no special voting rights and their consent shall not be required (except to the extent they are entitled to vote with holders of Common Stock as set forth herein) for taking any corporate action.

4.Certain Restrictions. Whenever quarterly dividends or other dividends or distributions payable on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock as provided in Section 2 are in arrears, thereafter and until all accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions, whether or not declared, on shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock outstanding shall have been paid in full, the Corporation shall not:

(i)  declare or pay dividends on, make any other distributions on, or redeem or purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of stock ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock other than (A) such redemptions or purchases that may be deemed to occur upon the exercise of stock options, warrants or similar rights or grant, vesting or lapse of restrictions on the grant of any other performance shares, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other equity awards to the extent that such shares represent all or a portion of (x) the exercise or purchase price of such options, warrants or similar rights or other equity awards and (y) the amount of withholding taxes owed by the recipient of such award in respect of such grant, exercise, vesting or lapse of restrictions; (B) the repurchase, redemption, or other acquisition or retirement for value of any such shares from employees, former employees, directors, former directors, consultants or former consultants of the Corporation or their respective estate, spouse, former spouse or family member, pursuant to the terms of the agreements pursuant to which such shares were acquired;


AB-2


(ii)  declare or pay dividends on or make any other distributions on any shares of stock ranking on a parity (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) with the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, except dividends paid ratably on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and all such parity stock on which dividends are payable or in arrears in proportion to the total amounts to which the holders of all such shares are then entitled; or

(iii)  purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, or any shares of stock ranking on a parity with the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, except in accordance with a purchase offer made in writing or by publication (as determined by the Board of Directors) to all holders of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, or to such holders and holders of any such shares ranking on a parity therewith, upon such terms as the Board of Directors, after consideration of the respective annual dividend rates and other relative rights and preferences of the respective series and classes, shall determine will result in fair and equitable treatment among the respective series or classes.

(iv)  The Corporation shall not permit any subsidiary of the Corporation to purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any shares of stock of the Corporation unless the Corporation could, under paragraph (A) of this Section 4, purchase or otherwise acquire such shares at such time and in such manner.

5.Reacquired Shares.  Any shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock purchased or otherwise acquired by the Corporation in any manner whatsoever shall be retired promptly after the acquisition thereof.  All such shares shall upon their retirement become authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock and may be reissued as part of a new series of Preferred Stock to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, subject to any conditions and restrictions on issuance set forth herein.

6.Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up.  (A)  Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, voluntary or otherwise, no distribution shall be made to the holders of shares of stock ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock unless, prior thereto, the holders of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall have received an amount per share (the “Series A Liquidation Preference”) equal to the greater of (i) $10.00 plus an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions thereon, whether or not declared, to the date of such payment, and (ii) the Adjustment Number times the per share amount of all cash and other property to be distributed in respect of the Common Stock upon such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation.

(i)  In the event, however, that there are not sufficient assets available to permit payment in full of the Series A Liquidation Preference and the liquidation preferences of all other classes and series of stock of the Corporation, if any, that rank on a parity with the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in respect thereof, then the assets available for such distribution shall be distributed ratably to the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and the holders of such parity shares in proportion to their respective liquidation preferences.

(ii)  Neither the merger or consolidation of the Corporation into or with another entity nor the merger or consolidation of any other entity into or with the Corporation shall be deemed to be a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation within the meaning of this Section 6.

7.Consolidation, Merger, Etc.  In case the Corporation shall enter into any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which the outstanding shares of Common Stock are exchanged for or changed into other stock or securities, cash and/or any other property, then in any such case each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall at the same time be similarly exchanged or changed in an amount per share equal to the Adjustment Number times the aggregate amount of stock, securities, cash and/or any other property (payable in kind), as the case may be, into which or for which each share of Common Stock is changed or exchanged.


AB-3


8.No Redemption.  Shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall not be subject to redemption by the Corporation.

9.Ranking.  The Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall rank junior to all series of Preferred Stock , as to the payment of dividends and as to the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, unless, in the case of any other series of Preferred Stock, the terms of any such series shall provide otherwise, and shall rank senior to the Common Stock as to such matters.

10.Amendment.  At any time that any shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Articles of Incorporation shall not be amended, by merger, consolidation or otherwise, which would materially alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock so as to affect them adversely without the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class.

11.Fractional Shares.  Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock may be issued in fractions of a share that shall entitle the holder, in proportion to such holder’s fractional shares, to exercise voting rights, receive dividends, participate in distributions and to have the benefit of all other rights of holders of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.


AB-4


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Designation this ___ day of ___________, 201_.
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
    
By:
Name:
Title:
    


AB-5




ANNEX B

CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
SG NEVADA MERGER COMPANY

Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes 78.390 and 78.403, the undersigned officer of SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation, does hereby certify as follows:

A.The Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 18, 2017 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and SG Nevada Merger Company, a Nevada corporation (the “Merger Agreement”) provides for the amendment and restatement of the corporation’s articles of incorporation as set forth below.

B.The Merger Agreement, and the amendment and restatement of the corporation’s articles of incorporation (including the change of the name of the corporation) contemplated thereby and as set forth below, have been duly approved by the board of directors and the sole stockholder of the corporation, which is sufficient for approval thereof.  The board of directors and sole stockholder have determined and declared such amendment and restatement to be advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the corporation.

C.This certificate sets forth the text of the articles of incorporation of the corporation, as amended and restated in their entirety to this date as follows:

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION

ARTICLE I
NAME

The name of the corporation is Scientific Games Corporation (the “Corporation”).

ARTICLE II
REGISTERED OFFICE

The Corporation may, from time to time, in the manner provided by law, change the registered agent and registered office within the State of Nevada.  The Corporation may also maintain an office or offices for the conduct of its business, either within or without the State of Nevada.

ARTICLE III
PURPOSE

The Corporation is formed for the purpose of engaging in any lawful activity for which corporations may be organized under the laws of the State of Nevada.

ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL STOCK

(A)Authorized Stock.  The total number of shares of all stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 202,000,000 shares, consisting of: (i) 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) 2,000,000 shares, $.001 par value per share, designated as preferred stock (the “Preferred Stock”).  All cross references in each subdivision of this ARTICLE IV refer to other paragraphs in such subdivision unless otherwise indicated.

(B)Preferred Stock.

(1)Designation.  The shares of Preferred Stock are hereby authorized to be issued from time to time in one or more series, the shares of each series to have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as are specified in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”) providing for the issue thereof. Such Preferred Stock may be convertible into, or exchangeable for, at the option of either the holder or the Corporation or upon the happening of a specified event, shares of any other class or classes or any other series of the same or any other class or classes of capital stock of the Corporation at such price or prices or at such rate or rates of exchange and with such adjustments as shall be stated and expressed in these Articles of Incorporation, as amended from time to time (these “Articles of Incorporation”) or in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue thereof.




(2)Authority Vested in the Board.  Authority is hereby expressly vested in the Board of Directors, subject to the provisions of this ARTICLE IV and to the limitations prescribed by law, to authorize the issue from time to time of one or more series of Preferred Stock and, with respect to each such series, to fix by resolution or resolutions adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board of Directors providing for the issue of such series the voting powers, full or limited, if any, of the shares of such series and the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each series shall include, but not be limited to, the determination of the following:

(a)The designation of such series.

(b)The dividend rate of such series, the conditions and dates upon which such dividends shall be payable, the relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends payable on any other class or classes or series of the Corporation’s capital stock, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or noncumulative.

(c)Whether the shares of such series shall be subject to redemption by the Corporation at the option of either the Corporation or the holder or both or upon the happening of a specified event and, if made subject to any such redemption, the times or events, prices and other terms and conditions of such redemption.

(d)The terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series.

(e)Whether the shares of such series shall be convertible into, or exchangeable for, at the option of either the holder or the Corporation or upon the happening of a specified event, shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of the Corporation’s capital stock, and, if provision is made for conversion or exchange, the times or events, prices, rates, adjustments and other terms and conditions of such conversions or exchanges.

(f)The restrictions, if any, on the issue or reissue of any additional Preferred Stock.

(g)The rights of the holders of the shares of such series upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation.

(h)The provisions as to voting, optional and/or other special rights and preferences, if any.

(3)Certificate.  Before the Corporation shall issue any shares of Preferred Stock of any series, a certificate of designation setting forth a copy of the resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, and establishing the voting powers, if any, and the designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, if any, relating to the shares of Preferred Stock of such series, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock of such series authorized by the Board of Directors to be issued, shall be made and signed by an officer of the Corporation and filed in the manner prescribed by the Nevada Revised Statutes, as amended from time to time (the “NRS”).

(C)Common Stock.

(1)Voting Rights. The holders of Common Stock will be entitled to notice of and to attend all meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation and shall be entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by the Corporation’s stockholders.

(2)Dividends. Subject to all provisions of this ARTICLE IV, including the rights of holders of any Preferred Stock having preference as to dividends and except as otherwise provided by these Articles of Incorporation or the NRS, the holders of the Common Stock shall be entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of any funds legally available for such purpose. When and as dividends are declared thereon, whether payable in cash, property or securities of the Corporation, the holders of Common Stock will be entitled to share, ratably according to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them, in such dividends.

B-2




(3)Liquidation Rights. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any distribution of any of its assets to any of its stockholders other than by dividends from funds legally available therefor, and other than payments made upon redemptions or purchases of shares of the Corporation, after payment in full of the amount which the holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to receive in such event, the holders of Common Stock shall be entitled to share, ratably according to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them, in the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders.

ARTICLE V
BYLAWS

In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws of the Corporation (as amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”).  Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the Bylaws shall so provide.  Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Nevada, as the Bylaws provide.  The books of the Corporation may be kept (subject to any provision contained in the statutes) outside the State of Nevada at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the Bylaws.

ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES

The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in these Articles of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.

ARTICLE VII
INDEMNIFICATION; EXCULPATION

(A)Indemnification.  To the fullest extent permitted under the NRS (including, without limitation, NRS 78.7502, NRS 78.751 and 78.752) and other applicable law, the Corporation shall indemnify directors and officers of the Corporation in their respective capacities as such and in any and all other capacities in which any of them serves at the request of the Corporation.

 (B)Limitation on Liability.  The liability of directors and officers of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS.  If the NRS is amended to further eliminate or limit or authorize corporate action to further eliminate or limit the liability of directors or officers, the liability of directors and officers of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS, as so amended from time to time.

(C)Repeal and Conflicts.  Any amendment to or repeal of any provision or section of this ARTICLE VII shall be prospective only, and shall not apply to or have any effect on the right or protection of, or the liability or alleged liability of, any director or officer of the Corporation existing prior to or at the time of such amendment or repeal.  In the event of any conflict between any provision or section of this ARTICLE VII and any other article of the Articles of Incorporation, the terms and provisions of this ARTICLE VII shall control.

ARTICLE VIII
COMPLIANCE WITH GAMING LAWS

To enable the Corporation or any Affiliate (as such term is hereinafter defined) thereof to secure and maintain in good standing all licenses, contracts, franchises, permits,  registrations, findings of suitability, exemptions, waivers and other regulatory approvals related to the ownership, control, conduct or operation of gaming and related activities now or hereafter engaged in by the Corporation or any Affiliate thereof within or without the United States of America (collectively, “Gaming Licenses”), the following provisions shall apply:

(A)All Securities (as hereinafter defined) shall be held subject to all applicable Gaming Laws (as hereinafter defined) and the suitability standards, qualifications and requirements of the Gaming Authorities (as hereinafter defined) that regulate the operation and conduct of the businesses of the Corporation or any Affiliate thereof and in accordance with the requirements of all applicable Gaming Laws. Any person (as hereinafter defined) owning or controlling Securities shall comply with all applicable Gaming Laws.  If any person that holds Securities of the Corporation is determined to be a Disqualified Holder (as hereinafter defined), then, if the Corporation so elects in its sole discretion (unless otherwise required by any Gaming Law or Gaming Authority):
B-3


(1)such person shall sell or otherwise dispose of such Securities or other interest in the Corporation within the 60-day period commencing on the date the Corporation gives the person notice of such person’s unsuitability or disqualification and requiring such disposition (or an earlier time if so required by any Gaming Authority or any Gaming Law) in a manner satisfactory to the Board of Directors in its sole discretion; or

(2)the Corporation may redeem any or all such Securities of the Corporation on the date specified in the notice given by the Corporation to such person, which date may not be less than 30 days after notice is given, at a price equal to the Redemption Price (as hereinafter defined).

(B)Notice to a Disqualified Holder under paragraph (A)(1) or (2) of this ARTICLE VIII shall be delivered in writing by personal delivery, mailing it to the address shown on the Corporation’s books and records or any other reasonable means and shall be deemed effective on the date given (the “Notice Date”). Failure of the Corporation to provide such notice to a Disqualified Holder after making reasonable efforts to do so shall not preclude the Corporation from exercising its rights under this Article.

(C)If the Corporation intends to redeem Securities in accordance with paragraph (A)(2) of this ARTICLE VIII, the notice shall specify the Securities to be redeemed, the date, time and place when such redemption will be consummated, which date in no event will be earlier than 30 days after the date of such notice, and the Redemption Price (it being sufficient for the purposes of this ARTICLE VIII for the Corporation to indicate generally that the Redemption Price will be determined in accordance with paragraphs (C) and (M) hereof). If the Corporation gives the notice provided for by the preceding sentence, such notice shall be deemed to constitute a binding agreement on the part of the Corporation to redeem, and on the part of the person notified to sell, the Securities referred to in such Notice in accordance with this ARTICLE VIII.

(D)The operation of this ARTICLE VIII shall not be stayed by an appeal from a determination of any Gaming Authority.

(E)Commencing on the Notice Date (or such earlier date on which any Gaming Authority serves notice of its determination of unsuitability or disqualification of the Disqualified Holder on the Corporation), the Disqualified Holder shall not be entitled to receive payments of dividends or interest upon any Securities of the Corporation held by such Disqualified Holder, or exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting or other rights conferred by the Corporation’s Securities upon the holders thereof.

(F)The Board of Directors shall have the power to determine, on the basis of information known to the Board after reasonable inquiry, all questions arising under this ARTICLE VIII, including, without limitation (1) whether a person is a Disqualified Holder, (2) whether a Disqualified Holder has disposed of Securities pursuant to paragraph (A) of this ARTICLE VIII and (3) the amount of Securities held directly or indirectly by any person. Any such determination shall be binding and conclusive on all such persons.

(G)The Corporation shall be entitled to injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII, and each holder of Securities of the Corporation shall be deemed to have acknowledged by acquiring or retaining Securities of the Corporation that failure to comply with this ARTICLE VIII will expose the Corporation to irreparable injury for which there is no adequate remedy at law and that the Corporation is entitled to injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII.

(H)A Disqualified Holder shall indemnify the Corporation and its Affiliates for any and all direct or indirect costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Corporation or any of its Affiliates as a result of such person’s continuing ownership of, or failure to divest, the Securities.

(I)Any person to whom a redemption notice is given pursuant to the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII shall have the burden of establishing to the satisfaction of the Corporation the dates on which and the Purchase Price at which such person acquired the Securities subject to such notice.

(J)The right of the Corporation to redeem Securities pursuant to this ARTICLE VIII shall not be exclusive of any other rights the Corporation or any of its Affiliates may have or hereafter acquire under any agreement, provision of the bylaws of the Corporation or such Affiliate or otherwise. Nothing in this ARTICLE VIII shall be construed to:  (i) relieve any Disqualified Holder (or any Affiliate thereof) from any fiduciary obligation imposed by law, (ii) prohibit or affect any contractual arrangement which the Corporation may make from time to time with any holder of Securities to purchase all or any part of any other securities held by such holder or (iii) be in derogation of any action, past or future, which has been or may be taken by the Board of Directors or any holder of Securities with respect to the subject matter of this ARTICLE VIII.

B-4



(K)Nothing contained in this ARTICLE VIII shall limit the authority of the Board of Directors to take such other action, to the extent not prohibited by law, as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the Corporation or any of its Affiliates from the denial or loss or threatened denial or loss of any Gaming License.

(L)If any provision of this ARTICLE VIII or the application of any such provision to any person or under any circumstance shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this ARTICLE VIII.  Except as may be required by any applicable Gaming Law or Gaming Authority, the Board of Directors may waive any of the rights of the Corporation or any restrictions contained in this ARTICLE VIII in any instance in which and to the extent the Board of Directors determines that a waiver would be in the best interests of the Corporation. Except as required by a Gaming Authority, nothing in this ARTICLE VIII shall be deemed or construed to require the Corporation to redeem or repurchase any Securities owned or controlled by a Disqualified Holder or any Affiliate thereof.

(M)For the purposes of this ARTICLE VIII:

(1)Affiliate” means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified (including any direct or indirect subsidiary of such person).  For purposes of this definition, “control” (including, with correlative meanings, the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as used with respect to a person, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise.  For purposes of this ARTICLE VIII, the term “Affiliate” shall also include any joint venture, minority-owned entity or other enterprise in which the Corporation or any of its Affiliates has any direct or indirect interest.

(2)Disqualified Holder” means any record or beneficial holder of the Corporation’s Securities: (i) who is requested or required pursuant to any Gaming Law to appear before, or submit to the jurisdiction of, or file an application with, or provide information to, any Gaming Authority and either refuses to do so or otherwise fails to comply with such request or requirement within a reasonable period of time, (ii) who has withdrawn or requested the withdrawal of a pending application for any Gaming License from any Gaming Authority in anticipation of such person being denied such Gaming License or receiving such Gaming License subject to materially burdensome or unacceptable terms or conditions, (iii) who is determined or shall have been determined by any Gaming Authority not to be suitable or qualified with respect to owning or controlling Securities or securities of an Affiliate of the Corporation, or (iv) whose ownership or control of Securities may result, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, in the failure of the Corporation or any of its Affiliates to obtain, maintain, retain, renew or qualify for a Gaming License, or cause or otherwise result in the imposition of any materially burdensome or unacceptable terms or conditions on any Gaming License.

(3)Gaming Authority” means any government, court, or federal, state, provincial, local, international, tribal or foreign governmental, administrative or regulatory or licensing body, agency, authority or official, which regulates or has authority over, including, without limitation, the right to issue or grant a license, contract, franchise, permit, registration, finding of suitability, exemption, waiver or other regulatory approval, any form of gaming or related activities conducted or proposed to be conducted by the Corporation or any of its Affiliates in any jurisdiction, including, without limitation, lottery, pari mutuel wagering, sports wagering and video gaming activities.

(4)Gaming Law” means any federal, state, provincial, local,  international, tribal or foreign law, statute, order, rule, regulation, decree, ordinance or interpretation pursuant to which any Gaming Authority possesses or asserts regulatory or licensing authority over the ownership, operation, management or conduct of gaming and related activities.

(5)person” means any individual, partnership, firm, corporation, limited liability company, trust or other entity.


B-5




(6)Purchase Price” means the price paid to acquire a Security, exclusive of commissions, taxes and other fees and expenses, adjusted for any stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares or similar event.

(7)Redemption Price” means, with respect to any Securities, the price equal to the lesser of  (1) the average closing sale price of such Securities as reported for composite transactions in securities listed on the  principal trading market on which such Securities are then listed or admitted for trading during the 30 trading days preceding the Notice Date, or, if such Securities are not so listed or traded, the fair value of the Securities as determined by the Board of Directors in good faith and in consideration of such records of the Corporation and information, opinions, reports or statements presented to the Board of Directors by any of the Corporation’s officers, employees or financial advisors, or committees of the Board of Directors (including, without limitation, information, opinions, reports or statements regarding any discount for lack of marketability or otherwise), as the Board of Directors deems, in its sole discretion, to be relevant and pertinent to such determination, and (2) the original Purchase Price.

(8)Securities” means any shares of capital stock, bonds, notes, convertible debentures, warrants or other instruments that represent a share in the equity of the Corporation, a debt owed by the Corporation or the right to acquire any of the foregoing.
ARTICLE IX
SPECIAL PROVISIONS REGARDING DISTRIBUTIONS

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws, the Corporation is hereby specifically allowed to make any distribution that otherwise would be prohibited by NRS 78.288(2)(b).

***            *

B-6


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed this Certificate of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Scientific Games Corporation as of ___________, 20__.


Name:
Title:


B-7




ANNEX C

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION

ARTICLE I
Offices, Corporate Seal
Section 1.01     Offices.  Scientific Games Corporation (the “Corporation”) shall have a registered office, a principal office and such other offices as the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”) may determine.

Section 1.02     Corporate Seal.  There shall be no corporate seal.

ARTICLE II
Meetings of Stockholders

Section 2.01     Place and Time of Meetings.  Meetings of the stockholders may be held at such place, on such date and at such time as may be designated by the Board of Directors.

Section 2.02     Annual Meetings.  The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be held at such place, on such date and at such time as designated by the Board of Directors.  The purpose of this meeting shall be for the election of directors and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting.  Except as otherwise restricted by the articles of incorporation of the Corporation (as amended or amended and restated from time to time, the “Articles of Incorporation”) or applicable law, the Board of Directors may postpone, reschedule or cancel any annual meeting of stockholders.

Section 2.03     Special Meetings.  Special meetings of the stockholders for any purpose or purposes shall be called by the Secretary at the written request of a majority of the total number of directors, by the Chairman of the Board, by the President or by the stockholders owning a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote.  Such request shall state the purpose or purposes of the proposed meeting.  Business transacted at any special meeting shall be limited to the purposes stated in the notice.  Except as otherwise restricted by the Articles of Incorporation or applicable law, the Board of Directors may postpone, reschedule or cancel any special meeting of stockholders.

Section 2.04     Quorum; Adjourned Meetings.  The holders of a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote present in person or by proxy (regardless of whether the proxy has authority to vote on all matters) shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any annual or special meeting.  If a quorum is not present at a meeting, those present shall adjourn to such day as they shall agree upon by majority vote.  Notice of any adjourned meeting need not be given if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken.  However, if a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record as of the new record date.  At adjourned meetings at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally noticed.  If a quorum is present, the stockholders may continue to transact business until adjournment notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough stockholders to leave less than a quorum.

Section 2.05     Organization.  At each meeting of the stockholders, the Chairman of the Board or in his or her absence the President or in his or her absence the chairman chosen by a majority of the voting power of the stockholders present in person or proxy shall act as chairman; and the Secretary of the Corporation, or in his or her absence an Assistant Secretary, or in his or her absence any person whom the chairman of the meeting shall appoint, shall act as secretary of the meeting.

Section 2.06     Voting.  Each stockholder of the Corporation entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each share of stock having voting rights held by such stockholder and registered in his, her or its name on the books of the Corporation.  Upon the request of any stockholder present in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders and entitled to vote at such meeting, or if directed by the chairman of the meeting in his or her discretion, the vote on any question before a meeting or the election of directors shall be by written ballot.  All questions at a meeting shall be decided by a majority vote of the number of shares entitled to vote represented at the meeting at the time of the vote except where otherwise required by statute, the Articles of Incorporation or these Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended or amended and restated from time to time, the “Bylaws”).  For the election of directors, the persons receiving the largest number of votes cast (up to and including the number of directors to be elected) shall be directors.





Section 2.07     Inspectors of Election.  At each meeting of the stockholders, the chairman of such meeting may appoint two inspectors of election.  Each inspector of election so appointed shall first subscribe an oath or affirmation to execute the duties of an inspector of election at such meeting with strict impartiality and according to the best of his or her ability.  Such inspectors of election, if any, may (a) ascertain the number of shares outstanding and the voting power of each; (b) determine the number of shares represented at a meeting and the validity of the proxies or ballots; (c) count all votes and ballots; (d) determine any challenges made to any determination made by the inspectors; (e) certify in a report in writing to the secretary of such meeting the determination of the number of shares represented at the meeting and the results of all votes and ballots.  An inspector of election need not be a stockholder of the Corporation, and any officer or employee of the Corporation may be an inspector of election on any question other than a vote for or against his or her election to any position with the corporation or on any other question in which he or she may be directly interested.

Section 2.08     Notices of Meetings and Consents.  Except as otherwise provided by the Articles of Incorporation or by the Nevada Revised Statutes (as amended from time to time, the “NRS”), a written notice of each annual and special meeting of stockholders shall be given not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of such meeting to each stockholder of record of the Corporation entitled to vote at such meeting by delivering such notice of meeting to such stockholder personally or depositing the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid, directed to him at the post office address shown upon the records of the Corporation.  Service of notice is complete upon mailing.  Every notice of a meeting of stockholders shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting, the means of electronic communication, if any, by which the stockholder or the proxies thereof shall be deemed to be present and vote and, in the case of a special meeting the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called.  The notice shall be delivered in accordance with, and shall contain or be accompanied by such additional information as may be required by, the NRS, including, without limitation, NRS 78.379, 92A.120 or 92A.410

Section 2.09     Proxies.  Each stockholder entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders may authorize a proxy to represent him at the meeting by an instrument executed in writing.  Each such proxy shall be valid until its expiration or revocation in a manner permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.  A proxy may be irrevocable if it states that it is irrevocable and, if, and only as long as, it is coupled with an interest sufficient to support an irrevocable power.  Subject to the above, any proxy may be revoked if an instrument or transmission revoking it or a properly created proxy bearing a later date is filed with or transmitted to the Secretary or another person appointed by the Corporation to count the votes of stockholders and determine the validity of proxies and ballots, or, in the case of a meeting of stockholders, the stockholder revokes the proxy by attending the meeting and voting the stockholder’s shares in person, in which case, any vote cast by the person or persons designated by the stockholder to act as a proxy or proxies must be disregarded by the Corporation when the votes are counted.

Section 2.10     Waiver of Notice.  Notice of any annual or special meeting may be waived either before, at or after such meeting in writing signed or by transmission of an electronic record by the person or persons entitled to the notice.  Attendance of a person at a meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the person attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting at the beginning of the meeting to the transacting of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.

Section 2.11     Written Action.  Any action that may be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent in writing, setting forth the actions so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be required to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.

Section 2.12     Order of Business.

(a)Annual Meetings of Stockholders.  At any annual or special meeting of the stockholders, only such business shall be conducted or considered (including, in the case of an annual meeting, nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors), as shall have been properly brought before the meeting.  For such business to be properly brought before an annual meeting, nominations and proposals of other business must be:  (a) specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, (b) otherwise properly brought before such meeting, by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly requested to be brought before such meeting by a stockholder of the Corporation in accordance with these Bylaws.

(b)General.  Except as otherwise provided by law, the Articles of Incorporation or these Bylaws, the chairman of any annual or special meeting shall have the power to determine whether a nomination or any other business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed, as the case may be, in accordance with these Bylaws and, if any proposed nomination or other business is not in compliance with these Bylaws, to declare that no action shall be taken on such nomination or other proposal and such nomination or other proposal shall be disregarded.

C-2




Section 2.13     Notice of Stockholder Business and Nominations.

(a)Timing Requirements.  With respect to any nominations or any other business to be brought before an annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice shall be considered timely if it is delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day and not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than one hundred (100) days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Corporation.

With respect to any business to be properly requested to be brought before a special meeting, a stockholder’s notice shall be considered timely if it is delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the date of such special meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such special meeting is less than one hundred (100) days prior to the date of such special meeting, the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made by the Corporation of the date of the special meeting.

Except as required by the NRS or Section 8.01 of these Bylaws, in no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual or special meeting of stockholders, as applicable, or the public announcement thereof, commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above.


C-3


(b)Disclosure Requirements.  To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice (whether given pursuant to Section 2.13(A) or 2.13(B) of these Bylaws) to the Secretary must include the following, as applicable: as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:  (i) the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on the Corporation’s books and of such beneficial owner or Control Person, if any, (ii) the number of shares of the Corporation which are, directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner or Control Person, if any (iii) a representation that the stockholder intends to appear at the meeting in person or by proxy to submit the business specified in such notice, (iv) if the notice relates to any business other than a nomination of director(s), a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, including the complete text of any resolutions proposed for consideration, and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, (v) any direct or indirect interest personal or other material interest of the stockholder in the business to be submitted, (vi) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of the stockholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, such stockholder or beneficial owner and by any Control Person or any other person acting in concert with any of the foregoing, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss, manage risk or benefit from changes in the share price of any class of the Corporation’s stock, or maintain, increase or decrease the voting power of the stockholder or beneficial owner with respect to shares of stock of the Corporation, and a representation that the stockholder will notify the Corporation in writing within five business days after the record date for such meeting of any such agreement, arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting, (vii) a representation whether the stockholder or the beneficial owner, if any, and any Control Person will engage in a solicitation with respect to the nomination or business and, if so, the name of each participant (as defined in Item 4 of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) in such solicitation and whether such person intends or is part of a group which intends to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation’s outstanding stock required to approve or adopt the business to be proposed (in person or by proxy) by the stockholder and (viii) any other information relating to such stockholder,  beneficial owner or Control Person, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement and form or proxy or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, the proposal and/or for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.  For purposes of this Section 2.13 a “Control Person” shall be a director, executive, managing member or control person of such stockholder giving the notice or, if the notice is given on behalf of a beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made or the business is proposed, as to such beneficial owner.

Nothing in these Bylaws shall be deemed to affect any rights of stockholders to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ARTICLE III
Board of Directors

Section 3.01     General Powers.  The business of the corporation shall be managed by the Board of Directors.

Section 3.02     Number, Qualification and Term of Office.  The number of directors, except to the extent, if any, otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation, shall be established from time to time by a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors, but shall in no case be less than three.  Directors need not be stockholders.  Each director shall hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders next held after his or her election or until the stockholders have elected directors by consent in writing without a meeting and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.  Nothing in this Section 3.02 shall restrict the right of the Board of Directors to fill vacancies or the right of the stockholders to remove directors each as provided in these Bylaws.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Articles of Incorporation, these Bylaws or any employment contract or other arrangement with the Corporation, any director of the Corporation who is determined to be a Disqualified Holder (as that term is defined in the Articles of Incorporation) or who is an affiliate of a Disqualified Holder shall cease to qualify to serve as a director of the Corporation.

Section 3.03     Annual Meeting.  As soon as practicable after each election of directors, the Board of Directors shall meet at the registered office of the corporation, or at such other place previously designated by the Board of Directors, for the purpose of electing the officers of the corporation and for the transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting.

Section 3.04     Regular Meetings.  Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held from time to time at such time and place as may be fixed by resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors.

Section 3.05     Special Meetings.  Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the Chairman of the Board, the President, or by any two of the directors and shall be held from time to time at such time and place as may be designated in the notice of such meeting.


C-4


Section 3.06     Notice of Meetings.  No notice need be given of any annual or regular meeting of the Board of Directors.  Notice of each special meeting of the Board of Directors shall be given by the Secretary who shall give at least twenty-four hours’ notice thereof to each director by mail, telephone, telegram, electronic transmission including email, or in person.  Notice shall be effective upon receipt.

Section 3.07     Waiver of Notice.  Notice of any meeting of the Board of Directors may be waived either before, at, or after such meeting in writing signed by each director.  Attendance of a person at a meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except when the person attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.

Section 3.08     Quorum and Voting.  A majority of the directors then in office shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.  The vote of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board of Directors unless these Bylaws, the Articles of Incorporation or the NRS require a greater number.

Section 3.09     Vacancies.  Any vacancy among the directors or increase in the authorized number of directors shall be filled for the unexpired term by the majority vote of the directors then in office though less than a quorum or by the sole remaining director.  When one or more directors shall resign from the Board, effective at a future date, a majority of the directors then in office may fill such vacancy or vacancies to take effect when such resignation or resignations shall become effective and the director or directors so chosen shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders and when his, her or their successors are elected or appointed, or until his, her or their earlier resignation or removal.

Section 3.10     Removal.  Any director may be removed from office at any special meeting of the stockholders either with or without cause by the vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, excluding stock entitled to vote only upon the happening of a fact or event unless such fact or event shall have occurred.  If the entire Board of Directors or any one or more directors be so removed, new directors may be elected at the same meeting.

Section 3.11     Committees of Directors.  The Board of Directors may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors, designate one or more committees, each to consist of one or more of the directors of the Corporation, which, to the extent provided in the resolution, may exercise the powers of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation.  The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the committee.  In the absence or disqualification of any member of such committee or committees, the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not constituting a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in the place of any such absent or disqualified member.  Such committee or committees shall have such name or names as may be determined by the resolution adopted by the directors.  The committees shall keep regular minutes of their proceedings and report the same to the Board of Directors when required.  Unless otherwise provided for in a resolution of the Board of Directors designating a committee pursuant to this Section 3.11: (i) fifty percent (50%) or more of the authorized number of members of such committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business of such committee and (ii) the vote of a majority of the members of such committee present at a meeting of such committee at which a quorum is present shall be the act of such committee except where otherwise required by these Bylaws or the charter of such committee.

Section 3.12     Written Action.  Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, all directors or committee members consent thereto in writing.  The written consent may be signed manually or electronically (or by any other means then permitted under the NRS), and may be so signed in counterparts, including, without limitation, facsimile or email counterparts, and the written consent shall be filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee.

Section 3.13     Compensation.  Directors who are not salaried officers of the Corporation may receive a fixed sum per meeting attended or a fixed annual sum, or both, and such other forms of reasonable compensation as may be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors.  All directors shall receive their expenses, if any, of attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.  Any director may serve the Corporation in any other capacity and receive proper compensation therefor.  If the Board of Directors establishes the compensation of directors pursuant to this Section 3.13, such compensation is presumed to be fair to the Corporation unless proven unfair by a preponderance of the evidence.

C-5




Section 3.14     Conference Communications.  Directors may participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors, or of any duly constituted committee thereof, by means of any conference telephone, electronic communications, videoconferencing, teleconferencing or other comparable communication technique or technology permitted under the NRS, including, without limitation, a telephone conference or similar method of communication whereby all persons participating in the meeting can hear and communicate to each other.  If any such means are utilized, the Corporation shall, to the extent required under the NRS, implement reasonable measures to (a) verify the identity of each person participating through such means as a director or member of the committee, as the case may be, and (b) provide the directors or members of the committee a reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the directors or members of the committee, including an opportunity to communicate, and to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting in a substantially concurrent manner with such proceedings.  For the purposes of establishing a quorum and taking any action at the meeting, such directors participating pursuant to this Section 3.14 shall be deemed present in person at the meeting.

ARTICLE IV
Officers

Section 4.01     Number.  The officers of the Corporation shall consist of a President, a Secretary and a Treasurer, or the equivalents of such officers.  The officers of the Corporation may consist of one or more Vice Presidents and any other officers and agents as the Board of Directors, by a majority vote of the total number of directors, may designate.  Any person may hold two or more offices.

Section 4.02     Election, Term of Office, and Qualifications.  At each annual meeting of the Board of Directors all officers shall be elected.  Such officers shall hold office until the next annual meeting of the directors or until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal, or until such office is eliminated by a vote of the majority of all directors.  Unless they have resigned or been removed, officers who may be directors shall hold office until the election and qualification of their successors, notwithstanding an earlier termination of their directorship.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Articles of Incorporation, these Bylaws or any employment contract or other arrangement with the Corporation, any officer of the Corporation who is determined to be a Disqualified Holder (as that term is defined in the Articles of Incorporation) or who is an affiliate of a Disqualified Holder shall cease to qualify to serve as an officer of the Corporation and, upon such disqualification, shall automatically and immediately cease to be a officer of the Corporation.

Section 4.03     Removal and Vacancies.  Any officer may be removed from his or her office by a majority vote of the total number of directors with or without cause.  A vacancy among the officers by death, resignation, removal, or otherwise shall be filled for the unexpired term by the Board of Directors.

Section 4.04     Chairman of the Board.  The Chairman of the Board, if one is elected, shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and directors and shall have such other duties as may be prescribed, from time to time, by the Board of Directors.

Section 4.05     President.  The President shall have general active management of the business of the Corporation.  In event of the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board, the President shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and directors.  The President shall see that all orders and resolutions of the directors are carried into effect.  The President may execute and deliver in the name of the Corporation any deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts or other instruments pertaining to the business of the Corporation and in general shall perform all duties usually incident to the office of the president.  The President shall have such other duties as may, from time to time, be prescribed by the Board of Directors.

Section 4.06     Vice President.  Each Vice President shall have such powers and shall perform such duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by the President.  In the event of absence or disability of the President, Vice Presidents shall succeed to his or her power and duties in the order designated by the Board of Directors.

Section 4.07     Secretary.  The Secretary shall be secretary of and shall attend all meetings of the stockholders and Board of Directors and shall record all proceedings of such meetings in the minute book of the Corporation.  The Secretary shall give proper notice of meetings of stockholders and the Board of Directors.  The Secretary shall perform such other duties as may from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by the President.

C-6




Section 4.08     Treasurer.  The Treasurer shall keep accurate accounts of all moneys of the Corporation received or disbursed.  The Treasurer shall deposit all moneys, drafts and checks in the name of and to the credit of the Corporation in such banks and depositories as a majority of the whole Board of Directors shall from time to time designate.  The Treasurer shall have power to endorse for deposit all notes, checks and drafts received by the Corporation.  The Treasurer shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as ordered by the directors, making proper vouchers therefor.  The Treasurer shall render to the President and the Board of Directors whenever required an account of all his or her transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation and shall perform such other duties as may from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors or by the President.

Section 4.09     Execution of Contracts and Documents.  Except as otherwise directed by the Board of Directors, all contracts, deeds, promissory notes, checks, drafts, or other instruments calling for the payment of money shall be signed by the President or a Vice President and, if a second signature is required, the Secretary or Treasurer.  The Board of Directors may authorize the use of the facsimile signatures of any such persons.

Section 4.10     Duties of other Officers.  The duties of such other officers and agents as the Board of Directors may designate shall be set forth in the resolution creating such office or by subsequent resolution.

Section 4.11     Compensation.  The officers of the Corporation shall receive such compensation for their services as may be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors or by one or more committees to the extent so authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors.

ARTICLE V
Shares and Their Transfer

Section 5.01     Shares of Stock.  The shares of stock of the Corporation shall be represented by a certificate, provided that the Board of Directors may provide by resolution or resolutions that some or all of any or all classes or series of the stock of the Corporation shall be uncertificated shares.  Any such resolution shall not apply to shares represented by a certificate until such certificate is surrendered to the Corporation.  Notwithstanding the adoption of any such resolution providing for uncertificated shares, every holder of stock of the Corporation theretofore represented by certificates and, upon request, every holder of uncertificated shares, shall be entitled to a certificate, to be in such form as shall be prescribed by the Board of Directors, certifying the number of shares in the Corporation owned by such holder.  The certificates for such shares shall be numbered in the order in which they shall be issued and shall be signed in the name of the Corporation by the Chairman of the Board, the President or a Vice President, and by the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, or the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary.  Every certificate surrendered to the Corporation for exchange or transfer shall be cancelled, and no new certificate or certificates shall be issued in exchange for any existing certificate until such certificate shall have been so cancelled, except in cases provided for in Section 5.04.

Section 5.02     Issuance of Stock.  The Board of Directors is authorized to cause to be issued stock of the Corporation up to the full amount authorized by the Articles of Incorporation in such amounts and for such consideration as may be determined by the Board of Directors.  Treasury shares may be disposed of by the Corporation for such consideration as may be fixed by the Board of Directors.

Section 5.03     Transfer of Stock.  Transfer of stock on the books of the Corporation may be authorized only by the record holder of such stock, the holder’s legal representative or the holder’s attorney lawfully constituted in writing and, in the case of stock represented by a certificate or certificates, upon surrender of the certificate or the certificates for such stock, and, in the case of uncertificated stock, upon receipt of proper transfer instructions and compliance with appropriate procedures for transferring stock in uncertificated form (in each case, with such proof of the authenticity of signature as the Corporation or its transfer agent may reasonably require).  The Corporation may treat as the absolute owner of stock of the Corporation the person or persons in whose name stock is registered on the books of the Corporation.  The Board of Directors may from time to time establish rules and regulations governing the issuance, transfer and registration of shares of stock of the Corporation.

Section 5.04     Loss of Certificates.  Any stockholder claiming a certificate for stock to be lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed shall make an affidavit of that fact in such form as the Board of Directors may require and shall, if the Board of Directors so requires, give the Corporation a bond of indemnity in form, in an amount, and with one or more sureties satisfactory to the Board of Directors, to indemnify the Corporation against any claims which may be made against it on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of the certificate or issuance of such new certificate.  The Corporation may then issue (a) a new certificate or certificates of stock or (b) uncertificated shares, for the same number of shares represented by the certificate claimed to have been lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed.

C-7




Section 5.05     Facsimile Signatures.  Whenever any certificate is countersigned by a transfer agent or by a registrar other than the Corporation or its employee, then the signatures of the officers or agents of the Corporation may be a facsimile.  In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed on any such certificate shall cease to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the Corporation as though the person who signed such certificate or whose facsimile signature or signatures had been placed thereon were such officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue.

ARTICLE VI
Books and Records, Audit, Fiscal Year

Section 6.01     Books and Records.  The Board of Directors of the Corporation shall cause to be kept: (a) a share ledger which shall be a charge of an officer designated by the Board of Directors; (b) records of all proceedings of stockholders and directors; and (c) such other records and books of account as shall be necessary and appropriate to the conduct of the corporate business.

Section 6.02     Audit.  The Board of Directors shall cause the records and books of account of the Corporation to be audited at least once in each fiscal year and at such other times as it may deem necessary or appropriate.

Section 6.03     Annual List.  The Board of Directors shall cause to be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State in each year the annual list required by law.

Section 6.04     Fiscal Year.  The fiscal year of the Corporation shall end on December 31 of each year.

ARTICLE VII
Indemnification; Expenses

Section 7.01     Indemnification.  The Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless, and the Board of Directors may authorize the purchase and maintenance of insurance or make other financial arrangements for the purpose of such indemnification, any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in such manner, under such circumstances and to the fullest extent permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and the NRS.

Section 7.02     Payment of Expenses.  In addition to any other rights of indemnification permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada or as may be provided for by the Corporation in the Articles of Incorporation, these Bylaws or by agreement, the expenses of directors and officers incurred in defending any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (including, without limitation, an action, suit or proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation), whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, involving alleged acts or omissions of such director or officer in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Corporation, or while serving in any capacity at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee, agent, member, manager, managing member, partner or fiduciary of, or in any other capacity for, another corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall be paid by the Corporation or through insurance purchased and maintained by the Corporation or through other financial arrangements made by the Corporation, as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation.  To the extent that an officer or director is successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any such action, suit or proceeding, or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the Corporation shall indemnify him or her against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the defense.

Section 7.03     Amendment.  No amendment to or repeal of this ARTICLE VII approved by the directors or stockholders of the Corporation shall apply to or have any effect on the right or protection of any director or officer of the Corporation existing prior to such amendment or repeal.

ARTICLE VIII
Miscellaneous


Section 8.01     Fixing Date for Determination of Stockholders of Record.

(a)In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or to express consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, or entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights, or entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock or for the purpose of any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a record date, which shall not be more than 60 nor less than 10 days before the date of such meeting, nor more than 60 days prior to any other action.
C-8


(b)If no record date is fixed:

(1)The record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall be at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held.

(2)The record date for determining stockholders entitled to express consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, when no prior action by the Board of Directors is necessary, shall be the day on which the first written consent is expressed.

(3)The record date for determining stockholders for any other purpose shall be at the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution relating thereto.

(c)A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting or to any postponement of any meeting of stockholders to a date not more than 60 days after the record date; provided,  that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting and must fix a new record date if the meeting is adjourned to a date more than 60 days later than the date set forth the original meeting.

Section 8.02     Periods of Time.  During any period of time prescribed by these Bylaws, the date from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included, and the last day of the period so computed shall be included.

Section 8.03     Voting Securities Held by the Corporation.  Unless otherwise ordered by the Board of Directors, the President shall have full power and authority on behalf of the Corporation (a) to attend, to act and to vote at any meeting of security holders or owners of other entities in which the Corporation may hold securities or ownership interests; (b) to execute any proxy for such meeting on behalf of the Corporation; or (c) to execute a written action in lieu of a meeting of such other entity on behalf of the Corporation.  At such meeting, by such proxy or by such writing in lieu of meeting, the President shall possess and may exercise any and all rights and powers incident to the ownership of such securities or ownership interests that the Corporation might have possessed and exercised if it had been present.  The Board of Directors may, from time to time, confer like powers upon any other person or persons.

Section 8.04     Purchase and Sale of Securities.  Unless otherwise ordered by the Board of Directors, the President shall have power and authority on behalf of the Corporation to purchase, sell, transfer or encumber any and all securities or ownership interests of any other entity owned by the Corporation and may execute and deliver such documents as may be necessary to effectuate such purchase, sale, transfer or encumbrance.  The Board of Directors may, from time to time, confer like powers upon any other person or persons.

Section 8.05     Restrictions on Transfer and Ownership.

(a)Invalid Securities.

(1)Effective immediately upon transmittal by the Corporation of a notice pursuant to paragraph (A)(2) of Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation (a “Redemption Notice”) to a Disqualified Holder (as defined in paragraph (J)(2) of Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation), the Securities (as defined in paragraph (J)(8) of Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation) specified in such Redemption Notice shall become “Invalid Securities” for purposes of this Section 8.05.

(2)Promptly following transmittal by the Corporation of a Redemption Notice, the Corporation shall Announce Publicly that such Redemption Notice has been given and that the terms of this Section 8.05 shall apply to the Securities specified in such Redemption Notice.

(b)Additional Definitions.  As used in this Section 8.05 only, the following terms shall have the following respective meanings:

C-9


(1)Acquire” means the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of ownership of Securities by any means, including, without limitation: (i) the exercise of any rights under any option, warrant, convertible security, pledge or other security interest or similar right to acquire Securities or (ii) the entering into of any swap, hedge or other arrangement that results in the acquisition of any of the economic benefits of ownership of Securities.  The terms “Acquires” and “Acquisition” shall have the same meaning, mutatis mutandis.

(2)Announce Publicly” means disclosure (i) in a press release reported by the Dow Jones, Newswire, Business Wire, Reuters Information Service or any similar or successor news wire service or (ii) in a communication distributed generally to stockholders or in a document publicly filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor provisions thereto.

(3)Disposition” means the sale, transfer, exchange, assignment, liquidation, conveyance, pledge, abandonment, distribution, contribution, or other disposition of Securities.

(4)Person” means an individual, corporation, estate, trust, association, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture or similar organization or entity.

(5)Transfer” means any direct or indirect Acquisition or Disposition.

(c)Transfer Limitations.

(1)No Disqualified Holder or Purported Transferee (as defined below) shall be permitted to make a Transfer of Invalid Securities, and any such purported Transfer will be void ab initio (any such purported Transfer, a “Prohibited Transfer”).

(2)The restrictions set forth in Section 8.05(c)(1) shall not apply to a proposed Transfer, and a Transfer shall not be treated as a Prohibited Transfer hereunder, if the transferor or the transferee obtains prior approval of the proposed Transfer by the Board of Directors.  As a condition to granting its approval pursuant to this Section 8.05(c)(2), the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, require and/or obtain (at the expense of the transferor and/or transferee) such documentation, information and action, if any, as it determines in its sole discretion to be appropriate, including, without limitation, representations and warranties from the transferor and/or transferee, such opinions of counsel to be rendered by counsel selected by (or acceptable to) the Board of Directors, and such other advice, in each case as to such matters as the Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion is appropriate.

(3)The restrictions set forth in Section 8.05(c)(1) shall not apply to an Acquisition by the Corporation.  Once Invalid Securities have been Acquired by the Corporation, such Securities shall cease to be Invalid Securities.

(d)Treatment of Invalid Securities.

(1)No employee or agent of the Corporation shall record any Prohibited Transfer, and the purported transferee of a Prohibited Transfer (the “Purported Transferee”) shall not be recognized as a security holder of the Corporation for any purpose whatsoever in respect of the Invalid Securities.  The Purported Transferee shall not be entitled with respect to such Invalid Securities to any rights of the applicable class of security holders of the Corporation, including, without limitation, any right to vote such Invalid Securities, to receive dividends or distributions, whether liquidating or otherwise, in respect thereof and to effect any Transfer thereof.

(2)Once Invalid Securities exist, the Corporation may require, including, but not limited to, as a condition to the registration of the Transfer of any Securities that may be Invalid Securities or the payment of any dividend or distribution on any such Securities, that the proposed transferee or payee furnish to the Corporation all information reasonably requested by the Corporation to permit a determination of whether such Securities are Invalid Securities.  The Corporation may make such arrangements or issue such instructions to the applicable transfer agent, registrar, depositary, trustee or other securities intermediary as may be determined by the Board of Directors to be necessary or advisable to implement this Section 8.05(d), including, without limitation, authorizing such transfer agent, registrar, depositary, trustee or other securities intermediary to require an affidavit from a proposed transferee or payee regarding such Person’s actual and constructive ownership of any such Securities, the transfer of any such Securities and other evidence that a Transfer will not be prohibited by this Section 8.05 or Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation as a condition to registering any such Transfer or paying any such dividend or distribution.


C-10




(3)If a Prohibited Transfer has occurred:  (1) the Prohibited Transfer and, if applicable, the registration of such Prohibited Transfer, shall be void ab initio and have no legal effect, (2) the Purported Transferee shall be bound by the terms of the Redemption Notice and Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation with respect to the Invalid Securities purportedly Transferred, (3) the Redemption Notice shall thereafter constitute a binding agreement on the part of the Corporation to redeem, and on the part of the Purported Transferee to sell, the Invalid Securities in accordance with Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation (such redemption and sale, the “Purported Transferee Redemption”) and (4) the Purported Transferee Redemption shall thereafter be effectuated in accordance with paragraph (A)(2) of Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation (including, for the avoidance of doubt, at the date, time and place specified in the Redemption Notice and at the Redemption Price (as defined in paragraph (J)(7) of the Articles of Incorporation) determined by reference to the original Purchase Price (as defined in paragraph (J)(6) of the Articles of Incorporation) of the Disqualified Holder to whom the Redemption Notice was given); provided that the Corporation shall pay the Redemption Price of any Invalid Securities redeemed in a Purported Transferee Redemption to the Purported Transferee of the Invalid Securities so redeemed, in which case such payment shall extinguish any obligation of the Corporation to make payment in respect of such Invalid Securities to the Disqualified Holder that effectuated the applicable Prohibited Transfer; provided further that if the date specified in the Redemption Notice shall have already passed, the Purported Transferee Redemption shall take place at such date and time as the Corporation reasonably selects by notice to the Purported Transferee.

(4)The recourse of any Purported Transferee to the Corporation in respect of any Prohibited Transfer shall be limited to the Redemption Price as determined in accordance with Section 8.05(d)(3).

(5)If the Purported Transferee fails to surrender the Invalid Securities for redemption in accordance with Section 8.05(d)(3), then the Corporation may, in such manner and at such time, as determined by the Board of Directors, enforce the provisions hereof, which may include the institution of legal proceedings to compel the surrender.  Nothing in this Section 8.05(d) shall (a) be deemed inconsistent with any Prohibited Transfer of the Invalid Securities provided in this Section 8.05 being void ab initio or (b) preclude the Corporation in its discretion from immediately bringing legal proceedings without a prior demand.

(e)Liability.  To the fullest extent permitted by law, any security holder subject to the provisions of this Section 8.05 who violates the provisions of this Section 8.05 and any Persons controlling, controlled by or under common control with such security holder shall be jointly and severally liable to the Corporation for, and shall indemnify and hold the Corporation harmless against, any and all damages suffered as a result of such violation, including, but not limited to, damages resulting from the Corporation’s inability to secure and maintain in good standing any licenses, contracts, franchises and other regulatory approvals related to the Corporation’s business, and attorneys’ and auditors’ fees incurred in connection with such violation.

(f)Compliance.

(1)The Corporation shall have the power to make appropriate notations upon any certificates representing Securities or its stock and other Securities transfer records and to instruct any transfer agent, registrar, depositary, trustee or other securities intermediary with respect to the requirements of this Section 8.05 for any uncertificated Securities or Securities held in an indirect holding system.

(2)The Board of Directors shall have the power to decide all matters necessary for determining compliance with this Section 8.05, including, without limitation, determining (A) whether a Transfer is a Prohibited Transfer, (B) whether an instrument constitutes a Security, (C) the interpretation of any provision of this Section 8.05, and (D) any other matter that the Board of Directors determines to be relevant.  The good faith determination of the Board of Directors on such matters shall be conclusive and binding on all persons and entities for the purposes of this Section 8.05.

Section 8.06.     Suitability Analysis of Significant Stockholders.  To enable the Corporation or any of its affiliates to secure, maintain in good standing and renew all licenses, contracts, franchises and other regulatory approvals related to the operation of gaming and related businesses now or hereafter engaged in by the Corporation or any of its affiliates within or without the United States of America, the Corporation will conduct a suitability analysis of each Significant Stockholder (as defined below) and intends to require all relevant information pertaining to suitability and/or qualification, as those terms are commonly understood in gaming laws applicable to the Corporation, from such Significant Stockholder in connection therewith.  “Significant Stockholder” means any stockholder of the Corporation who, together with all affiliates or associates of such stockholder, beneficially owns (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), directly or indirectly, five percent or more of any class of capital stock of the Corporation.  For purposes solely of this Section 8.06, “affiliate” and “associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

C-11




Section 8.07.     SeverabilityIf any provision or provisions of Sections 8.05 or 8.06 of these Bylaws shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstances for any reason whatsoever, then, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the validity, legality and enforceability of such provisions in any other circumstance and of the remaining provisions of Sections 8.05 and 8.06 of these Bylaws (including, without limitation, each portion of any sentence of Sections 8.05 or 8.06 of these Bylaws containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable that is not itself held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) and the application of such provision to other persons or entities and circumstances shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

ARTICLE IX
Amendments

Section 9.01      Amendments Section 9.02.  These Bylaws may be amended, altered or repealed by a vote of the majority of the total number of directors or of the stockholders at any meeting upon proper notice.

ARTICLE X
General

Section 10.01    Forum for Adjudication of Disputes.  To the fullest extent permitted by law, and unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, administrative or investigative or that assert any claim or counterclaim (a) brought in the name or right of the Corporation or on its behalf, (b) asserting a claim for breach of any fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (c) arising or asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of NRS Chapters 78 or 92A or any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or these Bylaws or (d) asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine.  In the event that the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada does not have jurisdiction over any such action, suit or proceeding, then any other state district court located in the State of Nevada shall be the sole and exclusive forum therefor and in the event that no state district court in the State of Nevada has jurisdiction over any such action, suit or proceeding, then a federal court located within the State of Nevada shall be the sole and exclusive forum therefor.  Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Section 10.01.

Section 10.02    Application of These Bylaws.  In the event that any provisions of these Bylaws is or may be in conflict with any law of the United States, of the State of Nevada, or of any governmental body or power having jurisdiction over this Corporation, or over the subject matter to which such provision of these Bylaws applies, or may apply, such provision of these Bylaws shall be inoperative to the extent only that the operation thereof conflicts with such law, and shall in all other respects be in full force and effect.

Section 10.03    Invalid Provisions.  If any part of these Bylaws is held invalid or inoperative for any reason, the remaining parts, so far as possible and reasonable, shall be valid and operative.


C-12

a2016proxyimage1a01.jpg

SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
6650 S. EL CAMINO6601 BERMUDA ROAD
LAS VEGAS, NV 8911889119

 
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 PMp.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
 
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Scientific Games Corporation in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
 
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 PMp.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
 
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: 
E28620-P89090KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
 DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:ForAgainstAbstain
1.To adopt the reincorporation merger agreement.
2.Authority to adjourn the special meeting
NOTE: To consider and act upon any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION 
For
All
 
Withhold
All
 
For All
Except
 To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 
 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: o o o           
  1.To elect 13 members of the Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.                
  Nominees:                  
 01)Ronald O. Perelman08)Paul M. Meister                
 02)Kevin M. Sheehan09)Judge Gabrielle K. McDonald                
 03)Richard Haddrill10)Barry F. Schwartz                
 04)M. Gavin Isaacs11)Michael J. Regan                
 05)Peter A. Cohen12)Frances F. Townsend                
 06)Gerald J. Ford13)Viet D. Dinh                
 07)David L. Kennedy                  
                         
 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:   For Against Abstain   
 2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers   o o o 
 The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:1 Year 2 Years 
3
Years
 Abstain   
 3.To indicate on an advisory basis, whether the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers should take place every year, every two years or every three years.o o o o 
 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:  For Against Abstain   
 4.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.   o o o 
                         
 NOTE: To consider and act upon any other matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.   
                         
 Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 
         
 Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date  Signature (Joint Owners)Date   









Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the AnnualSpecial Meeting:

The Notice & Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

]
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
6601 Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

www.proxyvote.comSPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - [                         ]., 2017







The undersigned hereby appoints Michael A. Quartieri and David W. Smail, or either of them, as Proxy or Proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution to act for the undersigned and to vote the full number of shares of the Class A Common Stock of Scientific Games Corporation that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the special meeting of Stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation to be held at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North, Las Vegas, NV at 10:00 a.m. on [                         ], 2017, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, in accordance with the instructions set forth on this proxy card, and in their discretion, with respect to all other matters that may properly come before the meeting. Any proxy heretofore given by the undersigned with respect to such shares is hereby revoked.









This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.











(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)
E28621-P89090
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION
6650 S. El Camino Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - JUNE 14, 2017
The undersigned hereby appoints Michael A. Quartieri and David W. Smail, or either of them, as Proxy or Proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution to act for the undersigned and to vote the full number of shares of the Class A Common Stock of Scientific Games Corporation that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Scientific Games Corporation to be held at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North, Las Vegas, Nevada at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 14, 2017, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, in accordance with the instructions set forth on this proxy card, and in their discretion, with respect to all other matters that may properly come before the meeting. Any proxy heretofore given by the undersigned with respect to such shares is hereby revoked.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)